Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Falling Down - Park Beggar Scene

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,338 Founders Club
edited March 2021 in Tug Tavern
«13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,805 Founders Club
  • huskyhooligan
    huskyhooligan Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,924 Swaye's Wigwam
    Need to watch again.
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,785 Swaye's Wigwam
    Beggar too clean

    having worked in engineering for years - I can relate to this movie. Many of my cow-orkers fit this guy to a tee. Scary
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,233 Founders Club
    LebamDawg said:

    Beggar too clean

    having worked in engineering for years - I can relate to this movie. Many of my cow-orkers fit this guy to a tee. Scary

    Yeah Kirk’s son looks like a laid off McDonnell Douglas engineer from Long Beach or something.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,805 Founders Club
    You were in Vietnam? As what the little drummer boy?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2021

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    You’re not sorry.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,805 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    I don't remember neo nazis. I know he was the angry white guy that was a big narrative at the time but he was good at it

    I thought it got off track with the domestic violence. Too much angry white guy
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    I don't remember neo nazis. I know he was the angry white guy that was a big narrative at the time but he was good at it

    I thought it got off track with the domestic violence. Too much angry white guy
    https://youtu.be/0jSVwZ8w3C4
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,805 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    I don't remember neo nazis. I know he was the angry white guy that was a big narrative at the time but he was good at it

    I thought it got off track with the domestic violence. Too much angry white guy
    https://youtu.be/0jSVwZ8w3C4
    Ok. I recall it now. Frederick Forrest is insane
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    I don't remember neo nazis. I know he was the angry white guy that was a big narrative at the time but he was good at it

    I thought it got off track with the domestic violence. Too much angry white guy
    https://youtu.be/0jSVwZ8w3C4
    Ok. I recall it now. Frederick Forrest is insane
    Met him in a Blues bar in Santa Monica a long time ago.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,233 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    Oh for love of god, it's a make believe Hollywood movie. LA sucks ballz. Much of the film did a good jerb of portraying the shitieness of LA. And I say that as I guy who lived in San Diego county when that flick came out. We couldn't get through that place quick enough on our way north.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2021

    SFGbob said:

    Great movie

    Sorry to disagree. As someone who lived in LA when the movie came out the thought that neo-Nazis represented some kind of threat in LA was laughable. They purposely pulled their punches when it came to making this a realistic movie. They should have based the movie is "Springfield" because it had no basis in the reality of LA in the early 90s.
    Oh for love of god, it's a make believe Hollywood movie. LA sucks ballz. Much of the film did a good jerb of portraying the shitieness of LA. And I say that as I guy who lived in San Diego county when that flick came out. We couldn't get through that place quick enough on our way north.
    That's not the way the movie was marketed or discussed. It was held out to be some kind of realistic, slice of modern America and a social commentary. They weren't trying to create a fantasy movie. Would you have the same opinion of a version of Boys in the Hood that depicted white people are the real victims of police brutality in LA?

    Maybe we can remake Menace II Society using the same locations and story line but make Mormons the lead characters.

    Hey, just a make believe Hollywood movie, so no big deal.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    So if we remade Menace II Society and put white people in the lead roles changing nothing else you'd be cool with it. Okay.

    The decision to pull their punches in making Falling Down was entirely political.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    May be so, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Ignorance is bliss.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    So if we remade Menace II Society and put white people in the lead roles changing nothing else you'd be cool with it.

    Who fucking cares?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    So if we remade Menace II Society and put white people in the lead roles changing nothing else you'd be cool with it.

    Who fucking cares?

    Obviously not people who enjoy a false reality spoon fed to them as long as it's wrapped in "entertainment."

    Can't wait for the WWII movies depicting Nazis as the real victims.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,233 Founders Club
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    So if we remade Menace II Society and put white people in the lead roles changing nothing else you'd be cool with it.

    Who fucking cares?

    Obviously not people who enjoy a false reality spoon fed to them as long as it's wrapped in "entertainment."

    Can't wait for the WWII movies depicting Nazis as the real victims.
    If I gave a fuck about the politics of so many of my favorite entertainers, I'd have nothing to enjoy.

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    So if we remade Menace II Society and put white people in the lead roles changing nothing else you'd be cool with it.

    Who fucking cares?

    Obviously not people who enjoy a false reality spoon fed to them as long as it's wrapped in "entertainment."

    Can't wait for the WWII movies depicting Nazis as the real victims.
    If I gave a fuck about the politics of so many of my favorite entertainers, I'd have nothing to enjoy.

    Don't give a fuck about Michael Douglas politics. But I can't mindlessly watch a movie when they are obviously pushing a narrative for political reasons and ignore the narrative. Like I said, if they wanted to make a fantasy movie they shouldn't put it in LA and promoted it as a realistic slice of urban life. Different strokes. You're free to watch movies ignoring the narrative and or agenda being pushed, and I'm free to acknowledge it. Neither is right or wrong.
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member Posts: 7,696
    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited March 2021

    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?

    Movie was made in 1992. That year LA set their all time murder rate numbers. 1992 was also the year of the LA riots. Crime and violence in LA in 1992 were out of control. Neo-nazis weren't driving those numbers. If you're trying to display the urban dystopia that was LA in 1992, focusing on neo-Nazis and vaguely Hispanic gang bangers and old white guys golfing doesn't quite get you there.

    But hey, NOC so why are we even discussing this?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?

    Movie was made in 1992. That year LA set their all time murder rate numbers. 1992 was also the year of the LA riots. Crime and violence in LA in 1992 were out of control. Neo-nazis weren't driving those numbers.
    It's about time someone took a stand for the poor, bullied, unfairly represented Nazi.

    Kudos for your bravery.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?

    Movie was made in 1992. That year LA set their all time murder rate numbers. 1992 was also the year of the LA riots. Crime and violence in LA in 1992 were out of control. Neo-nazis weren't driving those numbers.
    It's about time someone took a stand for the poor, bullied, unfairly represented Nazi.

    Kudos for your bravery.
    I thought you didn't care? Depict neo-Nazis, any way you like, hell make them responsible for global warming and the Covid pandemic I don't give a fuck. Just don't tell me that it represents some form of reality or that it depicts a slice of real life. But you don't care so why are you responding?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?

    Movie was made in 1992. That year LA set their all time murder rate numbers. 1992 was also the year of the LA riots. Crime and violence in LA in 1992 were out of control. Neo-nazis weren't driving those numbers.
    It's about time someone took a stand for the poor, bullied, unfairly represented Nazi.

    Kudos for your bravery.
    I thought you didn't care? Depict neo-Nazis, any way you like, hell make them responsible for global warming and the Covid pandemic I don't give a fuck. Just don't tell me that it represents some form of reality or that it depicts a slice of real life. But you don't care so why are you responding?
    I don't care about white Menace II Society. Nor about this movie I have never seen and probably never will.

    I do enjoy getting you to continue your little rant.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    dnc said:

    SFGbob said:

    I still don't understand the criticism. Been a long time since I've seen the movie, so I don't remember it all. What are the punches that were supposedly pulled? Why would depicting Neo-Nazis in LA be pulling punches?

    Movie was made in 1992. That year LA set their all time murder rate numbers. 1992 was also the year of the LA riots. Crime and violence in LA in 1992 were out of control. Neo-nazis weren't driving those numbers.
    It's about time someone took a stand for the poor, bullied, unfairly represented Nazi.

    Kudos for your bravery.
    I thought you didn't care? Depict neo-Nazis, any way you like, hell make them responsible for global warming and the Covid pandemic I don't give a fuck. Just don't tell me that it represents some form of reality or that it depicts a slice of real life. But you don't care so why are you responding?
    I don't care about white Menace II Society. Nor about this movie I have never seen and probably never will.

    I do enjoy getting you to continue your little rant.
    You seem to care quite a bit. You cared enough to create a strawman and fuck it in the ass.