Democrats aim to take nuke codes from Sleepy Grandpa Joe
Comments
-
JILL!!!! WHAT'S THIS RED BUTTON DO???
-
Wait what?
-
NBD it’s just his own party doing so. Lots of confidence in the Big Guy!Goduckies said:Wait what?
Invoke the 25th!! -
This. They’re slow walking their way to the 25th. Once he’s done signing the EOs he’s been fed, it’s door.ass.out.NorthwestFresh said:
NBD it’s just his own party doing so. Lots of confidence in the Big Guy!Goduckies said:Wait what?
Invoke the 25th!! -
Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
NBD it’s just his own party doing so. Lots of confidence in the Big Guy!Goduckies said:Wait what?
Invoke the 25th!!
May as well just get rid of the entire “Commander-in-Chief” thing too. Unelected, unknown people controlling the nukes. What could possibly go wrong?GrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
I'm guessing they want Chairman Xi to have veto power.
-
"I don't know, you play video games. What do you think I'm a doctor or something?"PurpleThrobber said:JILL!!!! WHAT'S THIS RED BUTTON DO???
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
This geezer is an absolute embarrassment globally and our enemies love it.
-
Chief? Not woke at all. Shame on Joe's cultural appropriation.NorthwestFresh said:
NBD it’s just his own party doing so. Lots of confidence in the Big Guy!Goduckies said:Wait what?
Invoke the 25th!!
May as well just get rid of the entire “Commander-in-Chief” thing too. Unelected, unknown people controlling the nukes. What could possibly go wrong?GrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
What was all that cultural norm stuff about???!NorthwestFresh said:This geezer is an absolute embarrassment globally and our enemies love it.
-
Muslims in prison camps is OK with Joe.LoneStarDawg said:
What was all that cultural norm stuff about???!NorthwestFresh said:This geezer is an absolute embarrassment globally and our enemies love it.
Two white Canadians in Chinese custody is a bridge too far for the Racist-in-Chief.
Reminds me of when Trump got the Black UCLA players released from China and then they criticized Trump for it because Trump is a white supremacist.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-basketball-players-20171119-story.html?_amp=true
Trump changes mind on 3 UCLA students arrested in China: ‘Should have left them in jail!’ -
The US Government and all related institutions should be Public Enemy #1 for you. Worry about them before worrying about global enemies. You need to eat a bag full of red pills because you still believe in allies who are not your allies, and enemies that are not your enemies, as well as enemies that don't actually exist (like viruses).
The Actor you know as "Biden" has no access to nukes. These "House Democrats" know that. -
I got the music in me.oregonblitzkrieg said:The US Government and all related institutions should be Public Enemy #1 for you. Worry about them before worrying about global enemies. You need to eat a bag full of red pills because you still believe in allies who are not your allies, and enemies that are not your enemies, as well as enemies that don't actually exist (like viruses).
The Actor you know as "Biden" has no access to nukes. These "House Democrats" know that. -
-
In theory I can see the logicGrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
But in an instance where you need to use the codes (and maybe the issue is whether or not nukes should be used period) and using them is in a time sensitive manner ... do we really want the use of the codes to get locked up in bureaucracy given that we have a government that can’t agree on anything to begin with? -
That is the exact reason the president is the only one that gets to decide. If we need to launch, we don't have time to wait.Tequilla said:
In theory I can see the logicGrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
But in an instance where you need to use the codes (and maybe the issue is whether or not nukes should be used period) and using them is in a time sensitive manner ... do we really want the use of the codes to get locked up in bureaucracy given that we have a government that can’t agree on anything to begin with? -
I can’t believe anyone voted for this bumbling moron.NorthwestFresh said:This geezer is an absolute embarrassment globally and our enemies love it.
-
They walk among usEsophagealFeces said:
I can’t believe anyone voted for this bumbling moron.NorthwestFresh said:This geezer is an absolute embarrassment globally and our enemies love it.
-
I happen to disagree with the argument, but it's an actual principled stand, which seem to be rare these days. Mitigating powers when your party controls the seat is a healthy feature of democracy.GrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
The Dem proposal mentions something about a concurring opinion within presidential chain of succession. I don't know what I think about the details of that. However, in concept, I'm intrigued. Because I am a dork, I've read a fair amount about this stuff in the last couple years. There is much room for improvement.Tequilla said:
In theory I can see the logicGrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
But in an instance where you need to use the codes (and maybe the issue is whether or not nukes should be used period) and using them is in a time sensitive manner ... do we really want the use of the codes to get locked up in bureaucracy given that we have a government that can’t agree on anything to begin with? -
Unless another decision maker isn't around. But Slow Joe can't be trusted with a squirt gun. Nice steal you dipshits.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I happen to disagree with the argument, but it's an actual principled stand, which seem to be rare these days. Mitigating powers when your party controls the seat is a healthy feature of democracy.GrundleStiltzkin said:Take the names and parties off that, and it's a policy change I tend to agree with.
-
The photos I posted was from the Dead Zone a early Steven King classic and 1983 movie. Going back to Dr Strangeglove this has been a thing that we really don't know how to deal with. As I recall Denzel had to save the world from Gene Hackman on a nuclear sub.
Would a committee be more or less likely to kill a billion people or so than one man?
Maybe just institute the Green New Deal and lose half the population the old fashioned way - starvation and disease
It is interesting that a democrat president is getting this treatment. -
Gaia willing.RaceBannon said:The photos I posted was from the Dead Zone a early Steven King classic and 1983 movie. Going back to Dr Strangeglove this has been a thing that we really don't know how to deal with. As I recall Denzel had to save the world from Gene Hackman on a nuclear sub.
Would a committee be more or less likely to kill a billion people or so than one man?
Maybe just institute the Green New Deal and lose half the population the old fashioned way - starvation and disease
It is interesting that a democrat president is getting this treatment.
Edit: I don't remember a nuke/CnC plot line from Dead Zone. Not sure if I ever saw the movie.
-
Matthew Broderick once saved the world by playing Tic Tac Toe with a sentient computer that went rogue with nukes and was way ahead of its tim technologically. AI in the mid-80s movies knew more than those silly generals in Colorado!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Gaia willing.RaceBannon said:The photos I posted was from the Dead Zone a early Steven King classic and 1983 movie. Going back to Dr Strangeglove this has been a thing that we really don't know how to deal with. As I recall Denzel had to save the world from Gene Hackman on a nuclear sub.
Would a committee be more or less likely to kill a billion people or so than one man?
Maybe just institute the Green New Deal and lose half the population the old fashioned way - starvation and disease
It is interesting that a democrat president is getting this treatment.
Edit: I don't remember a nuke/CnC plot line from Dead Zone. Not sure if I ever saw the movie. -
Greg Stilson was the son of a bible salesman who was running for Senate as a populist. So you know he's dangerous already. The Christopher Walken shakes his hand and sees the vision of President Stilson threatening to cut off the hand of a general to launch the nukes as was his destiny.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Gaia willing.RaceBannon said:The photos I posted was from the Dead Zone a early Steven King classic and 1983 movie. Going back to Dr Strangeglove this has been a thing that we really don't know how to deal with. As I recall Denzel had to save the world from Gene Hackman on a nuclear sub.
Would a committee be more or less likely to kill a billion people or so than one man?
Maybe just institute the Green New Deal and lose half the population the old fashioned way - starvation and disease
It is interesting that a democrat president is getting this treatment.
Edit: I don't remember a nuke/CnC plot line from Dead Zone. Not sure if I ever saw the movie. -
The photos I posted was from the Dead Zone a early Steven King classic and 1983 movie.
Walken's dead-zone skit on SNL was even better. -
One of his lesser known gems
-
