Murray wasn't trying to re-order our society based upon his observations and analysis he was commenting on how society was reordering itself based upon IQ stratification. The people who are currently trying to re-order society by forcing a square peg in round hole, are the ones who insist that it's evidence of white racism and white supremacy if the number of doctors or lawyers or scientists or professors or classic symphony players doesn't track neatly to the racial demographics of the country. Just because you may be part of a group that statistically has a lower IQ doesn't mean you as an individual have a lower IQ. Not all Asians are good at math. But statistically more Asians are going to be better at math than white people and we shouldn't expect that white people make up their racial demographic percentage wise when it comes to hiring or filling the slots of math wiz jobs. Murray also talked about the intellectual strip mining of rural America. My wife's parents are from Warrenton, Oregon a small town south of Astoria. They are both very smart and my wife's dad went to work on tug boats at age 16. They both stayed and raised their kids in Warrenton. My wife is really smart and went to Oregon and after graduation moved to the Portland area. Everyone in her small graduation class that went to college moved away. In particular, the males in her class that weren't smart stayed and lots ended up on drugs and alcohol as the timber industry collapsed. Suicides, drownings, and jail was common. My wife's high school reunions were pretty sad affairs.
Murray wasn't trying to re-order our society based upon his observations and analysis he was commenting on how society was reordering itself based upon IQ stratification. The people who are currently trying to re-order society by forcing a square peg in round hole, are the ones who insist that it's evidence of white racism and white supremacy if the number of doctors or lawyers or scientists or professors or classic symphony players doesn't track neatly to the racial demographics of the country. Just because you may be part of a group that statistically has a lower IQ doesn't mean you as an individual have a lower IQ. Not all Asians are good at math. But statistically more Asians are going to be better at math than white people and we shouldn't expect that white people make up their racial demographic percentage wise when it comes to hiring or filling the slots of math wiz jobs.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies.
Murray wasn't trying to re-order our society based upon his observations and analysis he was commenting on how society was reordering itself based upon IQ stratification. The people who are currently trying to re-order society by forcing a square peg in round hole, are the ones who insist that it's evidence of white racism and white supremacy if the number of doctors or lawyers or scientists or professors or classic symphony players doesn't track neatly to the racial demographics of the country. Just because you may be part of a group that statistically has a lower IQ doesn't mean you as an individual have a lower IQ. Not all Asians are good at math. But statistically more Asians are going to be better at math than white people and we shouldn't expect that white people make up their racial demographic percentage wise when it comes to hiring or filling the slots of math wiz jobs. As a function of policies that drive quotas, I certainly agree. I've never agreed with that approach. On the other hand, if there are environmental factors that drive bad outcomes for various groups, and it's something we can help, then I'm also not opposed to society interfering on some level. In other words, I don't insist on strict Darwinism to sort this all out and improve the lot for people.A good example of such people who aren't discussed nearly enough are Native Americans and their plight on the reservations. Can we do better than that arrangement? Maybe the answer is no reservations and full assimilation? Maybe that was the answer all along. That kind of thing.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.”
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this?
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this? You said someone was leading us to a separate society I showed you whoBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this? You said someone was leading us to a separate society I showed you whoBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. The culture warrior fighting college students is the real hero. People saying black people are dumber than white people because of their *equal* genetics, you don’t say shit. People praising Stefan Molyneux who advocates for separate but equal, you don’t say shit. But college kids college kids saying this is how it’s always been for white kids, that it allows them to not feel like and outnumbered minority and brave Race comes thundering in. Can’t say I’m surprised you’d pick your fight with college kids though, fascists love to punch down.
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this? You said someone was leading us to a separate society I showed you whoBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. The culture warrior fighting college students is the real hero. People saying black people are dumber than white people because of their *equal* genetics, you don’t say shit. People praising Stefan Molyneux who advocates for separate but equal, you don’t say shit. But college kids college kids saying this is how it’s always been for white kids, that it allows them to not feel like and outnumbered minority and brave Race comes thundering in. Can’t say I’m surprised you’d pick your fight with college kids though, fascists love to punch down. I never went to college so I'm punching upI have no idea what the fuck you're talking about eitherBill Kristol is a piece of shit if that helpsCollege segregation won't end any better this time than last but I'm sure you're morally superior so go for it
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this? You said someone was leading us to a separate society I showed you whoBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. The culture warrior fighting college students is the real hero. People saying black people are dumber than white people because of their *equal* genetics, you don’t say shit. People praising Stefan Molyneux who advocates for separate but equal, you don’t say shit. But college kids college kids saying this is how it’s always been for white kids, that it allows them to not feel like and outnumbered minority and brave Race comes thundering in. Can’t say I’m surprised you’d pick your fight with college kids though, fascists love to punch down. It’s the college kids and administrators on your team pushing for “safe spaces” that exclude white students.You skipped right over everything posted about neo-segregation pushed by modern Leftists. But but Stefan Somebody!!https://twitter.com/campusreform/status/693634839371763713?s=21
On a side note, IQ tests are good at one thing: Determining who will have difficulties in education. IQ tests being taken for any other reason is not completely worthless but close to it. For instance, I have taken an IQ test to get a job as VP of Sales for a company. Absolutely worthless waste of time and money and it was the first thing I got rid of when I was given the job. The IQ test isn't measuring personality traits, willingness to take direction, thinking on your feet in social situations, how hard an individual works, all the things that go into being a decent sales person.Lastly, I always enjoy watching liberals try to walk that fine racist line when they get that urge to recreate society in the image they think it should resemble. To deny genetics is to deny reality. Denying that genetics plays a part erodes a liberals argument long before it even begins. It is denying science. But it is OK for them to lump all black Americans in as a disadvantaged group, one that needs exception to survive in this horribly racist world. Or to claim that all whites are polluted with the same inherent racism and white privilege (genetics). It is the hypocrisy and racism of the left that fuels this very discussion. This is actually a pretty damn good post. No, it’s not. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/race-genetics-science-africahttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2017/science-genetics-reshaping-race-debate-21st-century/https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17595942/https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/https://www.illinoisscience.org/2020/09/there-is-no-biological-meaning-for-race/https://meshdiversity.com/there-is-no-scientific-basis-for-race/https://medium.com/swlh/there-is-no-such-thing-as-race-at-the-genetic-level-e0e1ba86a540https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/reading-frames/race-is-not-a-genomic-phenomenon-64266/ampBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. https://spiked-online.com/2021/02/18/woke-segregation-comes-to-campus/It was this ideology at work in Elon University’s ‘white caucus’. This was a planned series of Zoom meetings at the North Carolina university’s School of Education, in which ‘white-identifying students’ would be encouraged to ‘engage in conversations that unpack race and systemic oppression’. The sessions were white-only so that the discussions would not ‘burden or re-traumatise people of colour’. Instead, the white caucuses would provide whites with ‘a space to learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems’.https://usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/01/28/racial-segregation-college-campuses-ethnic-division-racist-civil-rights-column/4587577002/“Segregation now, segregation tomorrow and segregation forever!” Those words were thundered by Alabama Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 inauguration speech. But, in fact, the very next year, Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which brought an end to segregation.Or did it?Wallace later repented of this phrase, but in 2020, the 1963 George Wallace seems to be getting some traction. Because all over America — and even in Alabama — universities and schools are promoting and endorsing schemes that divide and label students by race.Segregation on campusThe University of Alabama, for example, is endorsing a Goldman Sachs-backed “diversity” program that benefits black, Hispanic, Native American and LGBT students, but excludes other groups. White? Asian? Straight? You’re not welcome.At the University of Colorado Boulder, a special retreat is available only to students "whose identity community/ies have been minoritized" in science, technology, engineering and math. Nor was it about special problems faced by “minoritized” students.As Campus Reform reports, “Activities at the event were centered around career development and networking, and not specific to minority experiences. They included creating research and teaching portfolios, coming up with questions to ask during interviews, networking with existing CU faculty, and learning the differences between types of faculty careers.” How exactly is the scientific consensus that “there is no scientific basis for race” leading to this? You said someone was leading us to a separate society I showed you whoBut enjoy the book by political scientist Charles Murray and his conversation with Bill Kristol. I, for one, can’t wait for when you figure out these people think multiculturalism doesn’t work and we need separate but equal societies. The culture warrior fighting college students is the real hero. People saying black people are dumber than white people because of their *equal* genetics, you don’t say shit. People praising Stefan Molyneux who advocates for separate but equal, you don’t say shit. But college kids college kids saying this is how it’s always been for white kids, that it allows them to not feel like and outnumbered minority and brave Race comes thundering in. Can’t say I’m surprised you’d pick your fight with college kids though, fascists love to punch down. It’s the college kids and administrators on your team pushing for “safe spaces” that exclude white students.You skipped right over everything posted about neo-segregation pushed by modern Leftists. But but Stefan Somebody!!https://twitter.com/campusreform/status/693634839371763713?s=21 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/blacks-dorm-uconn/Oh look it’s completely not true. A 60 year old man calling himself the little guy vs college students, lies about segregation, the culture war ladies and gentlemen.
Oh look another lie about Cal Statehttps://www.snopes.com/news/2016/09/07/csula-segregated-housing/What a bunch of hero’s. Is there any lie you won’t fight to the death for?
