Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Denver replaced police with healthcare workers
Comments
-
In a year or so I'd say biden. But right now? They've got no one.
-
You have written many ignorant things, but this one is the winner. Kudos.TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
-
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit. -
It's also NOT in the best interest of the social workers to call for police assistance. Doing so would prove their involvement was ineffective and be counterproductive to their continued employment.greenblood said:
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit.
How many incidents resulted in the social workers simply walking away? How many of those calls required subsequent intervention? All 748 were without any additional law enforcement intervention required?
Bullshit. That is statistically impossible.
-
They probably were, but that 748 number was driven from a much larger number. Kobe worded it in a way to make it seem significant.PurpleThrobber said:
It's also NOT in the best interest of the social workers to call for police assistance. Doing so would prove their involvement was ineffective and be counterproductive to their continued employment.greenblood said:
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit.
How many incidents resulted in the social workers simply walking away? How many of those calls required subsequent intervention? All 748 were without any additional law enforcement intervention required?
Bullshit. That is statistically impossible. -
In the real world, we call that 'lying'.greenblood said:
They probably were, but that 748 number was driven from a much larger number. Kobe worded it in a way to make it seem significant.PurpleThrobber said:
It's also NOT in the best interest of the social workers to call for police assistance. Doing so would prove their involvement was ineffective and be counterproductive to their continued employment.greenblood said:
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit.
How many incidents resulted in the social workers simply walking away? How many of those calls required subsequent intervention? All 748 were without any additional law enforcement intervention required?
Bullshit. That is statistically impossible.
-
Come on, that’s his truth. There is no such thing as objective truth.greenblood said:
They probably were, but that 748 number was driven from a much larger number. Kobe worded it in a way to make it seem significant.PurpleThrobber said:
It's also NOT in the best interest of the social workers to call for police assistance. Doing so would prove their involvement was ineffective and be counterproductive to their continued employment.greenblood said:
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit.
How many incidents resulted in the social workers simply walking away? How many of those calls required subsequent intervention? All 748 were without any additional law enforcement intervention required?
Bullshit. That is statistically impossible. -
You wrote that with a straight face?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
You write that with a straight face. Fuck off with your fake news bullshit.
For all your want of a populist agenda, you sure have a way of demanding actions that ultimately localize power for those that don't want populism. TKSFS.
-
This is a bored that doesn’t push back, and in fact many embrace it, when Bob talks about race science. The fact that you think me and Dazzler are the dumbest posters, says a lot more about you than it does us.greenblood said:
There is so much stupid in this post. Where to begin?TheKobeStopper said:
Good news! Of the 748 calls the program went on, ZERO arrests were made! That’s 748 times the police department was freed up from going on welfare checks, it’s a shame they weren’t able to use that time to make the city safer. But, you know, crime goes up when your president dumpsters the economy because he hates science.LebamDawg said:and these numbers might reflect that brilliant decision
https://www.homesnacks.com/co/denver-crime/
and a visual
Seriously Kobe, do you read your posts before you click “post comment”? You might be the dumbest person I’ve ever seen here, and that includes Dazzler.
You realize police are there to enforce the law. That happens when there’s a crime. Police in large part don’t prevent crimes, they respond to them you dumb shit.
If you don’t believe police prevent crime, I suggest you take it up with the people arguing that less police equals more crime. -
The presence of a functioning police force is a component of crime prevention, as are dual-parent families, access to education, and steady employment.
The police respond to crimes in progress or those that have already occurred 99% of the time. Their role in crime prevention is through early intervention with youths and their active presence within a community.
This isn’t that fucking hard, guys.
