Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

McConnell will vote to acquit Trump

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,890 Founders Club
edited February 2021 in Tug Tavern
What an unprincipled corrupt hack

He just knows which way the wind is blowing.
«1

Comments

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Fuck McConnell. I want my five bucks back
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,371
    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,662 Founders Club
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    HHusky said:

    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

    Eat rat poison. All of it
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,371
    doogie said:

    HHusky said:

    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

    Eat rat poison. All of it
    It's true what they say.

    So far, it's only made me stronger.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    HHusky said:

    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

    The “judge” is a juror who voted previously to convict the defendant. This was an illegitimate show trial. Only morons are defending it.

    Such as you.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,371

    HHusky said:

    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

    The “judge” is a juror who voted previously to convict the defendant. This was an illegitimate show trial. Only morons are defending it.

    Such as you.
    We already had that vote, Boris.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,371
    edited February 2021

    HHusky said:

    Many if not most acquittal votes will argue that it's unconstitutional--not that they approve of Daddy's actions.

    In Mitch's case, of course, he created the fact he relies upon.

    Prove it in a court of law was the order of the day here so feel free to shut the fuck up now

    You lost

    Again

    No court has proven any of your conspiracy theories, Q
    The Senate can vote to acquit or convict on any burden of proof it chooses. #Constitution

    Further, where besides the Senate can a federal official be tried for violating his oath of office?

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    It isn’t an Impeachment trial.

    Judge said so.