Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Official we dodged a bullet thread

2

Comments

  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    The Seattle times has been on fire of late. Epic entertainment.

    Yes, Mora's disaster season of 9 wins, playing in the PAC-12 championship, and a bowl in year one with a freshman QB is clearly way worse than 7 wins in yr 4 with a loss two WSU and BSU to end the year of incremental progress.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dick_B
    Dick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    RaceBannon said:

    TommySQC said:

    I believe 6-7 would get him fired. 7-6 would not and for anyone to declare 8-5 would is laughable. The bar remains @ 7.

    this thread has some great posts. You guys are my favorite group of posters

    Classy reply. I always enjoy your posts
    SQCKA
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    MikeDamone said:

    Not a scientific poll, but as I spent time with family and friends over the last few weeks, almost every single one of them thinks sark is doing a great job and are shocked when I say he needs to be fired now. They point to things like graduation rates (myth), lack of off field problems (myth), and success on the field (myth) as reason to keep him. These conversations at astonishing and I really have no comeback. There are maybe 2 people that agree with my line of thinking. Bottom like is most people I know don't give a fuck. They like the Huskies, but are not invested in anyway. They are even Tyee members. They just don't care anymore.

    Well, maybe its the typical fans who have returned expectations to normal but perhaps those on the edges who are not invested approve of Sark so far.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MelloDawg
    MelloDawg Member Posts: 6,917
    RaceBannon said:

    TommySQC said:

    I believe 6-7 would get him fired. 7-6 would not and for anyone to declare 8-5 would is laughable. The bar remains @ 7.

    this thread has some great posts. You guys are my favorite group of posters

    Classy reply. I always enjoy your posts
    Lots of sexual tension going on right here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,850 Founders Club
    I sat with my dad today and talked with him. He and I disagreed, as he thinks if Sark goes 7-6 next year his job will be in jeopardy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    ACSlaterDawg said:


    You are stuck in 2007 with this fan base and admin. Expectations are much higher and the admin cares. Woodward got what was needed to allow the hiring of better asst coaches. You never would have expected that.

    [citation needed]


    Tighten it up Tequilla.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    edited December 2012
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    ACSlaterDawg said:


    You are stuck in 2007 with this fan base and admin. Expectations are much higher and the admin cares. Woodward got what was needed to allow the hiring of better asst coaches. You never would have expected that.

    [citation needed]


    Tighten it up Tequilla.



    Citation? Extra money for new asst coaches, pushing through a new stadium. To say there hasn't been a change there is just ignoring facts.

    Yes, we all know Sark wasn't a great hire but at the time EVERYONE said no (Muschamp, Kelly, Meyer, Wittingham, etc), leaving few options.......we can lay that at the feet of a man who was born ballless, Mark Emmert who was responsible for 0-12.

    Now the next step for Woodward is 1) push Sark out and promote Wilcocks ala what Oregon did with Chip/Belotti or 2) tell Sark he has to give up the OC position because he fucking sucks.

    As for Sark, I think his seat will be very hot if he only wins 8 next year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    The myth is everyone said no.

    Wilcox? Why in the hell would we want another experiment? Wilcox hasn't proven anything. Just like the team sark inherited, Wilcox inherited talent that was being coached by the bottom of the barrel. Most average DCs could have done what Wilcox did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    DerekJohnson said:

    I sat with my dad today and talked with him. He and I disagreed, as he thinks if Sark goes 7-6 next year his job will be in jeopardy.

    My Wife turned to me after we lost the AC and Bowel Game and said, "thank gawd, we have Sark as our coach."

    Two very special moments, of which I will have classy, fond memories from the 2012 season.

    bitches
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    MikeDamone said:

    The myth is everyone said no.

    Wilcox? Why in the hell would we want another experiment? Wilcox hasn't proven anything. Just like the team sark inherited, Wilcox inherited talent that was being coached by the bottom of the barrel. Most average DCs could have done what Wilcox did.

    Agree. Part 1 of this argument makes zero sense. If the myth is true that no one wanted the job, at least you can credit Sark with getting us to a point that top coaches would at least consider? Why the fuck would we hire ANOTHER coordinator with zero head coaching experience?

    Leach? Did he say no, and then agree to live in fucking Pulman?

    We know what happened with fag boy and his lawn jockey - they threw out insulting offers to coaches worth more, per upper campus's request, and the job quickly became unattractive to those in the know.

    You are correct on point 2: Sark has to hire an OC. This should be non-negotiable. We'll see - not sure what the timeline is on hiring AC's.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter