Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

City of Long Beach forces Grocery Stores to boost employee pay by $4.00 and hour...

1235»

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,729 Founders Club

    Apparently the term "subsidy" is new to you, @TheKobeStopper

    Let’s get rid of farming subsidies and see how that 30% of America’s wealth in red counties holds up.
    OK I'm in. Most subsidies go to mega farm Biden donors anyway
    Convenient timing.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/12/31/790261705/farmers-got-billions-from-taxpayers-in-2019-and-hardly-anyone-objected
    So not mega farm Biden donors.

    The "trade war" with China, in which I was rooting for the US, did cause some damage and it was paid for

    You didn't complain when Obama launched an ethanol boondoggle either. Funny how that works

    Like I said, I agree with you, cut them out
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter

    Biggest scam is ethanol. Both parties are in on the scam. Billions to Iowa and Midwest millionaire corn farmers.

    There it is. Amazing so many Bidenrubes still can't see it.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    edited February 2021
    SFGbob said:

    Apparently the term "subsidy" is new to you, @TheKobeStopper

    Let’s get rid of farming subsidies and see how that 30% of America’s wealth in red counties holds up.
    OK I'm in. Most subsidies go to mega farm Biden donors anyway
    Convenient timing.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/12/31/790261705/farmers-got-billions-from-taxpayers-in-2019-and-hardly-anyone-objected
    I object. You think Biden is going to end them? Btw, how much subsidies do potato farmers receive?
    I don’t know, some idiot wore a “make potato’s great again” hat to Trump signing a $16 billion farm aid package so he probably got something.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,729 Founders Club
    https://thoughtco.com/us-farm-subsidies-3325162


    In 1930, according to the USDA Census of Agriculture Historical Archive, nearly 25% of the population—roughly 30,000,000 people—lived on the nation's nearly 6.5 million farms and ranches. The original intent of U.S. farm subsidies was to provide economic stability to farmers during the Great Depression and ensure a steady domestic food supply for Americans.

    Me - I laughed because once a government program is in it is damn near impossible to get out


    However, by 2017, the number of people living on farms had dwindled to about 3.4 million and the number of farms just over two million. These data suggest it's more difficult than ever to make a living farming—hence the need for subsidies, according to proponents.

    The U.S. government presently pays about $25 billion in cash annually to farmers and owners of farmland. Congress typically legislates the number of farm subsidies through five-year farm bills. The Agricultural Act of 2014 (the Act), also known as the 2014 Farm Bill, was signed by President Obama on February 7, 2014.

    Like its predecessors, the 2014 farm bill was derided as bloated pork-barrel politics by a plethora of Congress members, both liberals, and conservatives, who hail from non-farming communities and states. However, the powerful farm industry lobby and members of Congress from agriculture-heavy states won out.

    Farm subsidies don't benefit all farms equally. According to the Cato Institute, farmers of corn, soybeans, and wheat receive more than 70% of farm subsidies. These are also usually the largest farms.

    While the general public may believe that the majority of subsidies go to helping small family operations, the primary beneficiaries are instead the largest producers of certain commodities:

    "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations. Small commodity farmers qualify for a mere pittance, while producers of meat, fruits, and vegetables are almost completely left out of the subsidy game."


    Me - the subsidies go to export crops that are subject to tariffs and trade wars and stuff.

    According to the Environmental Working Group, from 1995 through 2016, reports the seven states received the majority of subsidies, nearly 45% of all benefits paid to farmers. Those states and their respective shares of total U.S. farm subsidies were:

    Texas - 9.6%
    Iowa - 8.4%
    Illinois - 6.9%
    Minnesota - 5.8%
    Nebraska - 5.7%
    Kansas - 5.5%
    North Dakota - 5.3%


    Me - I winged it on the Biden donor smack and got busted. But now you have the rest of the story

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Apparently the term "subsidy" is new to you, @TheKobeStopper

    Let’s get rid of farming subsidies and see how that 30% of America’s wealth in red counties holds up.
    OK I'm in. Most subsidies go to mega farm Biden donors anyway
    Convenient timing.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/12/31/790261705/farmers-got-billions-from-taxpayers-in-2019-and-hardly-anyone-objected
    I object. You think Biden is going to end them? Btw, how much subsidies do potato farmers receive?
    I don’t know, some idiot wore a “make potato’s great again” to Trump signing a $16 billion farm aid package so he probably got something.
    Bzzzzt, wrong. Potatoes, like most crops receive no Federal subsidies. So they "probably" got nothing. Funny how a guy with such superior education was ignorant of that fact. Now maybe you can take a stab at the question you're dodging like a Kunt.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,729 Founders Club
    Many industries are struggling during this pandemic, particularly the agricultural supply chain. In order to help, Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue announced that 470 million dollars would be used to purchase a wide variety of products in separate markets. The money would assist in supporting struggling agricultural producers due to the disruption of the markets due to the Coronavirus.

    Fifty million dollars will be designated towards the potato industry, especially since they have been losing a great deal of their income. The aid will assist in getting potatoes back out onto the food-service pipeline.


    ITS A PANDEMIC EVERYONE GETS PAID
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited February 2021
    Covid Aid is not a Crop subsidy and if you're going to start counting that as a federal subsidy then every fucking business in the country received a federal "subsidy."

    Dumb as dog shit and twice as dishonest. Why are you such a Kunt that you can't answer the question about Poverty Kobe?

    Come on, I'm educationally "subnormal" you should be able to wipe the floor with me.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    So they do take federal money?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    So they do take federal money?

    Just like every other business in the country did. You really want to die on this disingenuous hill?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,729 Founders Club

    So they do take federal money?

    People are dying of covid and you want to argue this?
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    So they do take federal money?

    People are dying of covid and you want to argue this?
    Only old people with pre existing conditions. Our death panels have deemed their deaths as acceptable.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    So they do take federal money?

    People are dying of covid and you want to argue this?
    Only old people with pre existing conditions. Our death panels have deemed their deaths as acceptable.
    Kobe taps out.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,729 Founders Club

    So they do take federal money?

    People are dying of covid and you want to argue this?
    Only old people with pre existing conditions. Our death panels have deemed their deaths as acceptable.
    More young women for me
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    edited February 2021
    SFGbob said:

    So they do take federal money?

    Just like every other business in the country did. You really want to die on this disingenuous hill?
    I’m not dying on anything. I don’t even know why we’re talking about potato’s. I just thought this was funny.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    So they do take federal money?

    Just like every other business in the country did. You really want to die on this disingenuous hill?
    I’m not dying on anything. I don’t even know why we’re talking about potato’s. I just thought this was funny.
    We're talking about potatoes because you're a fucking moron who thinks that all Red agricultural counties receive crop subsides.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    So they do take federal money?

    Just like every other business in the country did. You really want to die on this disingenuous hill?
    I’m not dying on anything. I don’t even know why we’re talking about potato’s. I just thought this was funny.
    We're talking about potatoes because you're a fucking moron who thinks that all Red agricultural counties receive crop subsides.
    Strawman.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    SFGbob said:

    So they do take federal money?

    Just like every other business in the country did. You really want to die on this disingenuous hill?
    I’m not dying on anything. I don’t even know why we’re talking about potato’s. I just thought this was funny.
    We're talking about potatoes because you're a fucking moron who thinks that all Red agricultural counties receive crop subsides.
    Strawman.
    Yeah, strawman.

    Let’s get rid of farming subsidies and see how that 30% of America’s wealth in red counties holds up.


    A liar and a moron, nice work Kobe.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    Saying removing farming subsidies would hurt wealth in red counties isn’t the same as saying all red agricultural counties receive crop subsidies. Hence, strawman.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    Saying removing farming subsidies would hurt wealth in red counties isn’t the same as saying all red agricultural counties receive crop subsidies. Hence, strawman.

    Saying that removing farming subsidies would impact the wealth of "red counties" when the overwhelming majority of all red counties don't receive a dime in Federal Crop subsidies just shows you to be an ignorant fool with a big mouth. Denying you were claiming this just show that you're a liar. And of course you still are dodging the question about poverty you were asked so you can add coward to the list.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter

    So they do take federal money?

    Sometimes it's best to just take the L.

    This is one of those times.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    SFGbob said:

    Saying removing farming subsidies would hurt wealth in red counties isn’t the same as saying all red agricultural counties receive crop subsidies. Hence, strawman.

    Saying that removing farming subsidies would impact the wealth of "red counties" when the overwhelming majority of all red counties don't receive a dime in Federal Crop subsidies just shows you to be an ignorant fool with a big mouth. Denying you were claiming this just show that you're a liar. And of course you still are dodging the question about poverty you were asked so you can add coward to the list.
    Alright let’s try this very slowly.

    For farms that take government subsidies, what color county do you think the majority of them exist in? Red or blue?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    SFGbob said:

    Saying removing farming subsidies would hurt wealth in red counties isn’t the same as saying all red agricultural counties receive crop subsidies. Hence, strawman.

    Saying that removing farming subsidies would impact the wealth of "red counties" when the overwhelming majority of all red counties don't receive a dime in Federal Crop subsidies just shows you to be an ignorant fool with a big mouth. Denying you were claiming this just show that you're a liar. And of course you still are dodging the question about poverty you were asked so you can add coward to the list.
    Alright let’s try this very slowly.

    For farms that take government subsidies, what color county do you think the majority of them exist in? Red or blue?
    Retreat!!!!! The overwhelming majority of all Red counties don't receive a dime of Federal Crop subsidy. Until today, you didn't know this and you didn't know that only a handful of crops get Federal support. Fuck off.
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    By your own admission, they’ve all received federal support.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183

    By your own admission, they’ve all received federal support.

    Yeah, there are people living in those Red Counties that draw Social Security checks. I guess your bullshit really was true.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited February 2021
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    SFGbob said:

    Saying removing farming subsidies would hurt wealth in red counties isn’t the same as saying all red agricultural counties receive crop subsidies. Hence, strawman.

    Saying that removing farming subsidies would impact the wealth of "red counties" when the overwhelming majority of all red counties don't receive a dime in Federal Crop subsidies just shows you to be an ignorant fool with a big mouth. Denying you were claiming this just show that you're a liar. And of course you still are dodging the question about poverty you were asked so you can add coward to the list.
    Alright let’s try this very slowly.

    For farms that take government subsidies, what color county do you think the majority of them exist in? Red or blue?
    Medina. Blue.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Kaepsknee said:

    Kaepsknee said:

    Bob_C said:

    Sure, likely true. You want to make them even poorer with federal policy.

    Totally. That’s why all the richest states are blue and the poorest states are red, our terrible economic policies that make people even poorer.
    Our?

    Kreist. If you live in a big city than everything is more expensive and wages are then, naturally higher. That’s where the min wage is already close to $15 an hour. And every big city outside of Texas is blue. The rest have been Governed by Democrats for decades. Tell me how these rich blue states have done anything to lift people out of poverty?
    What poverty? They’re all fat and have iPhones.
    Is it the TDS or just some later onset syphylis that drives your thought process?
    No slut shaming.
    U B da Ho. So the judges will allow.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Tequilla said:

    All the money in the country is in blue states.

    All the money in red states is in blue cities.

    All those red counties that republicans love to point out during presidential elections equals 30% of this countries wealth. 2500 counties out of 3000.

    This is the worlds lone super power, a couple years ago we had the greatest economy in history and it was all blue. You are the economic crumbs we wipe off on our pants.

    Since you're so smart, care to explain why so many businesses are relocating to Texas?
    Once they’ve used all the resources in blue states to become successful why do they move to a place that lowers taxes to entice them there? That’s seriously your question?

    Why are there so many more businesses becoming successful in blue states to begin with?
    Northern California and Western Washington happens to be where the tech giants happen to be. It doesn’t make any of those areas special with special people. Fuck without the Microsoft and its trickle down and Amazon, Seattle would be fucking Everett now that Boeing is all but gone.