Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Someone told me they were too scared
HHusky
Member Posts: 24,527
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
May as well call Elizabeth Warren as a witness since she said the same things in 2019.HHusky said:of the discovery process to ever do this.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/smartmatic-sues-fox-news-giuliani-and-sidney-powell-for-2-7-billion-over-false-election-claims/ar-BB1doxX1?ocid=entnewsntp
When even the voting machine companies are this partisan in who defames them, it’s going to be a bumpy road ahead. -
Diebold should have sued in 2004
-
In 2017 CNN was running stories on how easy it was to compromise electronic voting machines
-
0 and 2 ladies.
Protect the plate! -
Your team's statements weren't generalized concerns. They were very specific.NorthwestFresh said:
Hugo Chavez's deposition will be yuge! -
There are specific concerns in the Warren accusations.HHusky said:
Your team's statements weren't generalized concerns. They were very specific.NorthwestFresh said:
Hugo Chavez's deposition will be yuge!
Two Americas. -
You'll all be dead before this sees a courtroom but let justice run its course. Both parties have accused Dominion of being shady no matter how hard you spin it so let's find out
I thought Powell would be disbarred by now but like doctors, lawyers protect their own -
Imagine having such a fragile sense of confidence in your political belief that you need to go all in protecting a South American IT company from audit
-
https://dailywire.com/news/5-things-you-need-know-about-diebold-voting-aaron-bandler
The internet is hell on leftist liars
1. The origins of Diebold voting machine came from a push for electronic voting that occurred after the chaos of the 2000 presidential election. The controversy surrounded “hanging chads,” which were the result of “a half-punched piece of chaff rather than a clean cut” from a “readable punch-card ballots,” according to Bloomberg, when it came to the Florida recount in that election. The result was a push for electronic voting to avoid a repeat of that anarchy by using voting machines like Diebold, which allow people to vote via touch screen. However, such a push opened the door for leftist conspiracy theories in the subsequent presidential election.
2. Diebold conspiracy theories began percolating in 2003. CBS News reported at the time:
First, there are the three companies that make computer voting machines: Diebold, Sequoia and Election Systems and Software (ES&S), all of which are owned by big GOP contributors. Walden O’Dell, Diebold’s CEO, for example, has signed on as a Bush/Cheney Pioneer, promising to raise at least $100,000 for the campaign.
Second are the charges of dirty tricks: Using computer software purchased under proprietary contracts that make it illegal to examine the equipment, votes for Democrats are lost, changed or disqualified.
Third are the paybacks: Republicans get into office, perpetuate the fraud and help advance the causes and stuff the pocketbooks of right-wing Americans.
The report goes on to cite leftists warning that “the electoral ‘fix’ is in” as a result of the supposed “GOP control of computer voting machines.” This set the stage for the next stage.
3. Leftists whined that Diebold voting machines stole the election in 2004. Michelle Malkin explained in a 2006 column about how Teresa Heinz, John Kerry’s wife, blamed Bush winning re-election “on rigged Diebold voting machines” based on the belief that “two brothers own 80 percent of the machines used in the United States” and they were “very easy to hack.”
“Asked for evidence of her “mother machine”-hacking theory, the ketchup heiress refused further comment,” Malkin wrote. “But a cacophony of conspiracy theorists and mainstream Democrats have since taken up Kerry’s moonbat baton, from Truther types to Black Box paranoiacs to Hillary Clinton.”
Maybe mix some truth in next time Hack
