Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seahawks release Keith Price.
Comments
-
It's a shame no one ever talks about Huskie football here.
I would have fired Sark for not getting to fucking work the day he was hired, but I wouldn't have hired him in the first place. -
I went to the Holiday Bowl and it was obvious Nebraska mailed it in. Everyone knew they didn't want to be there while the UW players were pumped to finally be in a bowl. It was still cool that they blew us out and we beat them to end the season. I honestly thought we were going to get plungered walking into the game.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired.
I fully understand what you are saying and the Stanford game was shit. I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win. I saw some stuff that made me optimistic, especially Ta'Amu and Jamora. Ta'Amu looked like an All American that day and I was pumped he was returning the next season. Also liked Sark's commitment to the run that he showed not only in that game, but the last 3-4 games of 2011.
In hindsight you are right, but I hoped and expected Sark to turn 7-6 into 9 or 10, to contending for a Rose Bowl. That's what should have happened. He fell well short of that, not only record wise, but getting plungered multiple times every season. I've already said the Arizona and Stanford games were bad signs, but the end of the season made me a little bit optimistic. I certainly didn't want him fired at the time. -
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired.
-
If you can't see the difference between 7-6 in 2010 vs 7-6 in 2011 and 2012, I can't help you. 5-7-9-10 would have been cool. A Rose Bowl or BCS bowl in year 5. 5-7-7-7-8 sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired. -
So you're saying that 7-6 to 7-6 is incremental decline?RoadDawg55 said:
If you can't see the difference between 7-6 in 2010 vs 7-6 in 2011 and 2012, I can't help you.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired. -
According to our AD who everyone on here now loves 2011 was incremental progress over 2010.
-
We should have never seen the 7 and 8 at the end.RoadDawg55 said:
If you can't see the difference between 7-6 in 2010 vs 7-6 in 2011 and 2012, I can't help you. 5-7-9-10 would have been cool. A Rose Bowl or BCS bowl in year 5. 5-7-7-7-8 sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired. -
Couldn't agree more. That's been my point the whole time. I should have made the post awhile ago.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We should have never seen the 7 and 8 at the end.RoadDawg55 said:
If you can't see the difference between 7-6 in 2010 vs 7-6 in 2011 and 2012, I can't help you. 5-7-9-10 would have been cool. A Rose Bowl or BCS bowl in year 5. 5-7-7-7-8 sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired. -
Yea you are usually pretty good about getting to the point. Instead you decided to reach Tequilla territory. I kept expecting you to tell Damone to take the gloves off and get down in a pissing match.RoadDawg55 said:
Couldn't agree more. That's been my point the whole time. I should have made the post awhile ago.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We should have never seen the 7 and 8 at the end.RoadDawg55 said:
If you can't see the difference between 7-6 in 2010 vs 7-6 in 2011 and 2012, I can't help you. 5-7-9-10 would have been cool. A Rose Bowl or BCS bowl in year 5. 5-7-7-7-8 sucks.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs gonna Doog.RoadDawg55 said:
I was still cool with 7-6 and a bowl win.MikeDamone said:
Umm...upset, of course not. But many of us saw that holiday bowl game for what it was. Nebraska was thinking national championship and didn't want to be there. They mailed it in. Credit was given to sark for running Polk, but that game could not overcome the shit he put out that season. 41-0 to Stanford. Seriously?RoadDawg55 said:
I wasn't a poaster back then, but i don't remember anyone being upset about a Holiday Bowl win after years of being shit. It was solid progress at the time. It should have been a stepping stone. Unfortunately, that was as good as it got under Sark.chrisvashon said:Lol. Even race Bannon was on the sark bandwagon after the holiday bowl win.
Year 3 there were plenty of signs, but before that you were just bitter & miserable in your Mom's basement if you wanted Sark fired. -
If nothing else, Keith can always go work with Darron Thomas on his hobby farm.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
