Shocking, a liberal that lies. It's what they do, it's who they are. Btw, did you see how he blamed Trump for the fact that he lied. Never change leftists.
Shocking, a liberal that lies. It's what they do, it's who they are. Btw, did you see how he blamed Trump for the fact that he lied. Never change leftists.
Shocker: Allegedly Unbiased "Journalist," Former Biden Intern, and Would-Be Moderator of Second Debate Admits He... Lied Like Anthony Weiner in Claiming He Was "#HACKED!" —Ace
This is my shocked face.
The Brave Firefighters of the media again caught lying every time they get caught in a jam?
The face you are currently looking at? Is one of shock.
Who would have guessed that a leftwing hack would resort to childish lying to get himself out of a jam.
Also: He then took responsibility... by blaming Trump.
Do you see my face? If it seems familiar, it's because you just saw it two seconds ago.
It is my shocked face, this time with an eighth-turn to the left.
I call it Shocked Blue Steel.
Scully said that when he saw his tweet had created a controversy, "I falsely claimed that my Twitter account had been hacked." Behold, My Face of Shock.
He had been frustrated by Trump�s comments and several weeks of criticism on social media and conservative news outlets about his role as moderator, including attacks directed at his family, he said.
This is a lie. He just lied about the hack, now he's lying about the reasons for the hack.
Sarah Jeong, the outrageously anti-white, anti-male racist at the New York Times, similarly claimed that "bad men on the internet made me say racist shit about white people."
Notice they never quote the "attacks" they claim provoked their own bad behavior. But they always describe them as "attacks" (usually meaning "criticism" or "disagreement") or "death threats" (which often means something like "go die in a fire") or "rape threats" (which usually just means "f*** you" or "s*** my d***").
The "attacks" that they say drove them to lie or write dozens of racist attacks against white people must obviously be very serious things, right? So serious that they would surely screenshot it for possible use by the police, should they become involved in the hunt for these Malefactors.
But for some reason, they can never quote or link or provide screencaptures of these possibly-criminal provocations.
Has this guy been on a fucking roll lately or what. Granted, when your opponents are at best functionally retarded, it makes it easier to rack up the Ws, but still, pretty decent week.
Has this guy been on a fucking roll lately or what. Granted, when your opponents are at best functionally retarded, it makes it easier to rack up the Ws, but still, pretty decent week.
Comments
Damn.
http://ace.mu.nu/
Shocker: Allegedly Unbiased "Journalist," Former Biden Intern, and Would-Be Moderator of Second Debate Admits He... Lied Like Anthony Weiner in Claiming He Was "#HACKED!"
—Ace
This is my shocked face.
The Brave Firefighters of the media again caught lying every time they get caught in a jam?
The face you are currently looking at? Is one of shock.
Who would have guessed that a leftwing hack would resort to childish lying to get himself out of a jam.
Also: He then took responsibility... by blaming Trump.
Do you see my face? If it seems familiar, it's because you just saw it two seconds ago.
It is my shocked face, this time with an eighth-turn to the left.
I call it Shocked Blue Steel.
Scully said that when he saw his tweet had created a controversy, "I falsely claimed that my Twitter account had been hacked."
Behold, My Face of Shock.
He had been frustrated by Trump�s comments and several weeks of criticism on social media and conservative news outlets about his role as moderator, including attacks directed at his family, he said.
This is a lie. He just lied about the hack, now he's lying about the reasons for the hack.
Sarah Jeong, the outrageously anti-white, anti-male racist at the New York Times, similarly claimed that "bad men on the internet made me say racist shit about white people."
Notice they never quote the "attacks" they claim provoked their own bad behavior. But they always describe them as "attacks" (usually meaning "criticism" or "disagreement") or "death threats" (which often means something like "go die in a fire") or "rape threats" (which usually just means "f*** you" or "s*** my d***").
The "attacks" that they say drove them to lie or write dozens of racist attacks against white people must obviously be very serious things, right? So serious that they would surely screenshot it for possible use by the police, should they become involved in the hunt for these Malefactors.
But for some reason, they can never quote or link or provide screencaptures of these possibly-criminal provocations.
That's because they're lying.
Every time.
Every fucking time.
Everything helps