Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

CSPAN suspends Steve Scully for lying about being hacked

2»

Comments

  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 18,209 Standard Supporter
    He was scheduled to be the Biden's lead in the second debate. All you need to know is Chrissy Wallace vouched for Scully's supposed integrity.

    http://ace.mu.nu/

    Shocker: Allegedly Unbiased "Journalist," Former Biden Intern, and Would-Be Moderator of Second Debate Admits He... Lied Like Anthony Weiner in Claiming He Was "#HACKED!"
    —Ace




    This is my shocked face.

    The Brave Firefighters of the media again caught lying every time they get caught in a jam?


    The face you are currently looking at? Is one of shock.


    Who would have guessed that a leftwing hack would resort to childish lying to get himself out of a jam.

    Also: He then took responsibility... by blaming Trump.

    Do you see my face? If it seems familiar, it's because you just saw it two seconds ago.

    It is my shocked face, this time with an eighth-turn to the left.

    I call it Shocked Blue Steel.

    Scully said that when he saw his tweet had created a controversy, "I falsely claimed that my Twitter account had been hacked."
    Behold, My Face of Shock.

    He had been frustrated by Trump�s comments and several weeks of criticism on social media and conservative news outlets about his role as moderator, including attacks directed at his family, he said.

    This is a lie. He just lied about the hack, now he's lying about the reasons for the hack.

    Sarah Jeong, the outrageously anti-white, anti-male racist at the New York Times, similarly claimed that "bad men on the internet made me say racist shit about white people."

    Notice they never quote the "attacks" they claim provoked their own bad behavior. But they always describe them as "attacks" (usually meaning "criticism" or "disagreement") or "death threats" (which often means something like "go die in a fire") or "rape threats" (which usually just means "f*** you" or "s*** my d***").

    The "attacks" that they say drove them to lie or write dozens of racist attacks against white people must obviously be very serious things, right? So serious that they would surely screenshot it for possible use by the police, should they become involved in the hunt for these Malefactors.

    But for some reason, they can never quote or link or provide screencaptures of these possibly-criminal provocations.

    That's because they're lying.

    Every time.

    Every fucking time.
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Lying about being hacked until the FBI called out his lie but hey, there is no such thing as integrity in the Democrat Media.