Perspective
 
            The state of Husky Football:



Comments
- 
            I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons.
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            FUCK perspective.
- 
            
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 I've read this poast half a dozen tims and I keep reading it as "both titties were great" and then I start thinking about chicks where one titty was great but the other one wasn't, and now I need to go watch Total Recall.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 Same. In fact, when I went to read your poast I read it correctly for the first time and went back and was like WTF. Lol.dtd said:
 I've read this poast half a dozen tims and I keep reading it as "both titties were great" and then I start thinking about chicks where one titty was great but the other one wasn't, and now I need to go watch Total Recall.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 I’d even go so far to say both titles were real and spectacular.LawDawg1 said:
 Same. In fact, when I went to read your poast I read it correctly for the first time and went back and was like WTF. Lol.dtd said:
 I've read this poast half a dozen tims and I keep reading it as "both titties were great" and then I start thinking about chicks where one titty was great but the other one wasn't, and now I need to go watch Total Recall.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 Doesn’t the chick in Total Recall have like 3 titties?dtd said:
 I've read this poast half a dozen tims and I keep reading it as "both titties were great" and then I start thinking about chicks where one titty was great but the other one wasn't, and now I need to go watch Total Recall.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            
 Speaking of this quote, I've put some "perspective" up in the Wam.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I’d even go so far to say both titles were real and spectacular.LawDawg1 said:
 Same. In fact, when I went to read your poast I read it correctly for the first time and went back and was like WTF. Lol.dtd said:
 I've read this poast half a dozen tims and I keep reading it as "both titties were great" and then I start thinking about chicks where one titty was great but the other one wasn't, and now I need to go watch Total Recall.Doog_de_Jour said:
 I remember. Both titles were great. I just felt let down by not winning a major bowl game afterwards.Canadawg said:
 Sorry they have 2 conference championships in that time hthDoog_de_Jour said:I tire of these type of statistics. It’s like someone bragging about how many phone numbers they got in the bar, but they haven’t gotten laid in eons. 
 These metrics are a nice start, but if you can’t convert them into titles/bowl wins, what’s the point?
- 
            These perspective type posits are the crap everyone wants to point out when your program is in a downward trend. Denial of the reality we are watching.
- 
            Perspective on the same beach 
 
- 
            
 9 spots below Appalachian State.Canadawg said:I need this but some of you really need this. 
 The state of Husky Football:   
- 
            Why not go back to 2004-2020 and do the numbers?
- 
            
 Or to the VERY beginning of time - 1994.DerekJohnson said:Why not go back to 2004-2020 and do the numbers? 
- 
            
 I believe the most recent years actually tell how a program is doing currently.DerekJohnson said:Why not go back to 2004-2020 and do the numbers? 
 This post was just a reminder for the pro pea patch peopleAtomicDawg said:These perspective type posits are the crap everyone wants to point out when your program is in a downward trend. Denial of the reality we are watching. 
- 
            Who gives a fuck
- 
            imagine being one of the 57k who goes to a ucla football game.
- 
            
 We’ll get there. Not far off.rodmansrage said:imagine being one of the 57k who goes to a ucla football game. 
- 
            This is all so great. Someone should make a t-shirt with those graphics on them.
- 
            The “p” word is a trigger for those of us who’ve locked horns with the lemon trio.
- 
            Don't make me post the utah thread here














