Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
We live in a banana republic, voting machine edition
Comments
-
Your news sources certainly aren’t going to report it. It’s reporting on a factual audit of actual vote tabulations and how unreliable and subjective Dominion software was for the election.MelloDawg said:
Could be true, but when this board turns to quoting OAN.....what a fascinating source to trust. You can count on them to not have press credentials renewed in January for the WH press corps (liberal media, etc etc, yeah I know).Dude61 said:
As for WH press credentials, of course they won’t be renewed. Can’t have anybody asking tough questions of uber-dumbass Jen Psaki as she’s spewing propaganda and lies in the press room. It will be just like when Obama was president. -
A cheated win is a crime and people need to hit the gray bar hotel. I'll take no illegitimated wins. The dems are destroying the records and votes so we can not recount. We hold another election or we overthrow this shit!
-
Bumped because Brad Heath is for imbeciles who are easily confused.
-
Mike Flynn approves!Sledog said:A cheated win is a crime and people need to hit the gray bar hotel. I'll take no illegitimated wins. The dems are destroying the records and votes so we can not recount. We hold another election or we overthrow this shit!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/trump-bonkers-oval-office-meeting-193213342.html -
Yes, without question and CNN sucks.Bob_C said: -
Seems like an objective article. I’d be embarrassed linking this mess but to H, it’s probably Pulitzer-worthy. We need more corrupt prosecutors like Mush Head Mueller and Andrew Weissman.HHusky said:
Mike Flynn approves!Sledog said:A cheated win is a crime and people need to hit the gray bar hotel. I'll take no illegitimated wins. The dems are destroying the records and votes so we can not recount. We hold another election or we overthrow this shit!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/trump-bonkers-oval-office-meeting-193213342.html
—-
Sidney Powell’s insane claims about the election being stolen have left judges across the country shaking and scratching their heads. But during a bonkers Oval Office meeting with her on Friday night, President Trump floated the idea of appointing her as a special counsel investigating voter fraud.
Two sources familiar with the matter confirmed to The Daily Beast that Trump and Powell held the Friday meeting to discuss their baseless theories of mass election fraud -
Bonkers was Roberts screaming they can't hear the case because RIOTS! Odd they've magically stopped. But it's not a conspiracy!
-
CNN has gone off the deep end in a lot of ways and they most definitely are more oriented with the left. If you think they are simply a liberal version of OAN, then I’d recommend reevaluating. I know you don’t think that though.Bob_C said: -
I don’t have a “news source” that I consider mine. I certainly don’t despise FOX news. There’s actually tangible balance there outside the main talking heads. I might argue that CNN has more opinion shows than FOX does.NorthwestFresh said:
Your news sources certainly aren’t going to report it. It’s reporting on a factual audit of actual vote tabulations and how unreliable and subjective Dominion software was for the election.MelloDawg said:
Could be true, but when this board turns to quoting OAN.....what a fascinating source to trust. You can count on them to not have press credentials renewed in January for the WH press corps (liberal media, etc etc, yeah I know).Dude61 said:
As for WH press credentials, of course they won’t be renewed. Can’t have anybody asking tough questions of uber-dumbass Jen Psaki as she’s spewing propaganda and lies in the press room. It will be just like when Obama was president.
The way OAN presents itself, however, is not professional.
As for tough questions, I suppose that’s not what “my news sources” (which isn’t a thing) were asking for the last 4 years, just a bunch of gotcha nonsense. -
MelloDawg said:
CNN has gone off the deep end in a lot of ways and they most definitely are more oriented with the left. If you think they are simply a liberal version of OAN then I’d recommend reevaluating. I know you don’t think that though.Bob_C said:
Somebody didn’t listen to the Zucker conference calls the James O’Keefe recorded and published. No surprise, the least-informed voters are Centrists, although you aren’t a “centrist” in any way I’ve seen here from your posts and downvotes.
