Is it possible that
Comments
-
Good point. Didn't need any moral boosts for this epic year. Wonder how the AD is looking at the basketball team right now. Maybe they can do a covid promotion where $100 gets your name on a Gatorade cup that may be used during a game. (Waiting for my next dono request email)
-
Was thinking about this. Most of the bowls don’t make much from the gates. It’s on tv. Teams likely are not getting wined and dined like normal tears and maybe even just come in the night before to save in lodging and food costs. I have no idea what any of this means though.RaceBannon said:UW and the other opt out teams simply don't want to spend the money on a bowl game? Its generally a losing proposition in a good year. I can't imagine much revenue outside the playoffs or NY6
-
The 180 on playing another game after very recent comments about wanting a bowl made me suspect they were holding out for Alamo and were told Alamo was picking CCG loser or CU.
...and frankly the drop to what else is available after Alamo is big. Twash, really.
-
UW had 4 meaningful games this year and didn't get to play in any. The Apple Cup, Oregon, the Conference Championship, and a good bowl.RaceBannon said:UW and the other opt out teams simply don't want to spend the money on a bowl game? Its generally a losing proposition in a good year. I can't imagine much revenue outside the playoffs or NY6
Saban was right that the Pac-12 ran a JV league this season. -
Other than the Apple Cup, get to's got nothing to do with itwhatshouldicareabout said:
UW had 4 meaningful games this year and didn'tRaceBannon said:UW and the other opt out teams simply don't want to spend the money on a bowl game? Its generally a losing proposition in a good year. I can't imagine much revenue outside the playoffs or NY6
get toplay in any. The Apple Cup, Oregon, the Conference Championship, and a good bowl.
Saban was right that the Pac-12 ran a JV league this season. -
that seems like as plausible as anything. but the money may have been a factor too. if NY6 I think people are interested even if it's cashflow negative. anything else is 'why bother?' and expensive.NoWarningJustDawg said:The 180 on playing another game after very recent comments about wanting a bowl made me suspect they were holding out for Alamo and were told Alamo was picking CCG loser or CU.
...and frankly the drop to what else is available after Alamo is big. Twash, really. -
What about the kids?
-
I never boo themDerekJohnson said:What about the kids?
-
I think UW views football as an extracurricular, no reason to overly invest in the product.
They would be more than happy to join the MWC and clean up with meaningless 8+ win seasons without really trying. -
BC and Pitt both played close to a full schedule and opted out. Pitt wasn't that good but they'd still probably have enough cache to get some shit bowl that still exists in 2020. I'd bet it's financial.
I'm hoping COVID 86s about 18 of these dumb bowls. It's pathetic participation trophy and degenerate gambler bullshit. Trump doesn't approve.







