FBI Has FINALLY Begun Investigating Voter Fraud, Democrats Underestimating Trump Is Their Undoing
Comments
-
-
-
I guess we are at the point where I wonder what KIND of evidence would move the needle for any of you dyed in the wool DNC ideologues. All of the circumstantial evidence(and there are oceans of it) didn’t seem to make any of you pause. Now you have whistleblower after whistleblower coming forward and that doesn’t seem to mean anything to you.
What do you NEED? Does it have to be front page of the NYT or the lead segment on Rachel Maddow to get any of you to at least consider the potential crisis we are seeing unfold?
Or is it, “my team won so I don’t care. The ends justify the means so fuck you.”
I’d really like to know. -
I’ll say this slowly because it’s been repeated a lot. Take. It. To. Court. Get a judge to actually verify the evidence is legit. Win the case. Then I’ll listen. It’s honestly that easy and hasn’t been done once by team trump. Circumstantial evidence not confirmed through the legal system doesn’t mean shit. Witnesses not confirmed through the legal system don’t mean shit.thechatch said:I guess we are at the point where I wonder what KIND of evidence would move the needle for any of you dyed in the wool DNC ideologues. All of the circumstantial evidence(and there are oceans of it) didn’t seem to make any of you pause. Now you have whistleblower after whistleblower coming forward and that doesn’t seem to mean anything to you.
What do you NEED? Does it have to be front page of the NYT or the lead segment on Rachel Maddow to get any of you to at least consider the potential crisis we are seeing unfold?
Or is it, “my team won so I don’t care. The ends justify the means so fuck you.”
I’d really like to know.
HTH
-
It’s like you guys think Twitter videos and 4 chan posts have replaced the legal system in this country.Sledog said: -
Again so much mixed up bullshit in there. What does that even mean? The youth don’t pay taxes? People on the internet don’t pay taxes? People who are legally allowed to vote but prefer to vote by mail shouldn’t be allowed? You’re getting your right-wing propaganda messages all mixed up.thechatch said:
Nah.Duckwithabone said:
So much just wrong with this take.thechatch said:I’m still waiting for someone to tell me why all voting shouldn’t be done in person with identification cards.
If your vote matters to you, you’ll show up, flash ID, and drop it off. If it doesn’t matter to you, you won’t.
And if it doesn’t matter to you, it shouldn’t matter to the rest of us who actually care about the outcome.
We should be restricting absentee ballots. We should be doing away with mail-in voting, which only promotes participation from the unengaged at best, and paves the way for fraud, at worst.
What’s next? Online voting, via an app? I mean get the fuck outta here. We are talking about 1hr out of one day every 4 years. If you can’t be bothered to be there and participate, FUCK OFF.
Let those of us who care make the decisions for you.
If we are being real, only tax-paying citizens should have the right to vote. Instead, we have the well-being of families with mortgages in the hands of a bunch of Twitter activists and social justice warriors, just “engaged” enough to vote by mail, because AOC says it’s cool, but utterly ignorant and clueless as to the realities of adult responsibility due to their total lack of life experience. -
wow this place is a lot different than the main bored. Lotta freaks in the tug.
-
Something. What is the best piece of evidence to date? So far it’s just testimony from dumb people who don’t know how things work and others with wild conspiracy theories.thechatch said:I guess we are at the point where I wonder what KIND of evidence would move the needle for any of you dyed in the wool DNC ideologues. All of the circumstantial evidence(and there are oceans of it) didn’t seem to make any of you pause. Now you have whistleblower after whistleblower coming forward and that doesn’t seem to mean anything to you.
What do you NEED? Does it have to be front page of the NYT or the lead segment on Rachel Maddow to get any of you to at least consider the potential crisis we are seeing unfold?
Or is it, “my team won so I don’t care. The ends justify the means so fuck you.”
I’d really like to know.
-
Ironic.thechatch said:I guess we are at the point where I wonder what KIND of evidence would move the needle for any of you dyed in the wool DNC ideologues. All of the circumstantial evidence(and there are oceans of it) didn’t seem to make any of you pause. Now you have whistleblower after whistleblower coming forward and that doesn’t seem to mean anything to you.
What do you NEED? Does it have to be front page of the NYT or the lead segment on Rachel Maddow to get any of you to at least consider the potential crisis we are seeing unfold?
Or is it, “my team won so I don’t care. The ends justify the means so fuck you.”
I’d really like to know.
-
You already know. Your quote is 100% correct. That's how sheep are.thechatch said:I guess we are at the point where I wonder what KIND of evidence would move the needle for any of you dyed in the wool DNC ideologues. All of the circumstantial evidence(and there are oceans of it) didn’t seem to make any of you pause. Now you have whistleblower after whistleblower coming forward and that doesn’t seem to mean anything to you.
What do you NEED? Does it have to be front page of the NYT or the lead segment on Rachel Maddow to get any of you to at least consider the potential crisis we are seeing unfold?
Or is it, “my team won so I don’t care. The ends justify the means so fuck you.”
I’d really like to know.





