Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rudy! Rudy! Rudy!

2456

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    SFGbob said:

    I'm responsible for claims I've made. You should try it sometime IC instead of being the fucking little coward you are.
    Quote where I've said there has been "mass" voter fraud. Because I can quote you word for fucking word where you claimed Trump's campaign wasn't spied upon.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,746
    edited November 2020

    Plenty of first-hand affidavits are out there.
    Of trivialities at best.

    The meaty stuff is the hearsay.

    And even that stuff is pretty feeble.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    “Pretty please don’t bring up how retarded I was for believing Russian Collusion when Zero evidence was presented.”

    Such a Hoax that the Mueller team never even interviewed the Russian lawyer that Junior “colluded” with at Drumpf Tower because if they had she’d have exposed the involvement of Fusion GPS in that set-up.
    Go read the Senate Intel report. Manafort colluded with Kilimnik. Now let's see proof of the voter fraud that swung the election.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    edited November 2020

    Go read the Senate Intel report. Manafort colluded with Kilimnik. Now let's see proof of the voter fraud that swung the election.
    And yet everything Manafort was charged with had nothing to do with his work on the Trump campaign. Anymore lies you want to tell IC?

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed that nothing in the Dossier had been debunked? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?

    Which is it IC?
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    Plenty of first-hand affidavits are out there. I’m not sure if you realize this, I’m pretty sure you don’t, but the media has nothing to do with the courts deciding on cases other than creating false narratives that dipshits like you run with immediately until you’re yet again shown to be a gullible dipshit.
    Sounds like this has legs! Can't wait for Trump's second inauguration.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    Sounds like this has legs! Can't wait for Trump's second inauguration.
    I would think you Kunts would be calling for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor in order to look into this. That's what you did when Hillary led you fools around by the nose with the Russian collusion fraud.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,865 Founders Club
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:

    And yet everything Manafort was charged with had nothing to do with his work on the Trump campaign. Anymore lies you want to tell IC?

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed that nothing in the Dossier had been debunked? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?

    Which is it IC?
    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed Trump should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 22,746

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed Trump should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?
    blob = Lindsey Graham

    shameless
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    edited November 2020
    HHusky said:

    blob = Lindsey Graham

    shameless
    That's actually a spot on comparison, right down to the obvious closeted homosexuality. Maybe we should start calling Bob "Lady B"
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,865 Founders Club

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed Trump should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?
    Vindicated

    Did you miss it?

    No quid pro quo you tin foil hat wearing moron
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,766 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    A determination that the evidence is insufficient to level charges doesn't mean what you gals think it means.
    Rudy took down the mob and Sydney Powell has a resume a mile long.

    But THE DAZZLER is coming in with his hot legal take.

    OK!

  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,766 Standard Supporter

    Meltdown.

    Where's the mass voter fraud your side has been talking about?
    1:58:00

  • NorthwestFreshNorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    Democrats also giving sworn affidavits for fraud they witnessed. Some Democrats do have integrity, unlike the two BozoBros in this thread.

    https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/read-affidavit-from-democrat-observer-questioning-georgia-ballots/

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed Trump should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?

    Yeah, I recall that. Trump never got what he was asking for and the aid was released anyway so there was no quid pro quo. Now answer the questions you were asked for once in your pathetic life IC.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    Remember when you lied your ass off and claimed Trump should be impeached if there was a quid pro quo with Ukraine? Were you just a gullible dipshit when you made that claim or a fucking liar?
    Btw, this Kunt in this very thread was just crying about how I was deflecting.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117
    SFGbob said:


    Yeah, I recall that. Trump never got what he was asking for and the aid was released anyway so there was no quid pro quo. Now answer the questions you were asked for once in your pathetic life IC.
    So it doesn't count because he attempted a quid pro quo and failed? That's not how the law works, Lady B.
  • insinceredawginsinceredawg Member Posts: 5,117

    Democrats also giving sworn affidavits for fraud they witnessed. Some Democrats do have integrity, unlike the two BozoBros in this thread.

    https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/11/read-affidavit-from-democrat-observer-questioning-georgia-ballots/

    Sounds like this has legs! Keep working those phones Sharyl!
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,865 Founders Club

    So it doesn't count because he attempted a quid pro quo and failed? That's not how the law works, Lady B.
    He was exonerated and vindicated

    Nice tin foil hat
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    So it doesn't count because he attempted a quid pro quo and failed? That's not how the law works, Lady B.
    There was no quid pro quo. Aid wasn't withheld.


    Now what does that have to do with you lying your ass off and claiming nothing in the Dossier had been disproven?
Sign In or Register to comment.