Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Famous Lawyer Says Trump WILL WIN His PA Lawsuit, Democrats Should Not Be Underestimating Trump
DerekJohnson
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,209 
in Tug Tavern
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N46__OwlTN8Comments
-
Now I’m worried.
-
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like? -
No. It’s all about the feels. Mean orange man. Damn the truththechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like?
-
-
Was Dersh wearing underwear when he made this prediction, and were his wife and daughter there, too?
-
It's OK unless it was the GOP then he'd be flapping his hands at supersonic speed.thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like? -
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like? -
So we'll take that as a 'no'. You don't want to know the truth.HHusky said:
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like?
Feels. -
Continue your snipe hunt. Let us know when you get one.PurpleThrobber said:
So we'll take that as a 'no'. You don't want to know the truth.HHusky said:
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like?
Feels. -
Rumors are emails between DNC officials and Dominion have been found on the servers. What they are about is not known.
-
Actual rumors!NorthwestFresh said:Rumors are emails between DNC officials and Dominion have been found on the servers. What they are about is not known.
Big! -
Your fatass has more to worry about than the President of this CountryHHusky said:Now I’m worried.
-
Oh noCuntWaffle said:
Your fatass has more to worry about than the President of this CountryHHusky said:Now I’m worried.
-
Non famous lawyer weighs in.HHusky said:
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like? -
This has legs!NorthwestFresh said:Rumors are emails between DNC officials and Dominion have been found on the servers. What they are about is not known.
-
It's a very simple question. Do you value the truth in all things?HHusky said:
Continue your snipe hunt. Let us know when you get one.PurpleThrobber said:
So we'll take that as a 'no'. You don't want to know the truth.HHusky said:
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like?
Feels.
Or just when it is convenient to your advantage?
-
Evidence? Or proof? Keep moving the goalposts as usual.HHusky said:
It's just those pesky rules requiring evidence that seem to be preventing the exposure of this "large scale election fraud". You're a big fucking patriot for seeing through this absence of any proof and casting doubt on our election. And so likeable too!thechatch said:
Why would you be worried? If he wins, it means that we as a people will have identified and exposed large scale election fraud.HHusky said:Now I’m worried.
Don’t we WANT to know about things like that, or do you prefer it stays in the shadows, as long as your team wins?
Many reasonable person can look at the raw data and come to the conclusion that there are statistically significant variances here. Don’t you want to know what that looks like?
Edit: also hilarious a "legal professional" would conflate the two. -
Spoken like a true fat fuckHHusky said:
Oh noCuntWaffle said:
Your fatass has more to worry about than the President of this CountryHHusky said:Now I’m worried.
-
Your writers aren’t really delivering much by of clever material.CuntWaffle said:
Spoken like a true fat fuckHHusky said:
Oh noCuntWaffle said:
Your fatass has more to worry about than the President of this CountryHHusky said:Now I’m worried.
