Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fraud at the Polls (not)

24567…10

Comments

  • AOG
    AOG Member Posts: 2,844
    doogie said:

    But none of your drivel has anything to do with the video

    OK!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 8,091 Standard Supporter
    This may all be BS or they may be on to something. We will know in a few weeks.

    One thing is for certain, without covid that allowed mail in voting and ballot harvesting. That gave the democrats the tools to enact victory. Well done chi coms well done, you stole and election.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,657 Standard Supporter
    Bendintheriver said:

    Don't you just love to see a fucking rat like AOG demanding that we all just move on? Ha ha ha. 4 years of liberal lies about Russia, claiming Trump stole the election. Now pussies like AOG want us all to just move along.

    Hey AOG, buck up buttercup, you and your fascist thugs have run the patience out of decent Americans. We are not just going to move along at your demand.

    What a fucking hypocritical arrogant ass. They are like immature liberal spawn of hell, "Get off my property" punks.

    The safeties can't be walked up any closer without being offside at the snap.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,015
    edited November 2020
    AOG said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    Keep lying.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/us/politics/as-more-vote-by-mail-faulty-ballots-could-impact-elections.html

    Jimmy Carter singled out absentee ballots as the biggest source of fraud back on the election commission in something like 2005. Everyone knows this, which is why almost all developed countries either don’t allow it or only allow it in very limited capacities.

    And why we a turning into a banana republic.

    Basically the point of that article was only that the *rejection* rate is much higher for mailed in ballots. So what? That reduces fraud. That's good! They also make claims that fraud is easier but they provide scant statistics to back it up. Also, voting by mail is much more accepted now than years ago when this was published.
    They didn't reject any because they banned the observers...Philly rejection rate was 1/30th that of 2016 while the number of mail-in votes was something like 1000x. Atlanta told the observers to go home and counted behind their backs. A good chunk of Nevada's vote went though without any review.

    Keep lying...no point though...the left one...we are a banana republic...it is what it is. Just don't ask me to say 2+2=5.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited November 2020
    Joe Biden’s votes violate Benfords Law (mathematics)

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    edited November 2020
    doogie said:


    As the vote counting for the 2020 Presidential Election continues, various facts suggest rampant frauds in Joe Biden’s votes. So does mathematics in terms of the votes from precincts.

    Benford’s law or the first-digit law, is used to check if a set of numbers are naturally occurring or manually fabricated. It has been applied to detect the voting frauds in Iranian 2009 election and various other applications including forensic investigations.

    https://gnews.org/534248/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,738 Founders Club
    From what I can tell they’ve unleashed a shit ton of data scientists on it, if these benford models are true they should be able to isolate and identify small datasets (counties/etc) to go review.

    So we wait
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,738 Founders Club
    LoneStarDawg said:

    From what I can tell they’ve unleashed a shit ton of data scientists on it, if these benford models are true they should be able to isolate and identify small datasets (counties/etc) to go review.

    So we wait

    And the benford model would show votes without corresponding ballots, not fake ballots. So it’s that Dominion SW scrape issue.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter