Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Election Poll - Call It

1293032343540

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,696 Founders Club
    Biden, but much closer than the poles predicted because polesters are charlatans.
    AS of this AM, Nate's got Trump with 12% chance of winning the EC. So either he's gonna be smoking weed and talking shit or the Tug will. Either way it's gonna be interesting.


  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    Biden in a landslide. Big orange dummy finally bested by geriatric creeper.

    AS of this AM, Nate's got Trump with 12% chance of winning the EC. So either he's gonna be smoking weed and talking shit or the Tug will. Either way it's gonna be interesting.


    He will just do the same thing that all forecasters do... "well I did say there was a ~10% that Trump would win"

    FWIW the betting markets have Trump at 35%
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,696 Founders Club
    Biden, but much closer than the poles predicted because polesters are charlatans.
    Houhusky said:

    AS of this AM, Nate's got Trump with 12% chance of winning the EC. So either he's gonna be smoking weed and talking shit or the Tug will. Either way it's gonna be interesting.


    He will just do the same thing that all forecasters do... "well I did say there was a ~10% that Trump would win"

    FWIW the betting markets have Trump at 35%
    Not too long ago the betting markets were close to 50/50.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,503 Founders Club
    Trump in a tight one because all the poles are bullshit.
    https://reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll/clinton-has-90-percent-chance-of-winning-reuters-ipsos-states-of-the-nation-idUSKBN1322J1

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - With hours to go before Americans vote, Democrat Hillary Clinton has about a 90 percent chance of defeating Republican Donald Trump in the race for the White House, according to the final Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project.

    Her chances are roughly similar to last week’s odds, and any upset by Trump on Tuesday depends on an unlikely combination of turnouts of white, black and Hispanic voters in six or seven states, according to the survey released on Monday.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

    November 9th



  • Houhusky
    Houhusky Member Posts: 5,537
    Biden in a landslide. Big orange dummy finally bested by geriatric creeper.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Biden, but much closer than the poles predicted because polesters are charlatans.
    QUACK!
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,696 Founders Club
    Biden, but much closer than the poles predicted because polesters are charlatans.

    Trump. I don't vote for losers.

    You voted for Obama?
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,278
    Houhusky said:

    Houhusky said:

    The rest of Penn is going harder for Trump this time than 4 years ago...even the African American vote is trending more his way. It really is going to be how many ballots they can print in Philly and print with no signatures to see if they can magically get them counted.

    Some PosiMAGAs do not see the table that is being set...



    NateSilver ejecting the last +Trump favorite pollster (Trafalger) from his very popular "538 modeling" and hinting at all the plus biden polls only being wrong IF trump cheats...

    They are setting the table to create the reality they wish for...
    I’m not a political person, but I do thinks it’s interesting to follow trends in the demographic statistics and data. But if you think Silver kicked out Trafalgar because he doesn’t like them and wants to turn the election.... lol. They posted the first poll they’ve ever had with complete cross tabs on demographics and had Trump winning 28% of the black vote and 29% of democratic votes in Michigan. If you know anything at all about the current political climate, you know how absurd that is. They then took down the crosstabs after getting shit on on twitter. I’ll come right back here and eat crow if either of those numbers is within 10% of the final total. They won’t be. Not saying that the polls won’t be way off, but Trafalgar‘s methodology was certainly not close to sound
    Not political person... then mentions cross tabs that 99% of people what no idea what those even are and explains the "reasoning" perfectly...

    538 themselves reported it last week... https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/trump-is-losing-ground-with-white-voters-but-gaining-among-black-and-hispanic-americans/



    They literally cited UCLA's Nationscape polling that shows Trump closing the gap in Black support from 82 points in 2016 to 71 points this year...

    That was a national poll... The Michigan specific polling with have higher numbers both in black support and cross over support than the national average.

    Getting a positive personal shout out by Trump has a lot more to do with them getting chopped...





    Have to say, this was the first thing that occurred to me as I read the post. Have no idea what the right answer is here; I've not historically been a follower of polling, other than I remember how Trump completely outran them in 2016.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,503 Founders Club
    edited October 2020
    Trump in a tight one because all the poles are bullshit.
    I believe historically polls are pretty accurate

    The science is settled. Trump was an anomaly. Was it the pollsters or the pollees?

    Is he still an anomaly? Stay tuned