Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Twitter and Facebook are the fourth and fifth branches of government, I guess.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Ideals


    Like real liberals have

  • Options
    Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,870
    Photogenic First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Founders Club
    Ben’s too smart for what he does. Going up against him in a debate on any topic would be terrifying.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    Bob_C said:

    Ben’s too smart for what he does. Going up against him in a debate on any topic would be terrifying.

    Short men are tenacious.
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,502
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    Ben’s too smart for what he does. Going up against him in a debate on any topic would be terrifying.

    Ben is fucking annoying 99% of the time and talks so fast you can barely underatand what he is saying. He did his best to help Hillary win in 2016 too.

    But when he's right, he's right.
  • Options
    thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 5,548
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.
  • Options
    HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 19,110
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    Likeable!
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    He said overturning 1st amendment ideals. Wordy and unnecessary but I'm guessing he understands the difference. Twitter can do what they want and I encourage them to keep throwing gas on the fire

    He lost me when he became a never Trumper
  • Options
    HuskyJWHuskyJW Guest, Member Posts: 14,182
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Is that the autistic guy I hear on the radio sometimes?
  • Options
    GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 5,339
    First Comment 5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes
    HuskyJW said:

    Is that the autistic guy I hear on the radio sometimes?

    Yes
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,755
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    He said overturning 1st amendment ideals. Wordy and unnecessary but I'm guessing he understands the difference. Twitter can do what they want and I encourage them to keep throwing gas on the fire

    He lost me when he became a never Trumper
    He stopped being a never Trumper about 3 years ago.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,755
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    The social media giants are in the business of providing a public forum. This needs to be recognized first and foremost.

    If you own a burger shack in Montana, your facilities has to be ADA compliant because it serves the public - theoretically all the public.

    If you are going to be providing a place for the public to congregate - in person or virtually - it needs to serve all the public.


    Look I don't want more government, especially to enforce a 'fairness; doctrine, however BigTech is leaving us? no choice.


  • Options
    SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,060
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    He said overturning 1st amendment ideals. Wordy and unnecessary but I'm guessing he understands the difference. Twitter can do what they want and I encourage them to keep throwing gas on the fire

    He lost me when he became a never Trumper
    Human scum if you axe me.
    Spoken like a true flaming lib.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,173
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    pawz said:

    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    He said overturning 1st amendment ideals. Wordy and unnecessary but I'm guessing he understands the difference. Twitter can do what they want and I encourage them to keep throwing gas on the fire

    He lost me when he became a never Trumper
    He stopped being a never Trumper about 3 years ago.
    Never forget
  • Options
    CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes
    thechatch said:

    While I agree with the premise, Ben loses me when he references 1A

    HH is correct that freedom of speech is limited to protection against government censorship and not private enterprise, and that’s a good thing, for the most part.

    That doesn’t make all of this shit any less disgusting, though, and the people like IC and HH any less shit headed.

    This is true, but it’s about fucking time we remove their monopolistic privileges.

    Fuck those pin headed Silicon Valley ideologues - let those bitches function in a free market like everyone else and knock their asses off their thrown (like they do our statues).

    I fucking hate the tech infestation
Sign In or Register to comment.