Dems and media change definition of packing the court
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
Comments
-
Talking point all morning. Lie to the masses about what “court packing” is, and also, this basically confirms the Communists will add seats to SCOTUS if they can, and if internal polling shows it doesn’t destroy their shit party. Tell a lie often enough...
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/10/11/durbin-republicans-have-been-packing-the-court-for-the-past-three-and-a-half-years-they-brag-about-it/
Durbin: Republicans Have Been Packing the Court for the Past Three-and-a-Half Years — ‘They Brag About It’ -
Another
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-sunday-ben-sasse-chris-coons-judiciary-committee-barrett
Coons says that confirming Barrett 'constitutes court-packing,' Sasse responds that's 'obviously' incorrect -
-
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9. -
‘Hey guise, my side is blatantly lying about court packing and my media is allowing it unchallenged because it could impact voters, but who cares because it may or may not be a big deal to some voters.’MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
Mildly clever? A real media would call out your liars immediately instead of being in on the lies.
-
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/77057/when-will-the-tug-statists-and-centrist-denounce-antifa#latestMelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
You ain't centrist.
-
NTTAWWT
-
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
-
That guy lost in my district in 2010.RaceBannon said:
He sure as hell should be bothered. Maybe that's why he lost... -
Blatant lying and straight up propaganda is "mildly clever." Moderate my fucking ass.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9. -
As The Throbber keeps saying - this propaganda worked in 1930 when communications were print and radio controlled.SFGbob said:
Blatant lying and straight up propaganda is "mildly clever." Moderate my fucking ass.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
Within seconds, every statist/leftist hit piece is debunked by the interwebs.
The voters ain't buying it.
-
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
A lot of dumb shits out there. Hell just look around the board!PurpleThrobber said:
As The Throbber keeps saying - this propaganda worked in 1930 when communications were print and radio controlled.SFGbob said:
Blatant lying and straight up propaganda is "mildly clever." Moderate my fucking ass.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
Within seconds, every statist/leftist hit piece is debunked by the interwebs.
The voters ain't buying it. -
Tug Centrists defense of Biden in light of everything we now know to be true is breathtaking.
-
"Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should ..."
Geezus, you post this as if the kids are making a conscious decision not to take a civics class. The only conscious choice is the decision to not teach a classic civics course to our kids to allow them to be critically thinking functioning citizens. The people who are for indoctrinating our kids that America is racist and liberty and freedom are tools of oppression, and that oppression is a tool for equality are the people you vote for. You love being a tool and a sheep. I don't.
-
Untrue. It should be taught in schools.WestlinnDuck said:"Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should ..."
Geezus, you post this as if the kids are making a conscious decision not to take a civics class. The only conscious choice is the decision to not teach a classic civics course to our kids to allow them to be critically thinking functioning citizens. The people who are for indoctrinating our kids that America is racist and liberty and freedom are tools of oppression, and that oppression is a tool for equality are the people you vote for. You love being a tool and a sheep. I don't. -
but, but, but...
You support the side that removed civics instruction from schools. -
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
MelloDawg writes like he has brain damage.
-
"Not wild on" isn't against it. Hth. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
I thought it was pretty clear. It’s arguing over semantics at this point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild on" isn't against it. Hth. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
And Antifa? Still crickets.MelloDawg said:
I thought it was pretty clear. It’s arguing over semantics at this point.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild on" isn't against it. Hth. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
Dain bramage is bad!Doogles said:MelloDawg writes like he has brain damage.
-
Perception >>> Reality 101RaceBannon said: -
Our teachers make sure that the students only think as a group think entity. They can't have kids learning and thinking on their own, it is more important to make decisions based on feelings. other people's feelings.WestlinnDuck said:"Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should ..."
Geezus, you post this as if the kids are making a conscious decision not to take a civics class. The only conscious choice is the decision to not teach a classic civics course to our kids to allow them to be critically thinking functioning citizens. The people who are for indoctrinating our kids that America is racist and liberty and freedom are tools of oppression, and that oppression is a tool for equality are the people you vote for. You love being a tool and a sheep. I don't.
Just like the Dems in the senate hearings today - they want everyone's feeling to sway the votes for no confirmation. Guilt trips rule -
Pretty much the Dimocrat strategy latelyLebamDawg said:
Our teachers make sure that the students only think as a group think entity. They can't have kids learning and thinking on their own, it is more important to make decisions based on feelings. other people's feelings.WestlinnDuck said:"Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should ..."
Geezus, you post this as if the kids are making a conscious decision not to take a civics class. The only conscious choice is the decision to not teach a classic civics course to our kids to allow them to be critically thinking functioning citizens. The people who are for indoctrinating our kids that America is racist and liberty and freedom are tools of oppression, and that oppression is a tool for equality are the people you vote for. You love being a tool and a sheep. I don't.
Just like the Dems in the senate hearings today - they want everyone's feeling to sway the votes for no confirmation. Guilt trips rule -
Why do you pretend you’re a centrist?MelloDawg said:
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many. -
It’s a trolling bored meme at this point. @MelloDawg is a raging Leftist fag no offense intended as a fellow Centrist.RoadDawg55 said:
Why do you pretend you’re a centrist?MelloDawg said:
But I did say I was against it, as a centrist.UW_Doog_Bot said:
"Not wild" if you were an actual centrist you'd be against this vehemently as a form of extremism that will erode our democracy. Fuck off.MelloDawg said:
Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should, otherwise they may feel the same way. As a centrist, I’m not wild on increasing the number of justices. It’ll just go back and forth over the decades until there are 51 justices on the SCOTUS.WestlinnDuck said:
I remember taking basic US civics in public school. They told us about the three co-equal branches of our representative government that came from this written document called the US Constitution. Destroying the Supreme Court based on a congressional vote seems like a critical issue to me. I also remember that FDR was heavily criticized for just talking about it, let alone doing it. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.MelloDawg said:
The informed centrist in me acknowledges that it’s a clear attempt by the left to redefine “court packing,” it’s mildly clever, but I’m curious for how many this is a critical issue.NorthwestFresh said:Their low-info idiotic consumers don’t know what it means so now if you confirm your party’s nominee, it’s “packing the court.”
Trump needs to ask Biden in the next debate if he’s in favor of adding more justice to SCOTUS beyond the current panel of 9.
I think the confirmation of ACB is a hotter button issue than court packing for many.
He’s a young @HHusky. -
And you need to "think" along racial, gender and sexual orientation lines. Black people need to all think the same. Just like gay people and Hispanic people.LebamDawg said:
Our teachers make sure that the students only think as a group think entity. They can't have kids learning and thinking on their own, it is more important to make decisions based on feelings. other people's feelings.WestlinnDuck said:"Sadly, not as many kids take civics now as they should ..."
Geezus, you post this as if the kids are making a conscious decision not to take a civics class. The only conscious choice is the decision to not teach a classic civics course to our kids to allow them to be critically thinking functioning citizens. The people who are for indoctrinating our kids that America is racist and liberty and freedom are tools of oppression, and that oppression is a tool for equality are the people you vote for. You love being a tool and a sheep. I don't.
Just like the Dems in the senate hearings today - they want everyone's feeling to sway the votes for no confirmation. Guilt trips rule
