pacific twelve media pole
Comments
-
Garbers and superior culturerodmansrage said: -
We? deserve it with our? cuck upper campus, cuck AD, and cuck head coaches.
-
True. But we are no more cuckoldish than Cal. But still.... we always lose to Cal until we don't.PurpleBaze said:We? deserve it with our? cuck upper campus, cuck AD, and cuck head coaches.
-
Better than last year!
-
SoYou'reSayingThere'sAChance.gif
-
Now that we know that USC and UCLA can survive without playing Cal and Stanford every year we? should go forward with a balanced schedule for the North and South with no special exemption for the 4 California schools
-
NoRaceBannon said:Now that we know that USC and UCLA can survive without playing Cal and Stanford every year we? should go forward with a balanced schedule for the North and South with no special exemption for the 4 California schools
Know your place -
https://pac-12.com/content/football-pac-12-championships
1958 isn't walking through the door sport. I know our place.
-
concur! plus we won a vegas bowel and popped off too!HuskyJW said:Better than last year!
big year, scarves up, mates! -
Wow, so Brownsocks has 2 conference championships for uw. To bad Locker didnt win one.
-
Is this a flame?dOgmaster said:Wow, so Brownsocks has 2 conference championships for uw. To bad Locker didnt win one.
-
Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
-
Cal too high.
-
Browning has the only two wins against Oregon since Cody PickettdOgmaster said:Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
-
Every year I predict 7 wins for you fags. I'm gonna stick to my guns. If only you had sark
-
Let me be clear: we? will go 0-6 until we don’t. This is not a “we? should’ve been picked higher!” post
But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season? -
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
-
It makes a ton of sense to vote for a team that turned over their entire roster of 2-4 year starters. I'm hearing quarterback and left tackle are just plug and play for Meat though.
It also makes a ton of sense to vote for a team with a shit tier defense and the worst coaching staff in the conference. -
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
-
Lenoir changed his mind and is now returning, so the Oregon secondary isn't in too bad of shape. Lenoir and Mykael Wright will be in the running for the top corner duo in the conference. Losing Holland and Breeze will drop the Ducks from having arguably the top group of safeties in the conference to just being average.AtomicDawg said:
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
-
RaceBannon said:
Browning has the only two wins against Oregon since Reggie WilliamsdOgmaster said:Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
-
Fair although the last one Pickett got hurt and dumbo gilby lined it up and ran it down the duck's throat in the second halfdtd said:RaceBannon said:
Browning has the only two wins against Oregon since Reggie WilliamsdOgmaster said:Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
The win at Autzen the year before was Reggie -
Doog legend Casey Paus breakout gameRaceBannon said:
Fair although the last one Pickett got hurt and dumbo gilby lined it up and ran it down the duck's throat in the second halfdtd said:RaceBannon said:
Browning has the only two wins against Oregon since Reggie WilliamsdOgmaster said:Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
The win at Autzen the year before was Reggie
-
He handed off like a champSources said:
Doog legend Casey Paus breakout gameRaceBannon said:
Fair although the last one Pickett got hurt and dumbo gilby lined it up and ran it down the duck's throat in the second halfdtd said:RaceBannon said:
Browning has the only two wins against Oregon since Reggie WilliamsdOgmaster said:Nope. Wasn’t aware browning had 2. Not many people liked his play. Personally I Iike Locker and wished he could have won one.
The win at Autzen the year before was Reggie -
Oregon added Jordan Happle from Boise State whom Avalos likes a lot. Also, Steve Stephen made some big strides in the offseason. Bennett Williams has already proven he can play at a high level. The group won’t be as good but they aren’t falling back to average. Verone McKinley’s jump from freshman to sophomore year could make the group good.CarlosDanger said:
Lenoir changed his mind and is now returning, so the Oregon secondary isn't in too bad of shape. Lenoir and Mykael Wright will be in the running for the top corner duo in the conference. Losing Holland and Breeze will drop the Ducks from having arguably the top group of safeties in the conference to just being average.AtomicDawg said:
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
-
What do you call the duck equivalent of a doog?
-
Quookdirtysouwfdawg said:What do you call the duck equivalent of a doog?
Pweston, OBK, DJDuck also work -
QPOTDlawsandl said:
Oregon added Jordan Happle from Boise State whom Avalos likes a lot. Also, Steve Stephen made some big strides in the offseason. Bennett Williams has already proven he can play at a high level. The group won’t be as good but they aren’t falling back to average. Verone McKinley’s jump from freshman to sophomore year could make the group good.CarlosDanger said:
Lenoir changed his mind and is now returning, so the Oregon secondary isn't in too bad of shape. Lenoir and Mykael Wright will be in the running for the top corner duo in the conference. Losing Holland and Breeze will drop the Ducks from having arguably the top group of safeties in the conference to just being average.AtomicDawg said:
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
This reads like Doogman circa 2002 -
Quook. They suck until they don’t.lawsandl said:
Oregon added Jordan Happle from Boise State whom Avalos likes a lot. Also, Steve Stephen made some big strides in the offseason. Bennett Williams has already proven he can play at a high level. The group won’t be as good but they aren’t falling back to average. Verone McKinley’s jump from freshman to sophomore year could make the group good.CarlosDanger said:
Lenoir changed his mind and is now returning, so the Oregon secondary isn't in too bad of shape. Lenoir and Mykael Wright will be in the running for the top corner duo in the conference. Losing Holland and Breeze will drop the Ducks from having arguably the top group of safeties in the conference to just being average.AtomicDawg said:
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
-
Verone McKinley, Nick Pickett, Steve Stephens, Jordan Happle and Bennett Williams have already played a lot of football. Even Jamal Hill has played. Secondary isn't a big concern.dirtysouwfdawg said:
Quook. They suck until they don’t.lawsandl said:
Oregon added Jordan Happle from Boise State whom Avalos likes a lot. Also, Steve Stephen made some big strides in the offseason. Bennett Williams has already proven he can play at a high level. The group won’t be as good but they aren’t falling back to average. Verone McKinley’s jump from freshman to sophomore year could make the group good.CarlosDanger said:
Lenoir changed his mind and is now returning, so the Oregon secondary isn't in too bad of shape. Lenoir and Mykael Wright will be in the running for the top corner duo in the conference. Losing Holland and Breeze will drop the Ducks from having arguably the top group of safeties in the conference to just being average.AtomicDawg said:
4/5 of their secondary is gone now too. I liked their defense a lot. Not i don’t know about the defense as much and hate their offense. Nobody in the conference screams favorite though. And Oregon actually cares, meaning they try to win. So there is that.CarlosDanger said:
Yeah, high potential for them to underachieve for those reasons. The Ducks do look solid at all other positions though, plus they are perceived to have the best coaching staff in the conference, so that could explain the mediots ignoring some glaring flaws/question marks.EastCoastDoog said:But can someone explain to me the Oregon hype? Aren’t they replacing a first round QB and an entire OL? Isn’t that the shit that the football nerds usually care about when they look teams pre-season?
The biggest concern far and away is the OL.
