Should the Dawgs be considered a Pac-12 frontrunner?


Comments
-
Yes.
7-0 or GTFO. -
Depends when and where they play the Buffs.
-
-
The only team objectively to challenge is Oregon and all their pay to play players decided to LEAVE and do it legitimately.
We will be the most talented team on the field rather easily, can Jimmy coach? -
-
I remember my phase when i thought we were going to run the table
-
We? don't even have a competent quarterback.
-
not with new coach, new quarterback, and lack of depth in the secondary again
-
STOpAOG said:not with new coach, new quarterback, and lack of depth in the secondary again
-
UW might. You dont know that.BleachedAnusDawg said:We? don't even have a proven quarterback.
Am I hopeful? Not really. -
Says the man with 15 posts to his nameAOG said: -
Sirously!I take umbrage sir!Like Mohun Biswas.DerekJohnson said: -
I really don't ever see much difference between uw and cal
-
Well you should. There's a vast culture gap.Pitchfork51 said:I really don't ever see much difference between uw and cal
-
Social justice warriors vs social justice warriors?GreenRiverGatorz said:
Well you should. There's a vast culture gap.Pitchfork51 said:I really don't ever see much difference between uw and cal
-
Ok DAWGS, honestly we know what the country thinks of the Pac 12 but curious what our own objective opinion is of UW football within the ranks of national elite programs. We have a great History and tradition.
Not winning a NY^ bowl game i the last few years has hurt us for sure.
My purple glasses removed opinion is we are in the realm of programs like ( Penn State, Michigan, Texas, Florida, auburn.... ) yes even oregon
but not yet where( Clemson, Bama, Oklahoma, Ohio st , LSU and Georgia are)
thoughts? -
UW is a top 20 program through and through. Every team you stated besides Oregon is top 10 maybe 12.Pitchfork51 said:Ok DAWGS, honestly we know what the country thinks of the Pac 12 but curious what our own objective opinion is of UW football within the ranks of national elite programs. We have a great History and tradition.
Not winning a NY^ bowl game i the last few years has hurt us for sure.
My purple glasses removed opinion is we are in the realm of programs like ( Penn State, Michigan, Texas, Florida, auburn.... ) yes even oregon
but not yet where( Clemson, Bama, Oklahoma, Ohio st , LSU and Georgia are)
thoughts? -
HmmmmmAOG said:
Sirously!I take umbrage sir!Like Mohun Biswas.DerekJohnson said: -
-
Mohun Biswas - lol
-
-
I’m not great at algebra, but I think you can reduce the equation between Pete & Whitt.RaceBannon said: -
GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’m not great at algebra, but I think you can reduce the equation between Pete & Whitt.RaceBannon said:
-
Meh, this is just a list of teams that have been consistently good but not great over the last four years.RaceBannon said:
CP's problem was not winning the big games not losing the games he should have won. -
GrundleStiltzkin said:
I’m not great at algebra, but I think you can reduce the equation between Pete & Whitt.RaceBannon said:
-
2 were CalFremontTroll said:
Meh, this is just a list of teams that have been consistently good but not great over the last four years.RaceBannon said:
CP's problem was not winning the big games not losing the games he should have won.
Then in 19 the bottom fell out and lost the big and little ones
@RuffaloSoldier -
Superior Culture will always be your? Achilles heelRaceBannon said:
2 were CalFremontTroll said:
Meh, this is just a list of teams that have been consistently good but not great over the last four years.RaceBannon said:
CP's problem was not winning the big games not losing the games he should have won.
Then in 19 the bottom fell out and lost the big and little ones
@RuffaloSoldier -
Just my opinion but I think Not a national power at this point... strictly regional power for now...the obvious stuff is no out of conference wins against anyone of note, played from behind against most except auburn and seriously did not have the depth to compete over the last several years against top teams. also Did not have the offensive line, and the scheme created additional problems vs the blitz which we never punished anyone for employing. have also had below average QB play for the last decade in big games. Way below average wr play the last 2 years.Pitchfork51 said:Ok DAWGS, honestly we know what the country thinks of the Pac 12 but curious what our own objective opinion is of UW football within the ranks of national elite programs. We have a great History and tradition.
Not winning a NY^ bowl game i the last few years has hurt us for sure.
My purple glasses removed opinion is we are in the realm of programs like ( Penn State, Michigan, Texas, Florida, auburn.... ) yes even oregon
but not yet where( Clemson, Bama, Oklahoma, Ohio st , LSU and Georgia are)
thoughts?
Do think we have the best young OL, WR and DL group now that we have had since 2000, and that could translate into national power status for the first time in a long time. coach k is a gem and the defensive backfield remains a plus.