Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

highlight of 2012 season (not the lawnmower dance)

13»

Comments

  • TMacDawg
    TMacDawg Member Posts: 161
    Jim "Imminent Implosion" Mora stopped soft, jackass behavior (e.g. the UCLA tradition of practice-ditching) the day he started at UCLA.

    Four years into Sark's regime, he still doesn't get it.

    Having fun is what you do after you win a Rose Bowl and/or national championship and pop off.

    Sark is what he is. What he should be is door.ass.out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited July 2013
    TMacDawg said:


    Having fun is what you do after you win a Rose Bowl and/or national championship and pop off. are Gameday champions.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    MikeDamone said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    jecornel said:



    Maybe he likes being 7 win Steve. If he were to win 9-10 games the expectations would be even greater. Keep it to 7-8 wins collect about 3 million a year, keep the stadium 90% filled and you are cruising.

    That is where Rick fucked up. He won a Rose Bowl year two so in year four when he went 7-6 it appeared to be a disaster and fans wanted him out.

    While had he just shown incremental progress every year he'd probably still be coaching today.
    Had Sark won 9 games last year, it would have bought him, bare minimum at least another two years and a total pass this season.
    For all intensive purposes, he did win 9 games last year.
    Damone is right we basically won 9 games last year. I don't know why these negative fans on here can't see the incremental progress that is being displayed on a yearly basis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    jecornel said:



    Maybe he likes being 7 win Steve. If he were to win 9-10 games the expectations would be even greater. Keep it to 7-8 wins collect about 3 million a year, keep the stadium 90% filled and you are cruising.

    That is where Rick fucked up. He won a Rose Bowl year two so in year four when he went 7-6 it appeared to be a disaster and fans wanted him out.

    While had he just shown incremental progress every year he'd probably still be coaching today.
    Had Sark won 9 games last year, it would have bought him, bare minimum at least another two years and a total pass this season.
    For all intensive purposes, he did win 9 games last year.
    Damone is right we basically won 9 games last year. I don't know why these negative fans on here can't see the incremental progress that is being displayed on a yearly basis.
    At the 2012 recruiting banquet Sark said we should have been 9-4. Was last years 9-4 > than 2011 9-4?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    MikeDamone said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    jecornel said:



    Maybe he likes being 7 win Steve. If he were to win 9-10 games the expectations would be even greater. Keep it to 7-8 wins collect about 3 million a year, keep the stadium 90% filled and you are cruising.

    That is where Rick fucked up. He won a Rose Bowl year two so in year four when he went 7-6 it appeared to be a disaster and fans wanted him out.

    While had he just shown incremental progress every year he'd probably still be coaching today.
    Had Sark won 9 games last year, it would have bought him, bare minimum at least another two years and a total pass this season.
    For all intensive purposes, he did win 9 games last year.
    Damone is right we basically won 9 games last year. I don't know why these negative fans on here can't see the incremental progress that is being displayed on a yearly basis.
    At the 2012 recruiting banquet Sark said we should have been 9-4. Was last years 9-4 > than 2011 9-4?
    2011 was never a mythical 9-4. 2011 was simply a better 7-6 than 2010 7-6. While last year was a 7-6 that was really a 9-4 > 2011 7-6 > 2010 7-6. #firepoolboy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    Also people don't realize how close we were to being elite LAST year.

    If Marvin Hall doesn't botch that punt it totally changes the landscape of the game and it would have probably gone down to a final possession.

    If that IDIOT Keith Price didn't throw 2 picks against USC that is an easy win for us, sums up the season for the player who single handedly ruined what could have been special.

    No way we would have lost at WSU if it wasn't for that moron Coons missing that field goal. Oh and also once again Keith Price fumbling in OT where we would have also won if it wasn't for that moment.

    So we easily could have gone 10-2 and probably would have been on our way to a BCS game if it wasn't for a watered down QB, a couple mental lapses, and a terrible kicker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    Nothing beat an "almost" season. Makes you feel warm and fuzzy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter