Interesting how this is getting no coverage

SFGbob said:

Kenosha Police Associatattorney Brendan P. Matthews and the union representing the involved officers released a lengthy statement aiming to correct the record about facts related to the Jacob Blake shooting.

"The recent officer-involved shooting in Kenosha has produced a variety of feelings and narratives; most of which are wholly inaccurate," the release said. "The purely fictional depiction of events coming from those without direct knowledge of what actually occurred is incredibly harmful and provides no benefit to anyone whatsoever, other than to perpetuate a misleading narrative.The lawyers for Mr. Blake, among others, have continued to provide false and misleading 'facts' to the public, in what can only be considered a ploy for attention and sympathy."

Matthews goes on to say that even the Wisconsin Department of Justice incident update into the investigation has inaccuracies.

These were Matthews' points:

• The officers were dispatched to the location due to a complaint that Mr. Blake was attempting to steal the caller’s keys/vehicle.
  
• Officers were aware of Mr. Blake’s open warrant for felony sexual assault (3rd degree) before they arrived on scene.
  
• Mr. Blake was not breaking up a fight between two females when officers arrived on scene.
  
• The silver SUV seen in the widely circulated video was not Mr. Blake’s vehicle.
  
• Mr. Blake was not unarmed. He was armed with a knife. The officers did not see the knife initially. The officers first saw him holding the knife while they were on the passenger side of the vehicle. The “main” video circulating on the internet shows Mr. Blake with the knife in his left hand when he rounds the front of the car. The officers issued repeated commands for Mr. Blake to drop the knife. He did not comply.
  
• The officers initially tried to speak with Mr. Blake, but he was uncooperative.
  
• The officers then began issuing verbal commands to Mr. Blake, but he was non-complaint.
  
• The officers next went “hands-on” with Mr. Blake, so as to gain compliance and control.
  
• Mr. Blake actively resisted the officers’ attempt to gain compliance.
  
• The officers then disengaged and drew their tasers, issuing commands to Mr. Blake that he would be tased if he did not comply.
  
• Based on his non-compliance, one officer tased Mr. Blake. The taser did not incapacitate Mr. Blake.
  
• The officers once more went “hands-on” with Mr. Blake; again, trying to gain control of the escalating situation.
  
• Mr. Blake forcefully fought with the officers, including putting one of the officers in a headlock.
  
• A second taser (from a different officer than had deployed the initial taser) was then deployed on Mr. Blake. It did not appear to have any impact on him.
  
• Based on the inability to gain compliance and control after using verbal, physical and less-lethal means, the officers drew their firearms.
  
• Mr. Blake continued to ignore the officers’ commands, even with the threat of lethal force now present.
  

PurpleThrobber said:

Lebron thinks Jacob Blake was hunted by a cop looking to kill the moment he woke up that day.

So it must be true.

georgiaduck said:

I called a liberal friend of mine to get her opinion on the Blake situation. She was unaware of the knife and unaware of Blake being tased twice. Even after I provided the info she still insisted there was more the cops could have done. No examples- just told me the police shouldn't have taken justice into their own hands. They are so far entrenched in their beliefs there is not point in speaking logically.

WestlinnDuck said:

georgiaduck said:

I called a liberal friend of mine to get her opinion on the Blake situation. She was unaware of the knife and unaware of Blake being tased twice. Even after I provided the info she still insisted there was more the cops could have done. No examples- just told me the police shouldn't have taken justice into their own hands. They are so far entrenched in their beliefs there is not point in speaking logically.

Leftardism is a mental disease. There is no way you can have an honest discussion with one. They are solely invested in their feelings and their herd-like need to virtue signal to each other. They are either proudly ignorant of the actual facts or they proudly ignore the actual facts and then try to persuade you with the strength of their feelings. You can ask them the most basic questions regarding their positions and they will either ignore the question or lie. Ask a leftard who supports AA to define black for AA purposes. I've had that question out there on boards like this for two decades and I haven't gotten one honest response.

SFGbob said:

GrundleStiltzkin said:

I’m not ready to take a police union statement as truth. It is however another input.

But you accepted his Ben Crump, a known fucking liar's statement about him breaking up a fight, being unarmed, not fighting with the cops, just wanting to check on his kids.