Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Final Senate IC report

135

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,018 Founders Club
    The lineup of anti Trump witnesses over the years may be the least impressive in history
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    SFGbob said:

    From the documents produced by Cohen, the Committee became concerned that
    multiple witnesses and/or their counsel could have been involved in or aware of Cohen's attempt
    to mislead the Committee. Indeed, at least two witnesses (Donald Trump Jr. and Felix Sater)
    could have known that Cohen's statement falsely represented material facts about negotiations
    over a. deal for a Trump Tower Moscow.

    The crack legal mind of the Dazzler has him this time.

    A notably flurry of activity
    immediately preceded Cohen's submission of his August written statement, and an additional
    burst of communications surrounded his October 25, 2017 testimony.     Based on the names of
    counsel identified in the log, membership in the alleged JDA appeared to include, at least,
    Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr.; the Trump Organization, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Paul
    Manafort, the Trump Campaign, Keith Schiller, Hope Hicks, Michael Flynn, and Felix Sater.
    However, the Committee was provided with no competent evidence to substantiate the JDA's ·
    existence by Ryan or anyone else.

    (U) Due to time and resource considerations, the Committee opted not to further pursue
    its inquiry into potentially obstructive conduct under this alleged JDA umbrella. Doing so would
    have likely required initiating litigation over subpoena compliance, a process that may not have
    resolved in time to be of investigative value.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    RaceBannon said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Damning
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    SFGbob said:

    RaceBannon said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Damning
    When you allege a non-existent joint defense agreement in stone walling an investigation, even Republican Senators take note of the volume of material you are trying to conceal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NorthwestFresh
    NorthwestFresh Member Posts: 7,972
    edited August 2020
    RaceBannon said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.” FFS the FBI raided Cohen’s office and home, so much for attorney-client privilege, seized all documents and electronics, and STILL found nothing on Trump they could use which means the “flurry of activity” didn’t implicate anyone else, and especially Trump.. Then they squeezed Cohen, who had nothing to offer against Trump, so they indict him for tax evasion and campaign finance for the Stormy payoff, none leading to Trump, and locked him up with a guilty plea.

    Biden’s America.

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus. My opinion of you is actually somewhat lower after this thread. You’re in a trio with those other two morons.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    RaceBannon said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Privilege log.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,521
    NorthwestFresh said:

    RaceBannon said:

    A notable flurry of activity?

    Which “may not be resolved.”

    I expect this nonsensical bullshit from @insinceredawg or @MontlakeBridgeTroll, yet Lionel has managed to out-dipshit them both in this thread. Great job, goofus.

    Can someone remind Boris that I'm quoting the report from a committee his party controls?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter