Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

another objective metric confirming Sark's ineptitude

sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

May 2014 edited May 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board

Yeah, yeah, BR, but, it's the SPARQ data, an independent metric of overall strength and athleticism of players, sorted by position for the recent NFL draft, that matters.

http://www.fieldgulls.com/nfl-draft/2014/3/31/5566802/nfl-draft-2013-sparq-profiling-part-1-offensive-line

-1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

• 

  Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623

  May 2014

  TL;DR - what poont are you trying to make?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

  May 2014

  My metric proving he was bad is 34-29, 24-21

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425

  May 2014

  How about 8-29?

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,408

  May 2014

  He_Needs_More_Time said:

  My metric proving he was bad is 34-29, 24-21

  This, 7-6, and 5-4 work just fine. No need for anyone to press any further.

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter