Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Options

another objective metric confirming Sark's ineptitude

sarktastic

sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

5 Awesomes

Photogenic

First Anniversary

Name Dropper

May 2014 edited May 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board

Yeah, yeah, BR, but, it's the SPARQ data, an independent metric of overall strength and athleticism of players, sorted by position for the recent NFL draft, that matters.

http://www.fieldgulls.com/nfl-draft/2014/3/31/5566802/nfl-draft-2013-sparq-profiling-part-1-offensive-line

-1 ·

Comments

Options
Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623

May 2014

TL;DR - what poont are you trying to make?

0 · Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Options
[Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

May 2014

My metric proving he was bad is 34-29, 24-21

4 · Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Options
Gladstone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,417

May 2014

How about 8-29?

0 · Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Options
RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123

May 2014

He_Needs_More_Time said:
My metric proving he was bad is 34-29, 24-21
This, 7-6, and 5-4 work just fine. No need for anyone to press any further.

3 · Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

or Register to comment.

Powered by Vanilla