Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jabez Tinae, 2021 4* WR, Burien (Kennedy Catholic), WA (Committed)

145679

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,920 Founders Club

    He made plenty on changes during his tenure and just because we underachieved last year doesn’t take away how he built this program up. But your entitled to your opinion.
    We underachieved all 6 years from one to six
  • Beno4LifeBeno4Life Member Posts: 533

    He made plenty on changes during his tenure and just because we underachieved last year doesn’t take away how he built this program up. But your entitled to your opinion.
    I don't think Emoterman is saying Pete didn't work his ass off, trying to win and cultivate a culture of excellence for the dudes on and off the field.

    But don't you think the team mirrored Petersen's rigidity and "wound-up-ness" and played tight against Stanford and Colorado especially? How do you explain playing like alphas against USC and BYU and the Cuog (and Whoregon for three quarters) and then looking like you don't even want to compete against Stanford and Colorado?
  • UDubHusky23UDubHusky23 Member Posts: 889
    edited July 2020

    I definitely think we lacked leadership from upperclassmen but I also think we sucked on offense and took a step back on defense. When coming up with reasons as far as why we sucked last year it would be

    1. Playing underachieving seniors over young talent
    2. Our OC play calling and offensive scheme
    3. Culture
    Not to nit-pick but 1 seem part of 3. Besides when Pete first started out and played the freshmen, I think he preferred trusting upperclassmen to a fault.

    But our senior leadership sucked ass last year. I really missed the Kevin Kings and Darrell Daniels types.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,920 Founders Club

    Pete refused to adapt his shitty offensive system. End of discussion

    And his players followed his lead on quitting
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,004 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2020

    He made plenty on changes during his tenure and just because we underachieved last year doesn’t take away how he built this program up. But your entitled to your opinion.
    Disagree if you look at 2014 and 2015 seasons. He built the program up better than Sark which isn't very impressive. Giving Bynun, Puka, and Spiker spot reps after the season is over is not really changing anything.

    Also disagree that the defense took a step back. Considering that we have graduated the whole defense ~2-3 times during the Pete tenure and had it dominating by the end of the season this year I still don't get why people focus on that or one position coach instead of an entire side of the ball that lost us all 5 games.

    In 2020 your offense has to spot your defense at times. Like every fucking blue blood with a better defense than us has had to do it even.

    It's funny how much we're supposed to appreciate Petersen but I guarantee if you get Shaw and even Meat to be honest about it they would claim they could achieve a lot more at UW. They had Pete and his numerous flaws dialed in and don't have the loser 'it's hard you can't expect us to score 17+ points in Tempe' mentality.
  • DawgDaze71DawgDaze71 Member Posts: 708
    Baseman said:

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,920 Founders Club
    Baseman said:

    "we want Bama. we're going to beat Bama." - Race Bannon just prior to the 2017 Peach Bowel
    And?
  • mrdoogmrdoog Member Posts: 203
    When is Eklund going to change his CB to a hard BBC 10 incher
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    chuck said:



    This thread has a deceptive title and I forgot, again, not to click on it.

    I dont see why it's so hard to acknowledge Petersen's failings and downsides along with his accomplishments without denying one or the other or acting like one erased the other. I guess that position is too nuanced for this board or maybe it's just these tims.
    So you expect us to act like level headed adults?
  • EmotermanEmoterman Member Posts: 3,333
    Coach Pete agrees with me he isn't the right man for the UW head football coach job beyond the 2019 season. QED we are better with almost ANYONE else as our coach this season.

    Whether or not Lake is the guy remains to be seen, and as an avowed loather of John Don and denizen of this smoothly-swiveling-teen-boi-hips message bored, I'd say the signs are... not good. But, still, Bertrand Russell, Coach Pete, and I agree that Jim Lake(bright) is a better man for the job than Coach Pete.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,545 Swaye's Wigwam
    FireCohen said:

    So you expect us to act like level headed adults?
    Here I am again. Jesus.

    No, I expect nothing, especially not level headedness. I cant even decide if i want that.
  • HuskyPatrolHuskyPatrol Member Posts: 7
    Found this scouting report about him, not the fastest guy but good all around.

    https://cfbsaturdays.com/jabez-tinae-scouting-report/
Sign In or Register to comment.