top 25 according to espnfs
No huskies, so a team that went 9-4, vastly upgraded at coach, and are returning almost everyone on both lines isn't top 25. Now let's name off some of the coaches that are included and their records last year.
Bo Pelini 9-4 (5-3)
Kirk Ferentz 8-5 (5-3)
Brady Hoke 7-6 (3-5)
All of those were in the big ten which is a total dreckfest, worse than the pac-12
Will Muschamp 4-8 (3-6)
Larry Fedora 7-6 (4-4)
Kliff Kingsbury 8-5 (4-5)
Steve Sarkisian 8-4 (5-4)
I know. ESPN is fucktarded, water is wet
Comments
-
That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent -
Also surprising that they didn't keep Boise State in the Top 25
-
flagged for purchasing espninsiderTequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent -
1) I have a subscription to the Magazine which gives me free insider access
2) Insider comes in handy during the college football season for betting purposes -
flagged for subscribing to the magazineTequilla said:1) I have a subscription to the Magazine which gives me free insider access
2) Insider comes in handy during the college football season for betting purposes -
Thank you magazine superiority guy
-
What is this bullshit? Watch the final minute of that video here:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10884991/college-football-post-spring-way-too-early-preseason-top-25
Yeah, we have to replace Sankey, but we're returning the entire OL and have a stable of RBs that'll do just fine. "A defense that could not get off the field"? We were 29th in scoring defense at 22.8 points per game (55th in YPG, which isn't terrible) and we return the entire front seven minus Fuiamono. The main question is replacing Price but we've got 2 months to prepare our QBs before Stanford and 3 months before Oregon if it isn't Miles.
But whatever, this isn't the real AP Top 25 and we'll be in it by the second week if we're not to start the season. -
haha. These blow hards just throw cliche statements out there. "Defense that couldn't get off the field."
While they were not dominant, they were above average on defense and points allowed shows that. I like the fact that they are being overlooked though. I think Petersen will have those boys ready to rumble. Every player to a man has talked about the difference between Sark and Petersen. -
LolTequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 5-4
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent
-
Who cares if we're not in the Top 25 or not ... let our play on the field do the talking.
