Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
top 25 according to espnfs
dhdawg
Member Posts: 13,326
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10884991/college-football-post-spring-way-too-early-preseason-top-25
No huskies, so a team that went 9-4, vastly upgraded at coach, and are returning almost everyone on both lines isn't top 25. Now let's name off some of the coaches that are included and their records last year.
Bo Pelini 9-4 (5-3)
Kirk Ferentz 8-5 (5-3)
Brady Hoke 7-6 (3-5)
All of those were in the big ten which is a total dreckfest, worse than the pac-12
Will Muschamp 4-8 (3-6)
Larry Fedora 7-6 (4-4)
Kliff Kingsbury 8-5 (4-5)
Steve Sarkisian 8-4 (5-4)
I know. ESPN is fucktarded, water is wet
No huskies, so a team that went 9-4, vastly upgraded at coach, and are returning almost everyone on both lines isn't top 25. Now let's name off some of the coaches that are included and their records last year.
Bo Pelini 9-4 (5-3)
Kirk Ferentz 8-5 (5-3)
Brady Hoke 7-6 (3-5)
All of those were in the big ten which is a total dreckfest, worse than the pac-12
Will Muschamp 4-8 (3-6)
Larry Fedora 7-6 (4-4)
Kliff Kingsbury 8-5 (4-5)
Steve Sarkisian 8-4 (5-4)
I know. ESPN is fucktarded, water is wet
Comments
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent
2) Insider comes in handy during the college football season for betting purposes
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10884991/college-football-post-spring-way-too-early-preseason-top-25
Yeah, we have to replace Sankey, but we're returning the entire OL and have a stable of RBs that'll do just fine. "A defense that could not get off the field"? We were 29th in scoring defense at 22.8 points per game (55th in YPG, which isn't terrible) and we return the entire front seven minus Fuiamono. The main question is replacing Price but we've got 2 months to prepare our QBs before Stanford and 3 months before Oregon if it isn't Miles.
But whatever, this isn't the real AP Top 25 and we'll be in it by the second week if we're not to start the season.
While they were not dominant, they were above average on defense and points allowed shows that. I like the fact that they are being overlooked though. I think Petersen will have those boys ready to rumble. Every player to a man has talked about the difference between Sark and Petersen.
They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year.
Fetters, put your shoes back on! Smells like a Chinese laundromat.
Sorry everyone, got sidetracked....blonde. Offseason natty in 2017 hang on
Anybody that answers yes to any of the following: 1) is obsessed with NFL Mock Drafting such that they have to see updates twice a week to see who people think that their team MIGHT draft and 2) pays any attention to what Mel Kiper's hair gel thinks needs to jump off of a high dive into a swimming pool full of gasoline and then without drying off, light a fire to start the BBQ ribs that they were planning on having for dinner.
ESPN isn't the only site that is fucking stupid when it comes to way too early Top 25 lists.
All that being said, @OZONE is fucking stupid.
That being said, we also haven't had a grown up head coach in a decade either while Oregon arguably has its worst coach in a decade.