top 25 according to espnfs
No huskies, so a team that went 9-4, vastly upgraded at coach, and are returning almost everyone on both lines isn't top 25. Now let's name off some of the coaches that are included and their records last year.
Bo Pelini 9-4 (5-3)
Kirk Ferentz 8-5 (5-3)
Brady Hoke 7-6 (3-5)
All of those were in the big ten which is a total dreckfest, worse than the pac-12
Will Muschamp 4-8 (3-6)
Larry Fedora 7-6 (4-4)
Kliff Kingsbury 8-5 (4-5)
Steve Sarkisian 8-4 (5-4)
I know. ESPN is fucktarded, water is wet
Comments
-
That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent -
Also surprising that they didn't keep Boise State in the Top 25
-
flagged for purchasing espninsiderTequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent -
1) I have a subscription to the Magazine which gives me free insider access
2) Insider comes in handy during the college football season for betting purposes -
flagged for subscribing to the magazineTequilla said:1) I have a subscription to the Magazine which gives me free insider access
2) Insider comes in handy during the college football season for betting purposes -
Thank you magazine superiority guy
-
What is this bullshit? Watch the final minute of that video here:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10884991/college-football-post-spring-way-too-early-preseason-top-25
Yeah, we have to replace Sankey, but we're returning the entire OL and have a stable of RBs that'll do just fine. "A defense that could not get off the field"? We were 29th in scoring defense at 22.8 points per game (55th in YPG, which isn't terrible) and we return the entire front seven minus Fuiamono. The main question is replacing Price but we've got 2 months to prepare our QBs before Stanford and 3 months before Oregon if it isn't Miles.
But whatever, this isn't the real AP Top 25 and we'll be in it by the second week if we're not to start the season. -
haha. These blow hards just throw cliche statements out there. "Defense that couldn't get off the field."
While they were not dominant, they were above average on defense and points allowed shows that. I like the fact that they are being overlooked though. I think Petersen will have those boys ready to rumble. Every player to a man has talked about the difference between Sark and Petersen. -
LolTequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 5-4
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent
-
Who cares if we're not in the Top 25 or not ... let our play on the field do the talking.
-
I like being ESPNFS and say UW will go 8-4 in the regular season when it's literally impossible to do that.Tequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent
They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year. -
Peterman just needs more time to start competing for the offseason natty. Not enough OKGs yet. Too many edgy players. Should be a wild ride.
Fetters, put your shoes back on! Smells like a Chinese laundromat.
Sorry everyone, got sidetracked....blonde. Offseason natty in 2017 hang on
-
you get what you deserve for buying espninsider. I really need to buy that shit so I can read more about why Mel Kiper thinks the seahawks drafted poorly. I mean Bobby Wagner, Russell Wilson, Malcolm Smith. TerribleHe_Needs_More_Time said:
I like being ESPNFS and say UW will go 8-4 in the regular season when it's literally impossible to do that.Tequilla said:That's not as fucktarded as this gem from ESPN:
http://insider.espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/10872090/projecting-2014-pac-12-team-records-division-rankings-college-football?ex_cid=espnapi_public
3. Washington Huskies
Projected finish: 8-4 (5-4)
Chance to win Pac-12: 2 percent
Chance to finish 11-1 or 12-0: 2 percent
They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year. -
There's some decent views from people on Insider and some good stat geek information that you can't get elsewhere ...
Anybody that answers yes to any of the following: 1) is obsessed with NFL Mock Drafting such that they have to see updates twice a week to see who people think that their team MIGHT draft and 2) pays any attention to what Mel Kiper's hair gel thinks needs to jump off of a high dive into a swimming pool full of gasoline and then without drying off, light a fire to start the BBQ ribs that they were planning on having for dinner. -
Who. Cares.
-
Lots a dooging it up in this thread.
-
Obligatory fix.MikeDamone said:Lots a dooging it up on this board.
-
cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/24552506/post-spring-top-25-welcome-back-to-the-top-spot-alabama
ESPN isn't the only site that is fucking stupid when it comes to way too early Top 25 lists. -
They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year.
To be fair, you fellows have to admit that we should be favored this year (Mariota, Tyner, Ifo, at home, etc). Depending on how well Peterman does this year I think there's a good chance that the Huskies are favored going into next year's game at new-renovated-spiffy-awesome-Huskieie Stadium.
All that being said, @OZONE is fucking stupid. -
The Ducks honestly should be favored every year until we beat them ... we haven't proven that we can stay within 2 scores of them in over a decade.
That being said, we also haven't had a grown up head coach in a decade either while Oregon arguably has its worst coach in a decade. -
To be fair, you fellows have to admit that we should be favored this year (Mariota, Tyner, Ifo, at home, etc). Depending on how well Peterman does this year I think there's a good chance that the Huskies are favored going into next year's game at new-renovated-spiffy-awesome-Huskieie Stadium.AZDuck said:They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year.
All that being said, @OZONE is fucking stupid.Whoooooooooosh -
To be fair, you fellows have to admit that we should be favored this year (Mariota, Tyner, Ifo, at home, etc). Depending on how well Peterman does this year I think there's a good chance that the Huskies are favored going into next year's game at new-renovated-spiffy-awesome-Huskieie Stadium.AZDuck said:They have reached OZONEFS territory when he says Oregon will win their 12th in a row against UW this year.
All that being said, @OZONE is fucking stupid.
So? You can kill us by 100 points you won't beat UW for the 12th year in a row this year. -
So? You can kill us by 100 points you won't beat UW for the 12th year in a row this year.
LOL, attentiontodetailfail -
I like to be CBSSports FS and leave out UW but rank a BYU team that UW plungered at the end of last year with an interim coach.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:cbssports.com/collegefootball/writer/dennis-dodd/24552506/post-spring-top-25-welcome-back-to-the-top-spot-alabama
ESPN isn't the only site that is fucking stupid when it comes to way too early Top 25 lists.
I do that
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
