Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Play the P12-post-spring-power-ranking game.

TTJ
TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
in Hardcore Husky Board
You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado















12. Cal
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    TTJ said:

    You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

    Here's mine:
    1. UCLA
    2. Oregon
    3. Washington
    4. ASU
    5. Stanford
    6. USC
    7. Arizona
    8. Utah
    9. WSU
    10. Oregon State
    11. Colorado















    12. Cal is still too high

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    TTJ said:

    You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

    Here's mine:
    1. UCLA
    2. Oregon
    3. Washington
    4. ASU
    5. Stanford
    6. USC
    7. Arizona
    8. Utah
    9. WSU
    10. Oregon State
    11. Colorado















    12. Cal

    Pretty sure the REAL rankings would have a six-way tie for third place and somehow have UW ahead of Oregon.

    RIP This team does not suck
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,840
    CuntWaffle said:

    You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.

    Nah. More obsessed with beating Sven to his favorite non Citrus annoyance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,535 Founders Club
    Cal is still ranked too high.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    1. UCLA
    2. Oregon
    3. Washington
    4. Stanford
    5. Arizona
    6. USC
    7. ASU
    8. WSU
    9. Oregon State
    10. Utah
    11. Colorado
    12. Cal

    That middle sure is a mess.

    Arizona doesn't have QB, but I think they'll be fine if BJ Denker could lead them to 8 wins last year. ASU lost a lot on defense, so they're a step behind where they were last year. USC will have the talent but will disappoint, and I'm pegging them for 3rd in the south.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    1. Washington























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    allpurpleallgold said:

    1. Washington























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    This
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    flagged for bleacher report
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,161 Founders Club
    allpurpleallgold said:

    1. Washington
























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    This thread really fucking sucks on an iPhone
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:

    North:

    1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
    2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
    3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
    4) Washington St
    5) Oregon St
    6) Cal

    South:

    1) UCLA
    2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the 6-3 that goes with it
    3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
    5) Utah
    6) Colorado
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    allpurpleallgold said:

    1. Washington























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































    cal is still too high
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:

    North:

    1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
    2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
    3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
    4) Washington St
    5) Oregon St
    6) Cal

    South:

    1) UCLA
    2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the 6-3 5-4 that goes with it
    3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
    5) Utah
    6) Colorado

    Obvious fix is obvious.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Tequilla said:

    I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.

    He's gone 5-4 with beating Cal, Utah and Colorado. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Care to share your fucktarded rankings?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,147
    edited May 2014
    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Having all of the OL, DL, and the LB's returning matters. Games are won up front. We have had good skill guys for awhile. Next year will be no different. Most importantly, we have a real coach. Stanford and ASU lost a lot off last years teams, and we have those games at home.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Top 13 advanced metrics team returns 17/22 starters with a huge upgrade at head coach.

    And before you criticize the metrics, they had Oregon #2 last season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.

    UCLA won 10 games, finished the year ranked 16. Returns practically everyone. They return more starters than any team in conference and return a QB who is expected to be a first round pick.

    Mora is a good coach, third year as a head coach which is usually the year the good head coaches make their mark. They also host Stanford, Oregon and USC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Care to share your fucktarded rankings?
    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    OZONE said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Care to share your fucktarded rankings?
    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.
    You really belong on eDuck. Your constant IMALOSER territory of Quooking it up is beyond sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    OZONE said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    OZONE said:

    ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

    Care to share your fucktarded rankings?
    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.
    You really belong on eDuck. Your constant IMALOSER territory of Quooking it up is beyond sad.
    12 in a row this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 12,991
    OZONE said:

    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.

    The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.

    QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.

    UCLA won 10 games, finished the year ranked 16. Returns practically everyone. They return more starters than any team in conference and return a QB who is expected to be a first round pick.

    Mora is a good coach, third year as a head coach which is usually the year the good head coaches make their mark. They also host Stanford, Oregon and USC.
    You make a decent case for it with the exception of the QB. He's the same guy who some Stanfurd poster made the following comment about: "Hundley's ability to stare down a receiver is unrivaled. Throws a pick." He isn't all that impressive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    OZONE said:

    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.

    The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.

    QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
    This. UW has 3 QBs all better than Vanilla Vick.

    And five studs at RB. I was a lot more concerned about who would replace Polk than I am about who will replace Sankey.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,147
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.

    UCLA should be good, but . They have a bunch of starters returning, and have recruited well, but we'll see. The OL should be better, but they lost their best guy from it to the NFL. It was a dreckfest last year. I'm not sure how good it can get in a year. Maybe it's still another year away? It will be comprised of mainly sophomores and true juniors. Hundley regressed a little last year, mostly because of the OL, but as we saw with Price, getting hit a lot can cause bad habits. Their defense was not great last year. It lost three of the top 5 guys on defense too (Barr, Zumwalt, Marsh). They have recruited well to replace them, but their defense will need to take a step to be a legit title contender.

    I think they win the South because they will have the luxury of losing two games. I like UCLA, but they could end up being overrated. Are they a top 10 team, or are they still a 15-25 team? It should be an exciting season, because a lot can happen. Was Oregon's late season slide a bad sign of things to come? Can UW and UCLA take the next step? Can Stanford replace Murphy, Skov, and the OL? Will anyone surprise and be somewhat of a threat (Arizona, USC, WSU)?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    TTJ said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    OZONE said:

    Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.

    hth.

    The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.

    QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
    This. UW has 3 QBs all better than Vanilla Vick.

    And five studs at RB. I was a lot more concerned about who would replace Polk than I am about who will replace Sankey.
    I might have ranked you as high as 5 if you had landed Mora as HC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    RoadDawg55 said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.

    UCLA should be good, but . They have a bunch of starters returning, and have recruited well, but we'll see. The OL should be better, but they lost their best guy from it to the NFL. It was a dreckfest last year. I'm not sure how good it can get in a year. Maybe it's still another year away? It will be comprised of mainly sophomores and true juniors. Hundley regressed a little last year, mostly because of the OL, but as we saw with Price, getting hit a lot can cause bad habits. Their defense was not great last year. It lost three of the top 5 guys on defense too (Barr, Zumwalt, Marsh). They have recruited well to replace them, but their defense will need to take a step to be a legit title contender.

    I think they win the South because they will have the luxury of losing two games. I like UCLA, but they could end up being overrated. Are they a top 10 team, or are they still a 15-25 team? It should be an exciting season, because a lot can happen. Was Oregon's late season slide a bad sign of things to come? Can UW and UCLA take the next step? Can Stanford replace Murphy, Skov, and the OL? Will anyone surprise and be somewhat of a threat (Arizona, USC, WSU)?
    The most important fact I got from this poast is about Zumwalt. He will be gone? Fuck. That sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter