Play the P12-post-spring-power-ranking game.

TTJ

You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado















12. Cal

dnc

TTJ said:

You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado















12. Cal is still too high

CuntWaffle

You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.

[Deleted User]

TTJ said:

You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.

Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado















12. Cal

Pretty sure the REAL rankings would have a six-way tie for third place and somehow have UW ahead of Oregon.

RIP This team does not suck

dnc

CuntWaffle said:

You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.

Nah. More obsessed with beating Sven to his favorite non Citrus annoyance.

AtomicPiss

Cal is still ranked too high.

whatshouldicareabout

1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. Stanford
5. Arizona
6. USC
7. ASU
8. WSU
9. Oregon State
10. Utah
11. Colorado
12. Cal

That middle sure is a mess.

Arizona doesn't have QB, but I think they'll be fine if BJ Denker could lead them to 8 wins last year. ASU lost a lot on defense, so they're a step behind where they were last year. USC will have the talent but will disappoint, and I'm pegging them for 3rd in the south.

allpurpleallgold

1. Washington

whatshouldicareabout

allpurpleallgold said:

1. Washington

This

AZDuck

flagged for bleacher report

SweatpantsGeneral

allpurpleallgold said:

1. Washington

This thread really fucking sucks on an iPhone

Tequilla

1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:

North:

1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
4) Washington St
5) Oregon St
6) Cal

South:

1) UCLA
2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the 6-3 that goes with it
3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
5) Utah
6) Colorado

dhdawg

allpurpleallgold said:

1. Washington

cal is still too high

[Deleted User]

Tequilla said:

1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:

North:

1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
4) Washington St
5) Oregon St
6) Cal

South:

1) UCLA
2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the 6-3 5-4 that goes with it
3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
5) Utah
6) Colorado

Obvious fix is obvious.

Tequilla

I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.

[Deleted User]

Tequilla said:

I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.

He's gone 5-4 with beating Cal, Utah and Colorado. HTH

OZONE

ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

[Deleted User]

OZONE said:

ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

Care to share your fucktarded rankings?

RoadDawg55

OZONE said:

ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

Having all of the OL, DL, and the LB's returning matters. Games are won up front. We have had good skill guys for awhile. Next year will be no different. Most importantly, we have a real coach. Stanford and ASU lost a lot off last years teams, and we have those games at home.

oregonblitzkrieg

Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.

HeretoBeatmyChest

OZONE said:

ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?

Top 13 advanced metrics team returns 17/22 starters with a huge upgrade at head coach.

And before you criticize the metrics, they had Oregon #2 last season.