Play the P12-post-spring-power-ranking game.
Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado
12. Cal
Comments
-
TTJ said:
You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.
Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado
12. Cal is still too high -
You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.
-
Pretty sure the REAL rankings would have a six-way tie for third place and somehow have UW ahead of Oregon.TTJ said:You can't possibly suck at it worse than these guys.
Here's mine:
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. ASU
5. Stanford
6. USC
7. Arizona
8. Utah
9. WSU
10. Oregon State
11. Colorado
12. Cal
RIP This team does not suck -
Nah. More obsessed with beating Sven to his favorite non Citrus annoyance.CuntWaffle said:You might be more obsessed with Cal than Sven is.
-
Cal is still ranked too high.
-
1. UCLA
2. Oregon
3. Washington
4. Stanford
5. Arizona
6. USC
7. ASU
8. WSU
9. Oregon State
10. Utah
11. Colorado
12. Cal
That middle sure is a mess.
Arizona doesn't have QB, but I think they'll be fine if BJ Denker could lead them to 8 wins last year. ASU lost a lot on defense, so they're a step behind where they were last year. USC will have the talent but will disappoint, and I'm pegging them for 3rd in the south. -
1. Washington
-
Thisallpurpleallgold said:1. Washington
-
flagged for bleacher report
-
This thread really fucking sucks on an iPhoneallpurpleallgold said:1. Washington
-
1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:
North:
1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
4) Washington St
5) Oregon St
6) Cal
South:
1) UCLA
2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the 6-3 that goes with it
3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
5) Utah
6) Colorado -
cal is still too highallpurpleallgold said:1. Washington
-
Obvious fix is obvious.Tequilla said:1-12 doesn't mean shit since you have 2 6 team divisions:
North:
1) Oregon - both Washington and Stanford have to go to Autzen, no USC; have to go to UCLA
2) Washington - can't pick them to beat Oregon @ Oregon until they do; get all other materially difficult conference games at home
3) Stanford - road games against Oregon, Washington, and UCLA; USC at home
4) Washington St
5) Oregon St
6) Cal
South:
1) UCLA
2) USC - 2nd place finishes in the conference are a cool story brah - forget the6-35-4 that goes with it
3/4) Arizona schools - probably finish tied as both have massive question marks
5) Utah
6) Colorado -
I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.
-
He's gone 5-4 with beating Cal, Utah and Colorado. HTHTequilla said:I'm assuming that Sark gets a game bump for being at USC and getting 2 dreckfests to play yearly in Utah and Colorado that he should beat plus the annual plungering of Cal. I fully expect he can go 3-3 for the rest of the conference season year in and year out.
-
ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
-
Care to share your fucktarded rankings?OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
-
Having all of the OL, DL, and the LB's returning matters. Games are won up front. We have had good skill guys for awhile. Next year will be no different. Most importantly, we have a real coach. Stanford and ASU lost a lot off last years teams, and we have those games at home.OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
-
Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
-
Top 13 advanced metrics team returns 17/22 starters with a huge upgrade at head coach.OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
And before you criticize the metrics, they had Oregon #2 last season. -
UCLA won 10 games, finished the year ranked 16. Returns practically everyone. They return more starters than any team in conference and return a QB who is expected to be a first round pick.oregonblitzkrieg said:Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
Mora is a good coach, third year as a head coach which is usually the year the good head coaches make their mark. They also host Stanford, Oregon and USC. -
Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Care to share your fucktarded rankings?OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
hth.
-
You really belong on eDuck. Your constant IMALOSER territory of Quooking it up is beyond sad.OZONE said:
Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Care to share your fucktarded rankings?OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
hth. -
12 in a row this year.He_Needs_More_Time said:
You really belong on eDuck. Your constant IMALOSER territory of Quooking it up is beyond sad.OZONE said:
Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Care to share your fucktarded rankings?OZONE said:ROFL... loads of you are picking UW in the top 3, and yet you claim you aren't all Doogs?
hth.
-
The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.OZONE said:Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.
hth.
QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
-
You make a decent case for it with the exception of the QB. He's the same guy who some Stanfurd poster made the following comment about: "Hundley's ability to stare down a receiver is unrivaled. Throws a pick." He isn't all that impressive.He_Needs_More_Time said:
UCLA won 10 games, finished the year ranked 16. Returns practically everyone. They return more starters than any team in conference and return a QB who is expected to be a first round pick.oregonblitzkrieg said:Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
Mora is a good coach, third year as a head coach which is usually the year the good head coaches make their mark. They also host Stanford, Oregon and USC. -
This. UW has 3 QBs all better than Vanilla Vick.whatshouldicareabout said:
The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.OZONE said:Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.
hth.
QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
And five studs at RB. I was a lot more concerned about who would replace Polk than I am about who will replace Sankey. -
UCLA should be good, but . They have a bunch of starters returning, and have recruited well, but we'll see. The OL should be better, but they lost their best guy from it to the NFL. It was a dreckfest last year. I'm not sure how good it can get in a year. Maybe it's still another year away? It will be comprised of mainly sophomores and true juniors. Hundley regressed a little last year, mostly because of the OL, but as we saw with Price, getting hit a lot can cause bad habits. Their defense was not great last year. It lost three of the top 5 guys on defense too (Barr, Zumwalt, Marsh). They have recruited well to replace them, but their defense will need to take a step to be a legit title contender.oregonblitzkrieg said:Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
I think they win the South because they will have the luxury of losing two games. I like UCLA, but they could end up being overrated. Are they a top 10 team, or are they still a 15-25 team? It should be an exciting season, because a lot can happen. Was Oregon's late season slide a bad sign of things to come? Can UW and UCLA take the next step? Can Stanford replace Murphy, Skov, and the OL? Will anyone surprise and be somewhat of a threat (Arizona, USC, WSU)? -
I might have ranked you as high as 5 if you had landed Mora as HC.TTJ said:
This. UW has 3 QBs all better than Vanilla Vick.whatshouldicareabout said:
The competition for our starting RB is a guy that went for 166 yards on 11 carries vs OSU and a guy that went 141 yards on 11 carries vs OSU.OZONE said:Sure. Almost the same as the linked article, but I'd drop UW below Zona. You have more QB and RB questions than they do.
hth.
QB is a mess until Miles comes back. It's nothing compared to Arizona's QB situation where they won't know until probably midway through the year.
And five studs at RB. I was a lot more concerned about who would replace Polk than I am about who will replace Sankey. -
The most important fact I got from this poast is about Zumwalt. He will be gone? Fuck. That sucks.RoadDawg55 said:
UCLA should be good, but . They have a bunch of starters returning, and have recruited well, but we'll see. The OL should be better, but they lost their best guy from it to the NFL. It was a dreckfest last year. I'm not sure how good it can get in a year. Maybe it's still another year away? It will be comprised of mainly sophomores and true juniors. Hundley regressed a little last year, mostly because of the OL, but as we saw with Price, getting hit a lot can cause bad habits. Their defense was not great last year. It lost three of the top 5 guys on defense too (Barr, Zumwalt, Marsh). They have recruited well to replace them, but their defense will need to take a step to be a legit title contender.oregonblitzkrieg said:Too much love for UCLA in this thread. What did they do of any significance last year that would warrant them being #1? I'll answer that question myself: Nothing much at all. I don't know who should currently sit at #1 but UCLA does not belong there.
I think they win the South because they will have the luxury of losing two games. I like UCLA, but they could end up being overrated. Are they a top 10 team, or are they still a 15-25 team? It should be an exciting season, because a lot can happen. Was Oregon's late season slide a bad sign of things to come? Can UW and UCLA take the next step? Can Stanford replace Murphy, Skov, and the OL? Will anyone surprise and be somewhat of a threat (Arizona, USC, WSU)?
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
