Pre-emptive fuck off to Trump
I have a hard time imagining anything positive coming, based on that.
Comments
-
They did it to themselves.
They kept claiming they were a forum under forum rules then changed to editorial control of content.
PUBLISHER
oops!
They were warned. -
I’m sure Twitter will do fine as an electronic newspaper.
-
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has called out Twitter for attaching a fact check to a tweet from President Trump, telling Fox News' Dana Perino that privately-owned digital platforms should not act as the "arbiter of truth."
I don't see this ending well but it probably will. The hypocrisy by Twitter is staggering against the over reach by Trump which is easily over turned -
Appealing to the base, nothing more, as most EOs generally do when looking at the language. It’ll get gummed up in court as most do.
-
Headfake aimed at the TDS crowd. Special delivery from the Troll in Chief.GrundleStiltzkin said:
A Nothingburger on whole wheat. -
So the President rails against fake news since we've known him, but when he's called out on his own fake news he whines like a baby. Pretty much a nothingburger when it come to this clown.
-
Zuckerberg seems to be casting stones while living in a glass house. Doesn't facebook police content now?RaceBannon said:Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has called out Twitter for attaching a fact check to a tweet from President Trump, telling Fox News' Dana Perino that privately-owned digital platforms should not act as the "arbiter of truth."
I don't see this ending well but it probably will. The hypocrisy by Twitter is staggering against the over reach by Trump which is easily over turned -
I will RTFEO before calling him a bitch but I like my odds that i will be calling him a bitch
-
It's for your own good bigotcreepycoug said:
Zuckerberg seems to be casting stones while living in a glass house. Doesn't facebook police content now?RaceBannon said:Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has called out Twitter for attaching a fact check to a tweet from President Trump, telling Fox News' Dana Perino that privately-owned digital platforms should not act as the "arbiter of truth."
I don't see this ending well but it probably will. The hypocrisy by Twitter is staggering against the over reach by Trump which is easily over turned -
The hypocrisy the humanity the somethingcreepycoug said:
Zuckerberg seems to be casting stones while living in a glass house. Doesn't facebook police content now?RaceBannon said:Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has called out Twitter for attaching a fact check to a tweet from President Trump, telling Fox News' Dana Perino that privately-owned digital platforms should not act as the "arbiter of truth."
I don't see this ending well but it probably will. The hypocrisy by Twitter is staggering against the over reach by Trump which is easily over turned
Another 48 hours of all Trump all the time -
lott
Don’t you have homework or something?HustlinOwl said:So the President rails against fake news since we've known him, but when he's called out on his own fake news he whines like a baby. Pretty much a nothingburger when it come to this clown.
-
They tagged an obvious joke as false informationcreepycoug said:
Zuckerberg seems to be casting stones while living in a glass house. Doesn't facebook police content now?RaceBannon said:Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has called out Twitter for attaching a fact check to a tweet from President Trump, telling Fox News' Dana Perino that privately-owned digital platforms should not act as the "arbiter of truth."
I don't see this ending well but it probably will. The hypocrisy by Twitter is staggering against the over reach by Trump which is easily over turned
and warned/banned me for writing dyke and faggot and some other stuff -
Problem Twitter and all these idiots have is that if they “fact-check” anything, then they implicitly endorse anything posted on their platform that they don’t “fact-check”. And the fact Twitter has been the ChiCom’s publicity path of choice for the last little while doesn’t help their cause.
They are either a completely free-speech forum or a publisher with the responsibilities/liabilities that come with it...you can’t be a little of one and a little of the other.
And they still need to break up a bunch of big tech including Facebook and Google. -
Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
Exactly. Also why Trump is a democrat.incremetal_progress said:Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
Twitter chose to become a Publisher instead. Try and keep upincremetal_progress said:Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
You guys keep saying that. What the fuck does that mean? Honestly, what's the distinction?doogie said:
Twitter chose to become a Publisher instead. Try and keep upincremetal_progress said:Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
Editorial control vs passive posting
Twitter was warned of the risks of exerting editorial control over the postings of its users. It now has additional liability from the content posted they were formerly exempt from. -
Having the chicoms control our pharmaceuticals is stupid. Having Facebook and Google control our social media is stupid and illegal under our antitrust laws. If they were equal on their application of denying access I wouldn't be so concerned. But they aren't. They supported the fake news about the Russian collusion and the fake news about the chicom crud as they kowtow to the chicoms. Break them up.incremetal_progress said:Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
You guys keep saying that. What the fuck does that mean? Honestly, what's the distinction?doogie said:
Twitter chose to become a Publisher instead. Try and keep upincremetal_progress said:Shouldn't those arguing for small government not be for government regulation over private social media platforms?
-
-
Everyone does it
The president is not alone in his criticism of Section 230. Former Vice President Biden, in a January interview with The New York Times, said that Section 230 “should be revoked, immediately should be revoked” because Facebook “is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy.”
Nothing to see here
Trump crafts executive order on social media, weighs commission to probe bias amid Twitter fight
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-crafts-executive-order-on-social-media-weighs-commission-to-probe-bias-amid-twitter-fight -
Someone should tell Jack Dorsey that he probably should stay out of the DOJ crosshairs - defending anti-trust allegations are time-consuming and expensive. He'll probably fuck over Facebook and Google, too, if he keeps tarding around. Zuck is already backpedaling like a Cuog defensive back.RaceBannon said:Everyone does it
The president is not alone in his criticism of Section 230. Former Vice President Biden, in a January interview with The New York Times, said that Section 230 “should be revoked, immediately should be revoked” because Facebook “is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy.”
Nothing to see here
Trump crafts executive order on social media, weighs commission to probe bias amid Twitter fight
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-crafts-executive-order-on-social-media-weighs-commission-to-probe-bias-amid-twitter-fight
Trump is doing Dorsey a favor with a friendly Executive Order as a love tap.
-
Twitter bought the false narrative that they helped Hillary lose. They lost their way vowing never again
Never forget who you are
-
sounds like Biden will be voting for TrumpRaceBannon said:Everyone does it
The president is not alone in his criticism of Section 230. Former Vice President Biden, in a January interview with The New York Times, said that Section 230 “should be revoked, immediately should be revoked” because Facebook “is propagating falsehoods they know to be false, and we should be setting standards not unlike the Europeans are doing relative to privacy.”
Nothing to see here
Trump crafts executive order on social media, weighs commission to probe bias amid Twitter fight
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-crafts-executive-order-on-social-media-weighs-commission-to-probe-bias-amid-twitter-fight
-
-
-
SadRaceBannon said: -
Trump needs Twitter and Twitter needs Trump. Trying to take an (unenforceable) axe to 230 would only push Twitter to further censor their content to reduce liability. I've got a hunch that his tweets would be some of the first to go under that new model.
But of course this is all smoke weed and talk shit posturing. This EA is toothless and nothing will happen. -
Trump and Sawant and their crusade to take down the tech giants. Strange bedfellows.GrundleStiltzkin said:
