More reporting on the fact that there is no concrete evidence showing Russia hacked the DNC
Comments
-
RelievedSwaye said:
There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.HHusky said:
Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.Swaye said:
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?HHusky said:
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee? -
DNC email talking points alert
-
The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.RaceBannon said:
Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?HHusky said:
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?
I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you. -
So your proof of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.RaceBannon said:
Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?HHusky said:
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?
I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you.
Because the guys that did the investigation say they didn't.
You've been wrong or lying since day 1 on this. Why stop now?
You've been wrong on everything. You're house of cards is continuing to collapse before our eyes as we see the Obama team trampling the constitution to get to Trump.
Fuck off -
That's a good cocksucker, believe whatever you betters tell you is true. Explains why you swallowed like a bitch the whole Trump Russian collusion story. I don't believe Russia, I believe evidence and so far the best your side has is "trust us"HHusky said:
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee? -
He has been wrong on everything, but this time is he is going to get it right.RaceBannon said:
So your proof of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
The fact that Democrats and Republicans can agree on anything these days is compelling for me.RaceBannon said:
Once again your evidence of Russian hacking is what?HHusky said:
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?
I can't prove it's not a Deep State conspiracy though, so you got that going for you.
Because the guys that did the investigation say they didn't.
You've been wrong or lying since day 1 on this. Why stop now?
You've been wrong on everything. You're house of cards is continuing to collapse before our eyes as we see the Obama team trampling the constitution to get to Trump.
Fuck off
-
Like a child, Dazzler believes whatever his mommy and daddy tell him, even after his mommy and daddy have been caught lying to him about the Dossier, Russian collusion, the Trump Tower meeting, General Flynn, Carter Page, Papadopoulos. But this time, despite any evidence to the contrary, and directly counter to the Crowdstrike CEO's sworn testimony that the has no concrete evidence that the Russians were behind the hack, this time Dazzler knows they are telling him the truth.
-
I've watched some really wild porn lately that may offend sensibilities.Swaye said:
There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.HHusky said:
Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.Swaye said:
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
No such thing.Pitchfork51 said:
I've watched some really wild porn lately that may offend sensibilities.Swaye said:
There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.HHusky said:
Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.Swaye said:
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
