More reporting on the fact that there is no concrete evidence showing Russia hacked the DNC
CrowdStrike, the private cyber-security firm that first accused Russia of hacking Democratic Party emails and served as a critical source for U.S. intelligence officials in the years-long Trump-Russia probe, acknowledged to Congress more than two years ago that it had no concrete evidence that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee’s server.
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
Comments
-
Brennan supposedly will be revealed to have hidden evidence that Putin wanted Hillary
The main problem with Russia collusion from day 1 was anyone with half a brain knew that -
So what?
The economy is closed. Maybe not ‘your’ economy for the time being but it’s really the only thing that matters. -
Who needs evidence? Trump dances to Putin's tune obvs
-
This is how the mind of a rat works. We have proof from amateur open mic night that BO sucked putin dick. We know that The Bitch and the dem party colluded with Russia to dream up a completely false dossier on Trump. Yet lying libs claim it is Trump who is in putins back pocket.Pitchfork51 said:Who needs evidence? Trump dances to Putin's tune obvs
If it wasn't such a pathetic and obvious attempt at lying by rats it would be funny. -
You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.Swaye said:
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this. -
There is nothing you could ever do to offend my sensibilities.HHusky said:
Sorry to have offended your tender sensibilities.Swaye said:
You've really taken ownership of the girls, gals and ladies thing huh? I mean, you've gone all in.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
-
We clearly need to make our methods of detection public. Until then, the only patriotic thing for you to do is believe Russia.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes the same "bipartisan" Senate Committee that unquestionably swallowed Brennan's phony conclusion that the Russians wanted Trump to win the election. I believe that Committee is headed up by the totally not corrupt Richard Burr.HHusky said:You girls all on the RT payroll now? "Guccifer" was two or more GRU officers. And yes, I believe that bipartisan conclusion of the intelligence committees, shared by our entire intelligence community, more than your desperate RW "news" sources. How are you paid, ladies?
Since everyone know that the Russians did the hacking surely it should be easy enough for these 17 intelligence agencies to provide the evidence they have to support this but the guy who actually performed the forensic analysis of the servers, that everyone else relied upon for their conclusion says he has no concrete evidence to support it.
But surely a cocksucker like yourself has the real goods on all of this.
Burr's corruption is a diversion, of course. And the rest of the committee?
