Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
DM to HHusky you have chosen the role of board attorney, yes?
doogie
Member Posts: 15,072
in Tug Tavern
Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
Comments
-
Lionel Hutz @HHusky isn’t a criminal attorney. He did work comp cases and profited on his clients’ misery. He’s admitted his legal career in one of his many meltdowns on The Woodshed.
-
Now you’re just getting desperate, there was no prosecutorial misconduct.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true -
I believe HH is a respected legal source in dog licensing.NorthwestFresh said:Lionel Hutz @HHusky isn’t a criminal attorney. He did work comp cases and profited on his clients’ misery. He’s admitted his legal career in one of his many meltdowns on The Woodshed.
-
Shocked that O’Keefed dodged your question.
-
Recent photo of HH after scoring a big legal victory
-
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now. -
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now. -
“A federal judge.” Funny you don’t poont out who that judge is, but we know why. Van Gack dropped the charges and recused himself from all cases. Totally understandable when you believe you’re doing the right thing. He’s fucked.HHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call more attention to his lack of credibility.
You used to try harder, Lionel. You’ve lost your mediocre fastball, your change-up isn’t Moyer-level, your location is imprecise, so you’re serving up taters on a platter these days. We both know why you still post though. -
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.RaceBannon said:
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020 -
That Jew lawyerGreenRiverGatorz said:Recent photo of HH after scoring a big legal victory
-
PatheticHHusky said:
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.RaceBannon said:
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020 -
Compelling argumentRaceBannon said:
PatheticHHusky said:
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.RaceBannon said:
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020 -
Still waiting on one from youHHusky said:
Compelling argumentRaceBannon said:
PatheticHHusky said:
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.RaceBannon said:
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020 -
You're a fucking psychopathHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
Boredom? I missed your response in the other thread I asked about the old educk days. What was your handle and is that fool Snotty69 still around here? How about Rambo?NorthwestFresh said:
“A federal judge.” Funny you don’t poont out who that judge is, but we know why. Van Gack dropped the charges and recused himself from all cases. Totally understandable when you believe you’re doing the right thing. He’s fucked.HHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call more attention to his lack of credibility.
You used to try harder, Lionel. You’ve lost your mediocre fastball, your change-up isn’t Moyer-level, your location is imprecise, so you’re serving up taters on a platter these days. We both know why you still post though. -
Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion -
You've had a chance to read the documents. They were everything Barr claimed and more. Maybe you can point out where he lied. I guess shopping cart accident law has different standards.HHusky said:
Compelling argumentRaceBannon said:
PatheticHHusky said:
“As noted earlier, the Court has reviewed the version of the Mueller Report, Attorney General Barr’s representations made during his April 18, 2019 press conference, and Attorney General Barr’s April 18, 2019 letter. And, the Court cannot reconcile certain public representations made by Attorney General Barr with the findings in the Mueller Report. The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary.RaceBannon said:
Pure gibberishHHusky said:
Van Grack can’t really defend himself publicly. Given that the DOJ moved to dismiss the Flynn prosecution during the very same week that a Federal Judge explicitly found that AG Barr lacks credibility in connection with the Russia investigation, I’ll await the disciplinary and/or disbarment proceedings against Van Grack you girls have been calling for.doogie said:Legal Q for you.
Did The Mueller Team Violate Brady and Flynn Orders?
https://jonathanturley.org/2020/05/05/did-the-mueller-team-violate-brady/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
I don’t think AG Butterball really wants to see any of that. Might call even more attention to his lack of credibility. He doesn’t want to trigger a public response from Van Grack. Might tend to support the obvious conclusion that the DOJ represents Daddy now.
These circumstances generally, and Attorney General Barr’s lack of candor specifically, call into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility . . . .”
District Court Judge Reggie Walton, May 5, 2020
Show us where the bad Orange man and Mean AG touched you on this doll! -
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.RaceBannon said:Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
And apparently the accusations of Butterball’s dishonesty aren’t limited to those made by Republican appointed federal judges. https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/497044-former-doj-official-department-twisted-my-words-in-motion-to-drop -
You mean like Obama and Kerry Logan act stuff or something else?HHusky said:
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.RaceBannon said:Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
And apparently the accusations of Butterball’s dishonesty aren’t limited to those made by Republican appointed federal judges. https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/497044-former-doj-official-department-twisted-my-words-in-motion-to-drop -
You know the Dazzler has a strong case when he is attacking Barr’s physical appearance. You’ll notice that he no longer even touches his lie about there being no prosecutorial misconduct.HHusky said:
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.RaceBannon said:Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
And apparently the accusations of Butterball’s dishonesty aren’t limited to those made by Republican appointed federal judges. https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/497044-former-doj-official-department-twisted-my-words-in-motion-to-drop -
Barr is morbidly obese! Funny how Lionel Hutz was a few days ahead of that from Pelosi. Her staff must get their Dozens ideas from nutball sites DAILYkos and DemocratUnderground. You can’t beat Trump at Dozens.SFGbob said:
You know the Dazzler has a strong case when he is attacking Barr’s physical appearance. You’ll notice that he no longer even touches his lie about there being no prosecutorial misconduct.HHusky said:
Whatever you think of the Logan Act, some of us haven’t forgotten that Flynn’s plea deal allowed him to escape prosecution for his acting as a foreign agent without registering.RaceBannon said:Washington Post had 'divisions in the newsroom' over Flynn's Russia calls, before publishing opinion piece
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-michael-flynn-russia-divisions-opinion
And apparently the accusations of Butterball’s dishonesty aren’t limited to those made by Republican appointed federal judges. https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/497044-former-doj-official-department-twisted-my-words-in-motion-to-drop
