There's just no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct
https://youtu.be/Imhbncy9RJg Comments
-
I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
-
Seriously, this story is pissing me off more now than it did 3 years ago. They never had any evidence that Trump and his campaign had colluded with the Russians, and the Rats and the media and former members of the Obama Administration spent 3 plus years lying about it and claiming they did.
And Tucker is right, the Senate GOP but for a few like Grassley and Johnson have been next to worthless. -
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole? -
It seems Tucker's semantic games are similar to your own.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole? -
-
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole? -
Crowdstrike imaged the entire DNC server. That's how the work is done.NorthwestFresh said:
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
The whole retarded narrative of you gals hinges on Tucker's implication that circumstantial evidence is somehow lesser or inferior to other kinds of evidence. Of course, you understand the game you're playing, Boris. blob may not. -
Your evidence of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
Crowdstrike imaged the entire DNC server. That's how the work is done.NorthwestFresh said:
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
The whole retarded narrative of you gals hinges on Tucker's implication that circumstantial evidence is somehow lesser or inferior to other kinds of evidence. Of course, you understand the game you're playing, Boris. blob may not. -
Crowdstrike said so until they didn’t say so under oath.RaceBannon said:
Your evidence of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
Crowdstrike imaged the entire DNC server. That's how the work is done.NorthwestFresh said:
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
The whole retarded narrative of you gals hinges on Tucker's implication that circumstantial evidence is somehow lesser or inferior to other kinds of evidence. Of course, you understand the game you're playing, Boris. blob may not.
How about James Clapper all over TV pushing collusion for years even after he said the opposite under oath. It’s like being a lying piece of shit is a prerequisite to be a good liberal like Lionel. -
do we* care about witness tampering?
Michael Caputo, a now cleared target of the Mueller investigation, has released text messages that purport to show Swalwell committed witness tampering. This was in relation to Caputo’s testimony before the special counsel
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/05/09/michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell&utm_content=0&utm_campaign=Post -
Makes me wonder how many of the poors and minorities Schiff and Swallwell lied about or manufactured evidence against when they were federal prosecutors. Schiff obviously has no relationship with honesty.doogie said:do we* care about witness tampering?
Michael Caputo, a now cleared target of the Mueller investigation, has released text messages that purport to show Swalwell committed witness tampering. This was in relation to Caputo’s testimony before the special counsel
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/05/09/michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell&utm_content=0&utm_campaign=Post -
Says the Kunt who won't even answer the question about if Hillary really did collude with the Russians. You're the fucking king of semantics games O'Keefed, it's all you fucking have. You certainly don't have the truth on your side.HHusky said:
It seems Tucker's semantic games are similar to your own.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
Weird you're now talking about the Russian hacking and not the fact that you talked out of your ass about there being no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct being revealed this week. -
His snatch.RaceBannon said:
Your evidence of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
Crowdstrike imaged the entire DNC server. That's how the work is done.NorthwestFresh said:
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
The whole retarded narrative of you gals hinges on Tucker's implication that circumstantial evidence is somehow lesser or inferior to other kinds of evidence. Of course, you understand the game you're playing, Boris. blob may not.
