There's just no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct
Comments
-
Makes me wonder how many of the poors and minorities Schiff and Swallwell lied about or manufactured evidence against when they were federal prosecutors. Schiff obviously has no relationship with honesty.doogie said:do we* care about witness tampering?
Michael Caputo, a now cleared target of the Mueller investigation, has released text messages that purport to show Swalwell committed witness tampering. This was in relation to Caputo’s testimony before the special counsel
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/05/09/michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell/?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell&utm_content=0&utm_campaign=Post -
Says the Kunt who won't even answer the question about if Hillary really did collude with the Russians. You're the fucking king of semantics games O'Keefed, it's all you fucking have. You certainly don't have the truth on your side.HHusky said:
It seems Tucker's semantic games are similar to your own.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
Weird you're now talking about the Russian hacking and not the fact that you talked out of your ass about there being no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct being revealed this week. -
His snatch.RaceBannon said:
Your evidence of Russia hacking is what?HHusky said:
Crowdstrike imaged the entire DNC server. That's how the work is done.NorthwestFresh said:
LACoug spent months arguing that it was OK the FBI didn’t search the DNC servers because Crowdstrike was so much more competent than the FBI. Turns out Crowdstrike didn’t have any proof at all.SFGbob said:
Actually, the CEO of Crowdstrike said that they had no concrete evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. Who compensates you for being the lying asshole you are O'Keefed?HHusky said:I’m awfully impressed with an 11 minute screed that actually claims we don’t know that Russian intelligence hacked the DNC server. You should be embarrassed. At least Tucker is well compensated for spewing bullshit. You’re doing it for free.
Does the prosecutor lying to the court about the reasons behind why they interrogated Flynn count as prosecutorial misconduct asshole?
The whole retarded narrative of you gals hinges on Tucker's implication that circumstantial evidence is somehow lesser or inferior to other kinds of evidence. Of course, you understand the game you're playing, Boris. blob may not.
