Your final grade for Sark?
Comments
-
A+
Best play caller in America
Great recruiter, everybody says so
Kick ass pressers and memorials
Master motivator
Hip style
Big time on social media
-
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F. -
pressingsarktastic said:A+
Sark is the greatest coach to ever grace the sidelines of Husky Stadium. It's a shame that an unproven coach will now be given credit for the foundation he set and the personal sacrifice he made for UW.
As Sark returns USC to Carroll'esque glory, HHB's will regret the day they drove him away. The crime in all this is that they will never be held accountable for the permanent damage they've caused the program as they hid behind their anonymity. -
How is Willingham anything but an F?HeretoBeatmyChest said:I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F. -
Gladstone said:
How is Willingham anything but an F?HeretoBeatmyChest said:I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
this. Willingham gets a fucking Z -
I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.
Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark. -
FO, GTheGlove said:A+
Best play caller in America
Great recruiter, everybody says so
Kick ass pressers and memorials
Master motivator
Hip style
Big time on social media -
The fuck? Grades are allowed in Seattle?
-
Oh god here comes the Wilcox love fest again. Improved us from 5-4 to 5-4.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.
If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.
He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.
Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F. -
That's why you give Ty an F and Sark a D.HeretoBeatmyChest said:I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.
Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
HTH.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)