Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Your final grade for Sark?
BabsGilbyTawdTy
Member Posts: 1,058
Since maybe the smoke has cleared a little since his departure to USC, I'd like to see how folks here would grade Steve Sarkisian's time in charge of our beloved UW Football program from December 8, 2008 to December 2, 2013.
B-minus
No real indication Sark was figuring shit out and the program was headed to the upper echelon of the conference.
B-minus
No real indication Sark was figuring shit out and the program was headed to the upper echelon of the conference.
Comments
-
-
C. I think he's a B recruiter and a D coach.
Just because Ty and Boobs were fucking Fs doesn't elevate a MEDIOCRE coach. -
-
-
C +
The more I think about it (and listen to fucksticks on here), 2009 was mostly a coach bounce. His true colors started to show with the 3-6 start in 2010. I should have listened to @DerekJohnson and @whlinder .
He recrooooted pretty well, but player development, general discipline, and playcalling were average if that. We can and finally did get better. -
I give him a 7
-
D+
He could have been a solid B or B+ with effort ... Fucker was lazy and selfish. -
C+
A C as a coach and recruiter.
The + is for at least having a good time at Joey's. -
C-, Petersen will show what a REAL coach can accomplish at Washington. Not to mention Sark will get exposed at USC.
Special Teams were always bad. If the offense was good then the defense sucked, if defense was good then offense sucked.
As a recruiter he was okay. Didn't sign one 4 star OL since his 2010 class.
His teams could never rise up on the road against a decent team, often plunger raped.
Took 6th place in year 5 which had everyone returning. Nuff said. -
1.87
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
