Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Making Sense of a Disastrous NFL Draft for the Huskies
Comments
-
Peterman was smoke and mirrorscreepycoug said:I'll help you make sense of it: they weren't that good.
Shaq wasn't good because Sarkesian; he was just good.
That's how it mostly works.
And didn't develop shit
Should have been molded by a real man like clay -
This ain’t the Mountain West
-
I never counted on #3. FSP may be an advantage in recruiting to some extent, but they aren't promoting the UW, they are promoting themselves. If that means repping a guy getting a USC offer or an ASU offer they do it. They don't seem to be steering anybody our way. As for as training, never counted on that at all. Most of those videos I see posted on Twitter are toe-tapping makework bullshit. All that cone-dancing, hallway sprinting, triple-move route nonsense does nothing except waste training time, IMO.dnc said:It was such a weird year. Since Pete came we have had a few things to count on when it comes to NFL draftees.
1. Our guys would develop well beyond their star ratings.
2. Our strength and conditioning would be a big part of this.
3. Tracy Ford and FSP were an advantage for us both in recruiting and in training.
4. Ultimately we would get a number of players drafted and many above expectations.
All four of those things cratered simultaneously.
Complete clusterfuck.
You take away that, it kills the rest of it. Maybe our S&C would have helped and guys would develop beyond their star ratings, but once out of the program and in the hands of outsiders, all that could be lost.
As far as Eason, I don't know his deal personally, but a part of that could also be our shit offense. Aaron Rodgers even looked just okay with Mike McCarthy.

