Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know.
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.)
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know. UW did not pursue:Ayden HectorGee ScottDJ RogersUW did pursue:Sam AdamsPete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed.
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know. UW did not pursue:Ayden HectorGee ScottDJ RogersUW did pursue:Sam AdamsPete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed. I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him?
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know. UW did not pursue:Ayden HectorGee ScottDJ RogersUW did pursue:Sam AdamsPete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed. I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him? Dude I like his tape
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know. UW did not pursue:Ayden HectorGee ScottDJ RogersUW did pursue:Sam AdamsPete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed. I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him? Dude I like his tape He hit the hole hard. Stayed up after contact. Good endurance. Didn't show a lot of versatility or ball skills.
Just poast screenshots of the twats, they're all getting deleted...
Other than Hector, who we know was a "witness", only three members of EC graduating class of 2020 are going to play D1 football at "prestigious" universities unless PSU is considered prestigious. I don't think I need to lay out the logic puzzle steps here any further (unless one of the kids was 2021 please god no.) How, then, does one explain the offers CP did and didn't make for the class of 2020. He was clearly in the know. UW did not pursue:Ayden HectorGee ScottDJ RogersUW did pursue:Sam AdamsPete is not infallible, but this story was the reasoning behind not giving Rogers an offer, so I would imagine that extends to the other recruiting decisions made on those players. If Pete knew Adams may have been involved and offered him anyway, I would be severely disappointed. I don’t even like Adams as a player but who cares if Pete offered him? Dude I like his tape He hit the hole hard. Stayed up after contact. Good endurance. Didn't show a lot of versatility or ball skills. Are we talking Hudl or Snapchat?
https://www.king5.com/article/news/four-eastside-catholic-football-players-were-suspected-of-sexual-assault-in-2018-none-was-charged-with-a-crime/281-c06707f0-8287-461c-9128-c1423f287c9d
Six pages on Eastside Catholic....and not a single pic of sluts in school uniforms.Sad.
https://www.king5.com/article/news/four-eastside-catholic-football-players-were-suspected-of-sexual-assault-in-2018-none-was-charged-with-a-crime/281-c06707f0-8287-461c-9128-c1423f287c9d * Police recommended charges. Two people to be charged with rape, one with rape of a child (he was 18, victim was 16, in Washington 17 is the age of consent) also knew that child porn was filmed and distributed. * Clyde Hill police couldn't get the video because it was Snapchat. Went to the cyber people at Bellevue police, who also couldn't get it. * DA's office chose not to press charges. Because this is one of the hardest cases to prove and DAs hate to ruin their stats. Maybe more to this. * The person filming the video was one of two people in the cab of the truck, and was allegedly an Eastside Catholic football player. Out of the two people in the cab only one was an Eastside Catholic player. We now know who that was. QUESTIONS:* How could they have not recovered the video? If CP distribution was involved, why did they not contact the FBI or someone more qualified than the Bellevue PD? Also, if other people saw the video including the kid they interviewed, that is no longer hearsay.* Why wasn't the 18 year old charged, at least with statutory? * The three football players who signed with "prestigious universities" - who could that be? We know 1/3. We're also told its not Ohio State. Where else have Eastside players signed from the 2019 or 2020 classes, prestigious school or not? That I was able to find, including walk-ons: Cal, Washington, Portland State 2x, Idaho State, UCLA 2x, Western Oregon, Air Force. I looked up walk-ons as well since I'm guessing the writer may not be familiar with the intricacies of teen boy stalking.It is good that the police actually investigated and recommended charges, but I'm getting a bit of a Keystone Cops vibe. And a DA who didn't want to file charges, citing lack of evidence that would make them have to work.
https://www.king5.com/article/news/four-eastside-catholic-football-players-were-suspected-of-sexual-assault-in-2018-none-was-charged-with-a-crime/281-c06707f0-8287-461c-9128-c1423f287c9d * Police recommended charges. Two people to be charged with rape, one with rape of a child (he was 18, victim was 16, in Washington 17 is the age of consent) also knew that child porn was filmed and distributed. * Clyde Hill police couldn't get the video because it was Snapchat. Went to the cyber people at Bellevue police, who also couldn't get it. * DA's office chose not to press charges. Because this is one of the hardest cases to prove and DAs hate to ruin their stats. Maybe more to this. * The person filming the video was one of two people in the cab of the truck, and was allegedly an Eastside Catholic football player. Out of the two people in the cab only one was an Eastside Catholic player. We now know who that was. QUESTIONS:* How could they have not recovered the video? If CP distribution was involved, why did they not contact the FBI or someone more qualified than the Bellevue PD? Also, if other people saw the video including the kid they interviewed, that is no longer hearsay.* Why wasn't the 18 year old charged, at least with statutory? * The three football players who signed with "prestigious universities" - who could that be? We know 1/3. We're also told its not Ohio State. Where else have Eastside players signed from the 2019 or 2020 classes, prestigious school or not? That I was able to find, including walk-ons: Cal, Washington, Portland State 2x, Idaho State, UCLA 2x, Western Oregon, Air Force. I looked up walk-ons as well since I'm guessing the writer may not be familiar with the intricacies of teen boy stalking.It is good that the police actually investigated and recommended charges, but I'm getting a bit of a Keystone Cops vibe. And a DA who didn't want to file charges, citing lack of evidence that would make them have to work. 2020:Stanford, Cal, OSU, UW and PSU (x2)2019 doesn't count since the article specifically states all three are still attending EC.Where did you see that the person filming was in the truck? That was my initial assumption but given that Hector is specifically stated to be a witness I came around to thinking it must have been one of the guys in the truck bed doing the raping.
