Found this on wearesc.com
If only there was some site that could have warned them.
Comments
-
The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense.
they don't call him the best playcaller in the nation for nothing -
There's a reason why SC is always good - they expect greatness and know what it looks like.
Sark hasn't coached a game yet and they know he's not the guy.
The under on 3.5 years for Sark is looking like a strong favorite right now. -
thread already delivers
-
Sounds like a bruin or stanford troll trying to cause trouble. Sark is a great coach.
-
Link?
-
-
alright, who wrote that?
-
Are you sure this wasn't a recap of our spring game last year?
-
Found another poast on wearesc.com. This one is from username "KimG"
Boy, lot of negativity in here. I thought the spring game looked good. The playcalling is designed to make up for any shortcomings in the O-Line. OL is overrated-- that's the genius of bubble screens. Sark did that at Washington, and just look at how badly he beat Oregon State. Anyone who says otherwise is twisting my words. Don't be a twister. I'm hearing from sources that Sark is going to own the Pac-12 south. Just what I'm hearing. Stay tuned.
I don't know who the hell wrote that nonsense, but it looks like SWS has at least one fan. -
http://www.wearesc.com/forums/forum/main-category/main-forum/109929-observations-at-usc-spring-game-2014
Scroll down..post by "Paris"Gladstone said:Link?
-
Don'tBeaTwisterDawg is still available at Hartdcore Husky
-
Sounds like the next user name for QuornDawg when one of his handles gets banned.DerekJohnson said:Don'tBeaTwisterDawg is still available at Hartdcore Husky
-
the other beauty of Sark's offense is going to be the number of 3 and outs his speedy paced shitstorm results in and then, the lack of depth will catch up with the defense and they'll get tired early on and then post-game kick ass pressers will sound like this.
"We just needed to make a few plays on offense and it's a different game... we don't have depth right now due to sanctions..." (queue the woe is me sound bite from pre-spring). -
they don't call him the best playcaller in the nation for nothingdhdawg said:The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense.
This is a perfect description of our offense last year. Sark thought, "hey, Chip Kelly was succesful by running plays quickly and catching the other team off guard. That's what I'll do."
What he didn't realize was that running plays quickly was only a small part of why Chip's offense worked. Blocking schemes and receiver routes were a much more important part of Oregon's offense. I remember watching Oregon a couple years ago and on a botched qb rollout the RB came back into the play and blocked a linebacker and the center (Grassu) ran 20 yards down field to block a safety allowing Mariota to get score once he got loose. This has to be taught and practiced through discipline. Sark saw this and said "duh, they fast and they win. I run fast plays too. I win".
The problem is, as USC will soon find out, is that if you run 3 quick shitty plays with undisciplined players who don't know their assignments, you get a 45 second possession with a 3 and out. A bubble-screen to a covered receiver without blockers is only going to net you 2 yards 95% of the time. It doesn't matter how quickly you run it. Then your defense is on the field for way too long, you fall behind, and then your play book gets that much smaller.
Sark's offense is "same shitty plays, but way faster" -
I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again. -
Sark has one of the best agents in the business. I have no idea who in the hell he is but he helped get him the job at SC and had his name in NFL coaching searches and even Arkansas at one point (No way Sark takes a job where they fire you for lying about your affairs with co-eds).He_Needs_More_Time said:I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
After SC he will land a coordinator job or lower level D1 school. -
Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst. -
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
-
True...hes probably the type of guy who thinks he'll be making his current salary for a long time.dnc said:
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst. -
bingoHeretoBeatmyChest said:
True...hes probably the type of guy who thinks he'll be making his current salary for a long time.dnc said:
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
-
It was a very small moment but I thought Justin Wilcox yelling "9 wins" on his way out the door was very telling. These guys actually think they did a great job at Washington. From 0-12 to 9 wins brah. Sark and his boys actually believe the bullshit they're selling. In that context it's not at all surprising that Sark took the job.He_Needs_More_Time said:I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again. -
Damn I expect that nonsense from Sark but I figured Wilcox was above that garbage. I gotta say I was disappointed in Wilcox choosing to go with Sark.allpurpleallgold said:
It was a very small moment but I thought Justin Wilcox yelling "9 wins" on his way out the door was very telling. These guys actually think they did a great job at Washington. From 0-12 to 9 wins brah. Sark and his boys actually believe the bullshit they're selling. In that context it's not at all surprising that Sark took the job.He_Needs_More_Time said:I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
You are right that Sark thinks his tenure at Washington was a success. He's had so many up here in the media who have blown him the last few years telling him how great he is that I think he actually believes he inherited a true 0-12 program.
-
Kiffin's agent killed it too. My theory is they got into the right LA social circles because of their affiliations to USC's dominance. There were tons of celebrities around and no NFL team. The Hollywood types saw dollar signs and they have all laughed all the way to the bank despite Sark and Kiffin being bad coaches. The wonderboy reputations and great agents have been a lethal combination.AtomicDawg said:
Sark has one of the best agents in the business. I have no idea who in the hell he is but he helped get him the job at SC and had his name in NFL coaching searches and even Arkansas at one point (No way Sark takes a job where they fire you for lying about your affairs with co-eds).He_Needs_More_Time said:I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
After SC he will land a coordinator job or lower level D1 school.
I wouldn't be one bit surprised if Sark gets another BCS job after he gets fired at USC. Some shitty program will pay him 2+ million because he has "proven" he can turn a program around. After all, UW was 0-12 when he was hired! -
I read somewhere Sarks daddy was some so cal real estate developer and he and his buddies were long term USC big time boosters for years.
-
Some of you are forgetting:
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach...
-
I don't know if this post is a whoosh or not, but the bold isn't true. UW had better WR's and a better RB too. USC also lost 4 OL from last year's team. They already have a true freshman starting at guard. It's not that talented of an offense. UW's offense was good last year, but froze up and under achieved against the good teams. The offense was very average and even sucked in the 4 years before that. He's not a good OC, let alone a good head coach.priapism said:Some of you are forgetting:
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach... -
Hope this is a whoosh. Otherwise you just ruined a great handle.priapism said:Some of you are forgetting:
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach...
-
Can you quote this "Great" coach and his offensive numbers from 2009, 2010, and 2012? Sark had two good years of offense, one average(2009) and two shit years(2010 and 2012).priapism said:Some of you are forgetting:
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach...
Sark was all over the place offensively and against the good teams his teams didn't do jack shit. -
That post was a woosh. It came from some USC dbag in that thread who was trying to reassure the other posters there.
-
Whoosh.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
