Found this on wearesc.com
Comments
-
Don'tBeaTwisterDawg is still available at Hartdcore Husky
-
Sounds like the next user name for QuornDawg when one of his handles gets banned.DerekJohnson said:Don'tBeaTwisterDawg is still available at Hartdcore Husky
-
the other beauty of Sark's offense is going to be the number of 3 and outs his speedy paced shitstorm results in and then, the lack of depth will catch up with the defense and they'll get tired early on and then post-game kick ass pressers will sound like this.
"We just needed to make a few plays on offense and it's a different game... we don't have depth right now due to sanctions..." (queue the woe is me sound bite from pre-spring). -
they don't call him the best playcaller in the nation for nothingdhdawg said:The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense.
This is a perfect description of our offense last year. Sark thought, "hey, Chip Kelly was succesful by running plays quickly and catching the other team off guard. That's what I'll do."
What he didn't realize was that running plays quickly was only a small part of why Chip's offense worked. Blocking schemes and receiver routes were a much more important part of Oregon's offense. I remember watching Oregon a couple years ago and on a botched qb rollout the RB came back into the play and blocked a linebacker and the center (Grassu) ran 20 yards down field to block a safety allowing Mariota to get score once he got loose. This has to be taught and practiced through discipline. Sark saw this and said "duh, they fast and they win. I run fast plays too. I win".
The problem is, as USC will soon find out, is that if you run 3 quick shitty plays with undisciplined players who don't know their assignments, you get a 45 second possession with a 3 and out. A bubble-screen to a covered receiver without blockers is only going to net you 2 yards 95% of the time. It doesn't matter how quickly you run it. Then your defense is on the field for way too long, you fall behind, and then your play book gets that much smaller.
Sark's offense is "same shitty plays, but way faster" -
I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again. -
Sark has one of the best agents in the business. I have no idea who in the hell he is but he helped get him the job at SC and had his name in NFL coaching searches and even Arkansas at one point (No way Sark takes a job where they fire you for lying about your affairs with co-eds).He_Needs_More_Time said:I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.
They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
After SC he will land a coordinator job or lower level D1 school. -
Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst. -
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
-
True...hes probably the type of guy who thinks he'll be making his current salary for a long time.dnc said:
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst. -
bingoHeretoBeatmyChest said:
True...hes probably the type of guy who thinks he'll be making his current salary for a long time.dnc said:
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.
He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.
He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
