Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who is Chris Landon?

chuck
chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,805 Swaye's Wigwam
in Hardcore Husky Board
http://www.uwdawgpound.com/2014/4/20/5633366/the-early-missteps-of-chris-petersen

Pen name?

Don't be a twister. Either way it will be interesting.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,805 Swaye's Wigwam
    I should add that I ask because I'm new to UW Doogpound. Went there for the first time a couple of months ago and have only visited 3-4 times.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited April 2014
    I don't waste my time with those jokers. They are shit tier version of Doogman and Akita. They are lowest of the Doogs.


    Edit: Just read this bullshit article. Holy fuck is he trying to be like Kim. Love how he rags on Petersen then quickly says I'm not ragging on Petersen I think he's doing a good job.

    Love how the fuck is questioning how Petersen handles discipline and praises Sark for how he handled ASJ and Kasen. When in reality Sark did nothing to Kasen and didn't announce ASJ until two days before the game when he was probably ruled out due to injury.

    I can sort of understand Kim's agenda which is access but what fucks like these clowns or Akita's agenda? To be like Kim? Talk about living a miserable and pathetic life.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    The problem is there are no positive adult media role models in their lives.

    Monkey see monkey do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Gladstone said:

    Mad_Son said:

    The problem is there are no positive adult media role models in their lives.

    Monkey see monkey do.

    Not since Bob C. left, anyways. Bob was the consummate professional. As for the article, I agree with others. Mind-numbingly stupid. I guess I just don't understand the doog endgame. Juxtapose this: (A) A decidedly mediocre, middle-of-the-road coach. A coach who went 0-5 vs his rival with 5 blowouts. A coach who went 25-24 against D1 opponents. A coach who made excuses every step of the way. A coach bereft of championship-level work ethic. (B) A coach who went a staggering 92-12 at his past job. A coach who was coveted by every program in the nation. A coach who won national coach of the year honors twice. A coach who won two BCS bowls.

    (A) Left the program as soon as he could for what he viewed as a better job.
    (B) Came to the program after rebuffing USC, Auburn, etc., and effectively said it was time to restore order to the P12 universe.

    (A) Receives an almost cult-like status from Doogs. Doogs whom, if called out, cannot point to one specific aspect of coaching (A) does well. They'll spew unquantifiable bullshit like 'he's a program builder' or something similar.

    (B) Has been questioned from the very start by Doogs. Despite universal praise from outsiders and non-Doog UW fans, Doogs have been apathetic towards (B) at best and openly hostile at worst.

    Why? Is this passive-aggressive douchbaggery rooted not only in their innate knowledge that their fat Armenian cult leader not only failed to deliver on any of the goods they championed him for, but also that he betrayed them by leaving for a conference rival? If so, why keep up with the slavish defense of him? Because they know, deep down, that every excuse they spat at us was bullshit. Petersen's inevitable success will sting them and shatter every doog FS defense point. Coaching is everything. Same as it ever was. Everything else is a bunch of pollyanna excuse-making.

    Doogs are placing their butthurt egos over the wellbeing of the program. "The early missteps of Chris Petersen" get the fuck out of here. We can be genuinely excited for the first time since 2000 at the earliest. 1 doog is more FS than 1,000 redneck quooks and 1,000 underachieving coogs.
    It's personal with the Doogs. They know us Nega's support the Petersen hire. They also know like we've all stated that when Petersen wins it will blow up every Doog excuse out there.

    If they try to credit Sark I'll point out how Sark's wins over USC shouldn't count then since they were Ty's players.

    Like you said the guy was a loser coach and he wasn't loyal at all. First opportunity to leave the program he did just that. Another thing we all said about him was he lacked character which Doogs would argue with us about yet Sark showed his lack of character by the way he left.

    Noticed the players quotes about Petersen when he left vs the quotes about Sark when he left? You can't make that up.

    Doogs hate facts so I don't expect them to get it. They'll always be on Petersen's ass then in 2016 when he has us established a top 15 program they'll distanced themselves from Sark and claim they loved the hire the whole time. Lather, Rinse, Repeat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    They want Petersen to fail so they can be right.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter