Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bob Rondeau Doog

TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,837
in Hardcore Husky Board
Would take 9 wins right now ...

Another 5-4 fucking year in conference ...

Do these FS dumbfucks that think 9 wins this year means 5 conference wins?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,774 Founders Club
    This ^^
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,081 Standard Supporter
    I wonder what Damon would think. Paid employees are all predictable.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,957 Swaye's Wigwam
    Enough with the KJR talk, professor doogie.

    Can we get a fucking KJR talk bored?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Given that this team went 9-4 last year, had a top 15 advanced metrics finish, returns 17/22 starters and has a better coach and easier schedule, its fucktarded to say you'd take 9 wins. Even if it comes from a UW employee.

    In 2012 Rondeau did say he would take 6 wins. That team with Petersen goes 9-4 even with losing 4 OL. Rondeau sets the bar way too low.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,957 Swaye's Wigwam
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    had a top 15 advanced metrics finish

    Those "advanced metrics" are bullshit. The only thing UW was top 15 in was penalties
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Dave Softy Mahler‏@Softykjr·
    Rondeau says he would take 9 wins for UW right now. Agree?

    some real doog responses

    Andy Sommerville‏@AndySomm503·10h
    @Softykjr PAC 12 will be as tough as ever. 8 wins would still be a good season.

    andy harkleroad‏@HarkleHawk·10h
    @Softykjr NO 9 would be disappointing, unless one of those 9 is Oregon (nothing else matters)

    Dugan‏@DavePdxdawg·10h
    @Softykjr Yes. Good way to start off the Peterson Era...

    Nick Smith‏@UWNICKY·10h
    @Softykjr New QB, new coach. Anymore than 9 would be unreal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJCaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    "Andy Harkleroad?"

    Auce
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    hey, I know 2 Andy Sommervilles.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Why does Softy hate Peterman? Why does he hold Peterman to a higher standard than he did his buddy Sark? Softy was dancing' in the streets when Sark won 5 games with half the roster filled with future NFL'ers. Why the new standard?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    had a top 15 advanced metrics finish

    Those "advanced metrics" are bullshit. The only thing UW was top 15 in was penalties
    Any time you can be a hypothetical top 15 team in year five then that's special.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,774 Founders Club
    edited April 2014
    Rondeau is an excellent play-by-play guy. I can extend him some slack. I'd probably take 10 (regular season) wins, so it's not an outrageous comment.

    Plus he has some class and isn't a fat slob loudmouth mouthbreather Doog like Softy, or some amazon Affirmative Action Doog like Elise (I'd still tear it up -queer Kim wink ;) ).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    had a top 15 advanced metrics finish

    Those "advanced metrics" are bullshit. The only thing UW was top 15 in was penalties
    The metrics more than anything else have the most predictive value for the next season. My friend did a big study on it.

    Wins and championships are what matter most but the metrics are another way to show how good teams really are because they adjust for schedule difficulty and margin of victory.

    BTW, SRS (sports-reference) metrics has UW's 1991 team as the 2nd best college football team of all time, just slightly behind Nebraska 1995.

    I'll give you a pass but the metrics are not bullshit. Wise up before making another comment like that again.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dawgfan406Dawgfan406 Member Posts: 192
    Some would take 9 wins as long as one was @ oregon and a bowl win to get to 10.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fivehundredmileDAWGfivehundredmileDAWG Member Posts: 1,212
    We are done with that bullshit ...

    10 wins before the bowl or his ass gets hot ...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,957 Swaye's Wigwam
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    PostGameOrangeSlices said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    had a top 15 advanced metrics finish

    Those "advanced metrics" are bullshit. The only thing UW was top 15 in was penalties
    I'll give you a pass but the metrics are not bullshit. Wise up before making another comment like that again.

    Uhhh


    The metrics are fucking bullshit. They fail to account for Sark's complete coaching ineptitude in big games. UW would never finish in the top 15 under Sark; under no hypothetical metric bullshit scenario does Sark lead UW to the top 15
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,766 Swaye's Wigwam
    The metrics are there to show that based on talent and a number of other factors not related to the coach, how good a team is. The fact that we are top 15 in metrics but only top 25 in reality points exactly to how mediocre of a coach Sark is. It's an alternative to looking at a team getting a top recruiting class but then still being shit when that class steps on the field. Ultimately it points to what we have all been saying: UW is a program with all the tools to succeed on a national level in college football but hasn't because shitheads have been running it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 25,957 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited April 2014
    haie said:

    The metrics are there to show that based on talent and a number of other factors not related to the coach, how good a team is. The fact that we are top 15 in metrics but only top 25 in reality points exactly to how mediocre of a coach Sark is. It's an alternative to looking at a team getting a top recruiting class but then still being shit when that class steps on the field. Ultimately it points to what we have all been saying: UW is a program with all the tools to succeed on a national level in college football but hasn't because shitheads have been running it.

    The whole team was full of chokers and it started with the head coach. The metrics can't account for that. I also don't buy the top-15 talent argument. UW isn't in the top 2/3 of the fucking SEC as far as talent. UW is probably around #25 in talent, right where they are ranked.

    The metrics don't actually see the games and watch UW get boatraced in the ways that they do.

    also, the Pac-12 sucked.

    UW was what they were ranked, a borderline top-25 team with borderline top-25 talent...and top-15 in penalties
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,766 Swaye's Wigwam
    Yes if you take into account all the factors we have been bitching about UW is rightfully a top 25 team. But that's why metrics are a good tool, it gives you an idea of the team without those factors. Just because the SEC is the best conference in the country doesn't mean that our personnel had no business being top 15. It's just that we had no business being top 15 because of the culture of the team and Dude Bra.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DardanusDardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    The only way I'd be happy with 9-4 is if we went 9-0 in the conference.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.