FINALLY! Trump To Withhold Federal Funding From Sanctuary Cities
President Trump on Thursday said his administration will begin withholding funding from self-described sanctuary cities after a federal court ruled last week that it could do so.
“As per recent Federal Court ruling, the Federal Government will be withholding funds from Sanctuary Cities,” Trump tweeted. “They should change their status and go non-Sanctuary. Do not protect criminals!”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/finally-trump-to-withhold-federal-funding-from-sanctuary-cities/
Comments
-
About fucking time. Fuck those lawbreaking asshats.
-
Schumer shouldn't have threatened the SCOTUS yesterday.
Trump is striking while the Justice Roberts iron is hot.
-
Obamacare is under review again as wellPurpleThrobber said:Schumer shouldn't have threatened the SCOTUS yesterday.
Trump is striking while the Justice Roberts iron is hot. -
Seems like a good spot for the well....bye.gif.RaceBannon said:
Obamacare is under review again as wellPurpleThrobber said:Schumer shouldn't have threatened the SCOTUS yesterday.
Trump is striking while the Justice Roberts iron is hot.
Trump rolling hard while he's got the chance. It's been joyful since "impeachment' acquittal.
-
That idiot rat pol in chicago who tried to blame ICE for the rape of the 3 year old girl proves how insane these rats are. They don't deserve our tax dollars.
-
The Washington Post said the Coors shooter found a noose on his locker several years ago
Justifiable homicide -
As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. -
Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything elsednc said:As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. -
ICE has also started a "Flood the Streets" operation in these sanctuary cities. They are now arresting illegals outside of the court house. This is why Trump's supporters like him. He is doing what he said he would do.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/03/05/ice-agents-ignore-sanctuary-law-san-francisco-courthouse-arrest/ -
If only CD hadn't succumbed to the Typhus this could've killed him instead.
How beautiful that Poetic Justice would've been. One can only imagine. -
And they can do whatever they wantPitchfork51 said:
Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything elsednc said:As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when.
-
Local official here in SF are sputtering about how ICE's actions are illegal and in violation of state law. ICE is telling them to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
And they can do whatever they wantPitchfork51 said:
Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything elsednc said:As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. -
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone? -
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
-
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Rights never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
Hardly shocking that someone so ignorant of black voters isn't aware of this. -
I don't disagree.SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.
Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically. -
I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping.
-
Well racist Rat party members used to cry "States Rights" when they were trying to deny black Americans their civil rights, that is true but that's hardly the only state's rights issue.dnc said:
I don't disagree.SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.
Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically. -
You don't believe that a state should be able to set their own drinking age? How about gun laws? Should some states be able to allow concealed carry?RaceBannon said:I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping. -
Local control of education versus federal control
Legitimate debates on non racist issues have been quashed by associating them with the racists that cried state's rights
We are so far into federal control of everything that the left backtracking to deny the rights of citizens in favor of illegals is jarring -
Don't see the issue spelled out right there, do you?SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Rights never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
Hardly shocking that someone so ignorant of black voters isn't aware of this.
While I haven't dug into every Sanctuary City's policies, the few I've looked at is almost entirely virtue signaling by the Proggies in charge locally. The city cannot change federal law, nor absolve anyone from violations thereof. All they are really tangibly doing is cutting funding from enforcing federal immigration law: no city cops on immigration cases, not tracking immigration status with city resources, etc. It's good local politics, or at least that's what these city councils think, but bad policy. It results in instances like Border Patrol SWAT units being off the border and used to run immigration arrests within cities, because ICE doesn't have local police support. However, I haven't read a good explanation of how this, strictly speaking, is illegal.
A nuance lost here on the Proggy crowd that supports sanctuary cities, but decries the withdrawal of federal funds: The power that can give you a lot can take away a lot. -
Federalism is the better term for all this.RaceBannon said:Local control of education versus federal control
Legitimate debates on non racist issues have been quashed by associating them with the racists that cried state's rights
We are so far into federal control of everything that the left backtracking to deny the rights of citizens in favor of illegals is jarring -
Should some states be allowed to ignore the 2nd amendment and take your guns?SFGbob said:
You don't believe that a state should be able to set their own drinking age? How about gun laws? Should some states be able to allow concealed carry?RaceBannon said:I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping.
Like I said the name state's rights is so associated with racists that it should be retired with Jim Crow
There are things legitimately left to the states. -
Here is what bothers me and many people I talk toGrundleStiltzkin said:
Don't see the issue spelled out right there, do you?SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Rights never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
Hardly shocking that someone so ignorant of black voters isn't aware of this.
While I haven't dug into every Sanctuary City's policies, the few I've looked at is almost entirely virtue signaling by the Proggies in charge locally. The city cannot change federal law, nor absolve anyone from violations thereof. All they are really tangibly doing is cutting funding from enforcing federal immigration law: no city cops on immigration cases, not tracking immigration status with city resources, etc. It's good local politics, or at least that's what these city councils think, but bad policy. It results in instances like Border Patrol SWAT units being off the border and used to run immigration arrests within cities, because ICE doesn't have local police support. However, I haven't read a good explanation of how this, strictly speaking, is illegal.
A nuance lost here on the Proggy crowd that supports sanctuary cities, but decries the withdrawal of federal funds: The power that can give you a lot can take away a lot.
Local districts in the name of progress and sanctuary will charge illegals differently than citizens. Biden said drunk driving isn't serious enough to warrant deportation but to make sure some don't even get charge. We see folks released to commit crimes again
It's a real political issue. I know at home how much it pisses people off which is why I always talk about it. Free healthcare is another hot button. Its enough to cost the democrats power
Bernie 2016 understood his working class appeal and free shit could not work with open borders. Now he apparently doesn't give a shit
-
He's done or is doing pretty much everything he promised to do. Amazing given the commie resistance within our government!SFGbob said:ICE has also started a "Flood the Streets" operation in these sanctuary cities. They are now arresting illegals outside of the court house. This is why Trump's supporters like him. He is doing what he said he would do.
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2020/03/05/ice-agents-ignore-sanctuary-law-san-francisco-courthouse-arrest/ -
Dealing with illegals arrested was as simple as making a phone call. Hardly a high cost item.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Don't see the issue spelled out right there, do you?SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Rights never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
Hardly shocking that someone so ignorant of black voters isn't aware of this.
While I haven't dug into every Sanctuary City's policies, the few I've looked at is almost entirely virtue signaling by the Proggies in charge locally. The city cannot change federal law, nor absolve anyone from violations thereof. All they are really tangibly doing is cutting funding from enforcing federal immigration law: no city cops on immigration cases, not tracking immigration status with city resources, etc. It's good local politics, or at least that's what these city councils think, but bad policy. It results in instances like Border Patrol SWAT units being off the border and used to run immigration arrests within cities, because ICE doesn't have local police support. However, I haven't read a good explanation of how this, strictly speaking, is illegal.
A nuance lost here on the Proggy crowd that supports sanctuary cities, but decries the withdrawal of federal funds: The power that can give you a lot can take away a lot.
We had a BP agent that lived in my city and he had a take home government ride. We'd give him a call and he'd picj 'em up on his way to work! Otherwise it just took a little longer for them to pick up. Cost my ass. -
RaceBannon said:
Should some states be allowed to ignore the 2nd amendment and take your guns?SFGbob said:
You don't believe that a state should be able to set their own drinking age? How about gun laws? Should some states be able to allow concealed carry?RaceBannon said:I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping.
Like I said the name state's rights is so associated with racists that it should be retired with Jim Crow
There are things legitimately left to the states.
K.I.S.S. Pretty well laid out right thur for y'all.
Anything in question, let the 9 homeys in robes figure it out.
-
Immigration is regulated at the federal level, chiefly under the rules established in 1952 with the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 was enacted to curb illegal immigration, denying welfare benefits to undocumented immigrants and strengthening sanctions against employers who hire them.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
The U.S. Congress has control over all immigration-related regulations, while the White House is in charge of enforcing immigration laws.
Jurisdiction and the Supremacy Clause
The federal government's jurisdiction over immigration law has consistently been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, which has overruled attempts by state legislatures to single out immigrants. Additionally, the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution is generally interpreted to mean that federal laws trump state laws, except for certain matters constitutionally left to the states.
Sorry, you were saying? -
@dnc, you're confusing the Constitution's language with the Declaration of Independence. Two vastly different documents. Two vastly different purposes.dnc said:
I don't disagree.SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.
Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically.
C'mon @dnc. You're better than that. -
Sanctuary cities aren't about fucking states rights or the Constitution. They are about showing how compassionate they are by sticking it to Trump.
