FINALLY! Trump To Withhold Federal Funding From Sanctuary Cities
Comments
-
And they can do whatever they wantPitchfork51 said:
Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything elsednc said:As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when.
-
Local official here in SF are sputtering about how ICE's actions are illegal and in violation of state law. ICE is telling them to go fuck themselves.RaceBannon said:
And they can do whatever they wantPitchfork51 said:
Cant be. I'm told that California subsidizes everything elsednc said:As you know I'm not a huge Trump fan but this seems completely justifiable.
As my Dad always says "What the federal government subsidizes, the federal government controls".
Will be chinteresting to see who caves, and when. -
Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone? -
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
-
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Rights never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
Hardly shocking that someone so ignorant of black voters isn't aware of this. -
I don't disagree.SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.
Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically. -
I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping.
-
Well racist Rat party members used to cry "States Rights" when they were trying to deny black Americans their civil rights, that is true but that's hardly the only state's rights issue.dnc said:
I don't disagree.SFGbob said:
When Rat party members stood in the school house doorway I didn't support it. Now when they thumb their nose at Federal law, I don't support it. State's have no authority over immigration issues. That's a section of the law left solely to the Federal government. Are some people above the law? State's Right never involved areas of the law that are solely the purview of Federal Government.dnc said:
Not hilarious that conservatives are suddenly against states rights after spending the last 160 years supporting them?TurdBomber said:Hilarious that the dumb fucking Dems are making states rights arguments, after spending the last 40 years shitting all over any Red State that tried to assert them.
Hypocrisy anyone?
We're living in the upside down.
I also think when the states won't support the rights of "life, liberty and pursuit of happiness" for certain individuals in their purvey then it's the federal governments right (and responsibility) to step in and enforce those rights.
Which pretty much ends the vast majority of states rights issues historically. -
You don't believe that a state should be able to set their own drinking age? How about gun laws? Should some states be able to allow concealed carry?RaceBannon said:I was never for State's Rights
That wasn't a conservative issue not that I am a conservative. It was a racist's issue.
Not everything is everybody does it equally
The people I supported back in the day who now support state's rights and illegals over citizens are hurting minorities and white workers the most. The very people the democrats claim to help.
And the people that Trump is helping. -
Local control of education versus federal control
Legitimate debates on non racist issues have been quashed by associating them with the racists that cried state's rights
We are so far into federal control of everything that the left backtracking to deny the rights of citizens in favor of illegals is jarring
